Kennedy Center Terrace Theater - ARCHIVE
Click here to go to this
theater's main page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven Guitars
March 14-16, April 3
Reviewed March 14 by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:45 - one
intermission
An emotionally challenging play read well
Price - $65
Click here to buy the script |
August Wilson's 1940's installment in his cycle of ten plays set decade by
decade throughout the twentieth century is another emotionally involving
story of characters who are solidly drawn and whose language captures their
hopes, their fears and their world in words that ring true whether read from
the page or heard from the stage. Most of the cast has appeared in Wilson
plays before - some playing the roles they play here. Their familiarity with
the material also signals their appreciation for it. There is a clear
devotion to the language of August Wilson - indeed, the cast ends the
curtain call by raising their scripts in one unified gesture that says "your
applause is for this!" It is a fine moment. The evening that precedes it
features superb performances by Harry Lennix as the would-be recording star
who has to spring his guitar from pawn if he's to realize the dreams of his
life, and Afemo Omilami as the character whose name continues through
Wilson's cycle to resonate in the title of the play dealing with the 1980s,
King Hedley II. Strong performances come from each of the other five
cast members. They all carry the script in their hands which is a
distraction. Kenny Leon, the artistic director of the entire cycle, designed
a leather binding for the scripts (see the photo on the right) which is a
touch of class. But it is still a distraction.
Storyline: In the Hill District of Pittsburgh in 1948, would-be recording
star Floyd Barton finally has hope. After squandering the fee for his only
recording session, leaving Vera, the woman who had stood by him, spending
ninety days in the workhouse and pawning his guitar, the first glimmer of a
turnaround comes in the form of a letter from the recording company asking
him to come record more songs for them. His neighbors care about his life
but also have concerns of their own. Hedley, whose father named him King,
Ruby who isn't quite sure who is the father of the baby she's carrying, and
the others move on with their lives while Floyd tries to convince his former
love to come to Chicago with him for the recording session.
There are two ways to approach this production. One is to
view it as one of the ten staged readings of the entire
history-making ten play cycle covering the century. To achieve this, a
theatergoer would have to attend ten performances - preferably in the
chronological order of the play's subjects. This would mean ten separate
visits to the Terrace Theatre totaling nearly 30 hours at a cost of $650.
Such a commitment of time and money is significant but this is an unprecedented
opportunity which can be expected to yield impressive insights into Wilson's
unprecedented accomplishment. Another is to approach it as a free-standing
offering, a dramatic presentation on its own. Either way, it offers solid
performances, fine costuming, acceptable setting, lighting and incidental
music.
The opportunity to experience the
entire cycle is unique and, so, making allowances for the fact that these
are readings may well be justified. As a stand-alone production, however, this
performance suffers from the fact that the cast
is reading from the scripts they hold in their hands. Normally, the concept
of a staged reading serves a developing work well, allowing a playwright a
chance to judge how a piece will impact a live audience. For a finished work
- especially one as finely crafted and highly thought of as are each of Wilson's
ten plays - a reading does a disservice to the work, and at full prices,
shortchanges the paying public. Certainly, the cast members all really do
know their lines - they've rehearsed and studied and prepared as
professionals do. The amount of rehearsal time may have been less than for a
"fully staged production" but these professionals do know their jobs. Still,
the presence of the script in their hands is a distraction and some (but not
all) break their concentration to find their place from time to time. The play begins with bantering dialogue between
characters which is awkward when the performers are speaking to their
scripts rather than to each other. Worse,
because their hands are occupied with the bound script, hand held props are
not used. It is really distracting to have the actors mime the process of
handing items like a pack of cigarettes from one to the other. Obviously the
actors and the director know that consulting the scripts can harm a moment
or a scene. As the emotional intensity of the action escalates in the second
act, some in the cast cease holding the scripts up and stop looking at them
entirely.
The best aspect of the physical design is the work of
costume designer Reggie Ray. While the demands of using a repertory cast for
the entire cycle and the decision to minimize costume changes within any given
play limited him somewhat, the costumes are as well done as you would expect
of a full production at the best of theaters. What's more, costume changes
that are important to a given play are included. Vanessa Bell Calloway changes
from a print housedress to a slinky red number when, as Vera, she decides to
go with Harry Lennix's Floyd to Chicago. David Gallo designed a basic set
for the entire cycle with a massive "portal" inside the Terrace Theater's
proscenium, and a backdrop of his sketch of the Hill District of Pittsburgh
where nine of the ten plays take place. For each of the individual plays,
set pieces consisting of windows, doors, porches or walls are slid into
place creating the basic spatial relationship required for the action. It is
something less than you would see for a full production of one of the plays,
but it is sufficient to help create the feel of Wilson's world. It is aided
by active lighting which alters the appearance of the backdrop for scenes
that take place in morning, afternoon or evening or as interiors or
exteriors. Nighttime never gets quite as dark as might otherwise be the case,
however,
because the actors need enough light to be able to see their
scripts.
Written by August Wilson. Directed by Derrick Sanders.
Design: David Gallo (set) Reggie Ray (costumes) Allen Lee Hughes (lights)
Dwight Andrews (music) Brandon Prendergast (stage manager). Cast: Vanessa
Bell Calloway, Crystal Fox, Russell Hornsby, LaTanya Richardson Jackson,
Harry Lennix, Afemo Omilami, Ellis E. Williams.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
King Hedley II
March 23, 27, April 6
Reviewed March 23 by
David Siegel |
Running time - 3
hours - one intermission
A prophetic cry to Heaven for relief by the impoverished
Price - $65
Click here to buy the script |
August Wilson’s King Hedley II is the 1980’s installment of his cycle
of 10 decades through 10 plays dealing with 20th Century African
American life in the United States. As with the previously reviewed
Seven Guitars, the cast is performing a fully staged reading; that means
they carry their scripts with them throughout the production. What is so
very fortunate for DC area audiences at this staged reading is that the
director and cast is so very familiar with Wilson from their previous work,
including specifically with King Hedley II. Director Derrick Sanders
also directed the critically well-received revival of Hedley at New
York’s Signature Theater in 2007. It is with pleasure that this reviewer
reports that rarely are the scripts checked or read from and rarer still are
there dropped lines or miscues. As with Seven Guitars, at the curtain
call, the cast holds high the specially covered scripts to the appreciative
audience. Given the prophetic language and Biblical references throughout
King Hedley II, this gesture feels like a spiritual movement; it has a
church-like feel such as parishioners holding their Bibles up high to praise
God or as in a synagogue when the assembled kiss their prayer books as an
act of devotion to God. Hedley is a drama that should be seen in
order
to understand the fullest picture of what Wilson was trying to say to the rest of
us. The original 2001 Broadway production had only a short run of 72
performances after its pre-Broadway tryout right here at the Kennedy Center.
The play was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize.
Storyline: An ex-con in the Reagan years tries to rebuild his life by
selling stolen refrigerators and robbing the neighborhood jeweler so he can
buy a video store. But grand dreams for his wife and unborn child are
threatened by a system that does not play by his rules. He pays the ultimate
price from an unexpected source.
Wilson's King Hedley II is one of his lesser known and revived plays.
Wilson has created a loud prophetic cry to Heaven by those here on Earth who
feel dispossessed, unloved, unnoticed and undervalued. The production begins
with a voice-over introduction to the United States as the greatest country
in the world, but one whose promise is yet unmet. Then there is the cry of
an urban prophet who teaches that people need to know the story of where
they came from if they are to make progress for themselves and their
children to a better place here on Earth, and if they continue to sin or
forget to teach their children, God will bring the fire next time.
Throughout Hedley there is the constant juxtaposition of those with
faith and those more secular in their approach to the conditions they
face. In this staged reading directed by Derrick Sanders, the feel is of a
full production. Sure there are few changes of costumes, and fewer nifty
theatrical devices, both technical and cast generated, but after this
production gets rolling, there is no sense of being slighted. Sanders knows
his business since he has directed Hedley before. He lets the script
carry itself on its own very strong legs. It is an excellent choice,
especially for those who have not seen the piece before. The audience gets
to “read” the script rather than dramatic flourishes. Thank You, Mr.
Sanders.
The complex, weighty work of Russell
Hornsby’s King Hedley II is both heat and emotion quickly brought out, but
also a tenderness that is truly unexpected. His love for growing plants in
“bad dirt” carries a sense of what Hedley might really want … calm and peace
in his life, his marriage and hopes for his unborn child. Lynda Gravatt’s
earthy 60+ year old Ruby, mother to Hedley, is a calming influence on the
action of this piece until the very last scene, when the unexpected and
somewhat operatic and melodramatic happens. Gravatt is definitely one
sensual being whenever the script calls for it. She can swing her shoulders
and give a sassy line delivery that bring hoots and hollers from the
audience. James A. Williams, as Stool Pigeon the Prophet, presents his
prophetic words with ardor and then just disappears from view and returns
with more faith for the community to hear. Heather Alicia Simms is Hedley’s
wife, Tonya. She has one particular poignant monologue that brought
immediate silence to the proceedings on the stage and in the audience as she
speaks of why she would rather not bring another child into the world … a
world that is mean spirited, hateful, impoverishing and could all too easily
take the child’s father away either to prison or worse … to death. Stephen
McKinley Henderson’s 60+ year old Elmore, the paramour to Ruby, is one slick
fast-talking gambler with life. The audience can see it in his eyes and his
jaunty movements, that is until he must kill or be killed. Then he is all
business even if the man he may kill is half his age. It is Henderson who
verbalizes the unspeakable words that set the final actions of the play into
motion. Finally, Mister, as played in this performance by Jason Dirden, is
one cocky hanger-on to Hedley, who heats up the final scene by egging Hedley
on, when he could have cooled the situation.
The Terrace Theatre production has a minimum
of costume changes, a single set, and some nicely rendered lighting. And yet, one does not come away feeling slighted. The work of
Reggie Ray, the costume designer, is well done. There is an especially
unexpected touch in one costume change for Lynda Gravatt who comes out in
Act II in a flaming red dress and sings and dances. She is a stunning sight.
Written by August Wilson.
Directed by Derrick Sanders. Design: David Gallo (set) Reggie Ray (costumes)
Allen Lee Hughes (lights) Dwight Andrews (music) Jill BC Duboff
(sound) Joan Marcus (photography) Shari Silberglitt and Stephen Neverson
(stage manager). Cast: Jason Dirden or John Earl Jelks, Lynda Gravatt,
Stephen McKinley Henderson, Russell Hornsby, Heather Alicia Simms,
James A. Williams. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 16 - 24, 2007
Mrs. Packard
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:25 - one
intermission
A solidly produced view of a slice of little known history
Click here to buy the book |
What kind of theater is “your thing?” Musicals? Comedies? Classics?
Historical Dramas? If the later, you need to know about this short run of a
new play being co-produced by The McCarter Theatre Center of Princeton, New
Jersey and the Kennedy Center's Fund for New American Plays. The drama, by
McCarter Artistic Director Emily Mann, is one of those fascinating plays that
recreate an historical event that you probably didn't know a thing about but
which, once you've witnessed the play, becomes part of your knowledge base
and your perception of our common past. In this instance, it is women's
rights, American history, the development of mental health treatment and the
influence of organized religions on society that are at issue. Your views on
each is likely to be affected by spending an evening in the Terrace Theater
on top of the Kennedy Center this month.
Storyline: This docu-drama follows Elizabeth Packard
from the day in 1861 that her husband had her committed to an insane asylum
because her religious beliefs ran counter to his. This was a failing he
could not accept because he was a conservative Calvinist minister who had
already lost a number of posts, he assumes because of the disrepute her
attitudes brought on him. It ends three years later when she finally
wins her freedom after suffering the horrors of incarceration in squalid
circumstances and the indignity of confrontations with officials who held
that her rights had not been violated because, as a woman, she had none.
Emily Mann is probably best known among Potomac Region
theatergoers for her script for Having Our Say, the charming adaptation of
the book by the centenarian Delany sisters. Her interest in using the stage
to explore historical themes can be seen in her other works: Execution of
Justice which was drawn from trial transcripts of the assassin of San
Francisco Mayor George Moscone and Councilman Harvey Milk, Still Life
about the experience of an American serviceman who served in Vietnam and
Greensboro (A Requiem) dealing with the murder of anti-Ku Klux Klan
demonstrators in North Carolina. She seems to have a preference for subjects
where she can take a strong position on one side of an issue. This may make
for engaging theater. However, there is a feeling in Mrs. Packard that the
views of the heroine's persecutors - her husband and her doctor - have been
dismissed by the author as not worthy of dramatization. This is a pity, for
it would be fascinating to understand just how their views matched their
time in history. After all, they were probably the majority view of the
time. Instead, Mann presents them in the hindsight of current views. The
approach also robs Mrs. Packard of any credit for being forward thinking. We
see the injustice but we don't see the tug of war that creates change in a
society that at least aspires to openness and progress in the human
condition.
As theater rather than as history, however, there are
strengths here to be valued. Most notably, there is the performance of
Kathryn Meisle as the ill-fated, strong-willed Mrs. Packard. The
intelligence that shines from her eyes, the dignity that is signaled by her
posture and the energy of her struggle dominates the evening. There are also
good performances by John C. Vennema who has to deal
with the
one-dimensional role of Mrs. Packard's husband, and Dennis Parlato, who is at
least given some soft edges to humanize the doctor who oversees Mrs.
Packard's incarceration. The production is a hefty one with a set that you
will probably guess is the work of Eugene Lee when you first see it. It has
the mechanical, ironwork fencing and bridgework look of his most famous
designs including Ragtime and Wicked, not to mention the main
set for Saturday Night Live.
You may come away wanting to know even more,
so we have included a link on this page for ordering a reprint of one of
Mrs. Packard's own volumes, her "Modern Persecution or Insane Asylums
Unveiled - Volume II" which picks up where the play ends. It is a heavy,
hefty tome. It runs some 422 pages covering 54 chapters with headings like
"My Release on a Writ of Habeas Corpus," "Return to my Home - Married Woman
as Slave," "Dangerous to be a Married Woman in Illinois!" and "The
Imputation of Insanity a Barrier to Human Progress," but it fills in many of
the questions that may be raised in the inevitable post-show discussions
among those who adjourn from theater to restaurant, cafe, pub, bar or living
room to thrash out just what has come before.
Written and directed by Emily Mann. Fight direction by
Rick Sordelet. Movement direction by Peter Cucci. Design: Eugene Lee (set) Jennifer von Mayrhauser (costumes)
Jeff Croiter (lights) Rob Milburn and Michael Bodeen (incidental music and
sound) T. Charles Erickson (photography) Cheryl Mintz (stage manager). Cast:
Julie Boyd, Jeff Brooks, Robin Chadwick, Georgine Hall, Kathryn Meisle,
Dennis Parlato, Molly Regan, Fiana Toibin, John C. Vennema.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
July 5 - 23, 2006
The Complete
History of America (abridged) |
Running time 2:05 - one intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for six hundred years of
laughs compressed into two hours
Click here to buy the script
Click here to buy the DVD |
The Reduced Shakespeare Company has made an
industry of generating comic delights from heavy material. Their best
known is their first, The Complete Works of William Shakespeare
(Abridged). That is the reason for the company's name, which might lead
some to think they are British. Nope. They started in California as a San
Francisco street theater-type troupe. In 1993, six years after the
Shakespeare piece, they added this comic survey of American history. Since
then, they have added works on the Bible, western civilization as a musical,
the great books and even that most hallowed of topics, the complete
Hollywood. The History of America has been made available for license for professional and community theaters to perform (click
here to read
our review of the show as performed by Wayside Theater last year), but it is
at its funniest when performed by the company that created it. Here, two of
the three originators perform along with one completely successful
replacement.
Storyline: A cast of three assume all the
roles in a survey of the topic from before Amerigo Vespucci to the
Presidents Bush. They try to milk the iconographic stories of the United
States for humor and to use the humor to comment on the gap between
America's promise and her success.
The laughs begin even before the audience
realizes they are seeing the show. The pre-show "turn off your cell phones"
announcement includes such gems as "management wishes to remind you that
this theater is equipped to provide assistance to the hearing impaired. If
you or a member of your party is hearing ... paired ... eeze ... tact ...
nush ... for more ... nkyou." This sort of foolishness continues non-stop
for the next two hours. Overheard from a member of the audience in the
elevator after the show: "Some of it is marginal, but, if you're already
laughing, you can't stop." That is really the key, for the laughter is not
only contagious, it has a momentum all its own. It captures you from the
first moment and hardly lets you take a breath. Amazingly, the fifteen
minute intermission doesn't seem to interrupt the pace. By that time, the
audience not only appreciates the opportunity to draw a few unencumbered
breaths, they are anxious to continue the enjoyment.
Reed Martin, with his shaved head and imposing
presence seems to lead the troupe, while curly headed Austin Tichenor takes
the audience into his confidence attempting to explain some of what is
transpiring. They are joined by Dominic Conti, a tall and lanky comedian who
fits right into the feeling of the piece. Together they throw a seemingly
inexhaustible supply of one-liners at the audience in a survey sufficiently
structured to give the evening a flow. That flow seems to jump just a bit
when intermission separates the Civil War and World War I as if nothing
transpired in the intervening half century. But it is a trap. The trio admit
the gap, saying that nothing much happened in that period that was very
funny, which they demonstrate . . . backwards.
The show is the construction of the team itself. There
is no credit for a director or for any designers. Not even lighting is
credited, although lighting effects are used throughout. The set, such as it
is, consists of an early American flag (thirteen stars) and a panel
depiction of the span from Amerigo Vespucci's time to our own. The three
cast members with just a few props and costume changes (mostly just hats)
create all the effects the humor needs.
Written by Adam Long, Reed Martin and Austin Tichenor.
Cast: Dominic Conti, Reed Martin, Austin Tichenor.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 17 - 25, 2006
Love-Lies-Bleeding |
Running time 1:30 - no
intermission
An examination of issues surrounding euthanasia
Click here to buy the script |
New play programs make important contributions
to the art of theater and obviously involve taking some risks. Sometimes
that process results in discoveries for audiences that can be fascinating,
scintillating and memorable. Sometimes, as here, they don't. This new play,
produced with the assistance of the Center's Fund for New American Plays,
and supported by the National Endowment for the Arts, is by a novelist and
playwright of note who has a PEN/Faulkner Award for Fiction to his credit.
This all would justify high hopes. What is more, it deals with a cutting
edge topic about the value of life, but it does so in an astonishingly
lifeless way. It is presented by one of the premiere regional theater
companies in the country with such earnestness that it is difficult to
determine if its humorlessness is a result of the writing or of the
directing. The thoughtful and effective contributions of the design team
give the performers and the script every advantage, but can't, and shouldn't
be expected to compensate for the lack of life in the material and its
delivery.
Storyline: The current wife, a former wife and the son of a stroke
victim debate ending his life now that he is in a "permanent vegetative
state." Has his life already ended? What claim to their devotion or care
does he retain? What duty do they owe to him? Who has the right to make a
continue-or-terminate decision and just what does either option mean? The
debate continues as they administer potentially lethal doses of morphine and
wait for the expected results.
New York writer Don DeLillo has selected a
topic that is full of theatrical potential, but has constricted the view so
tightly that very little of that potential is explored. The "permanent
vegetative state" of the stroke victim is a rather antiseptic non-state
involving practically no inconveniences or requirements for care, and the
people surrounding him have little obvious emotional connection to his life.
His current wife has the most affectionate reminiscences to voice, but she
seems fairly content to take a walk while his son and former wife do the
deed. Neither of them seem to have either ethical or emotional claims on the
remnant of his life. Left unexplored are issues such as the financial impact
of continued care, legal matters including rights and responsibilities and
the role of any of his pre-stroke decisions or views.
The victim is played by two actors - John
Heard and Larry Kucharik. Heard plays the victim in flash backs. Flanking
the main portion of the one-act play are prologue and epilogue scenes
showing him confined to a wheel chair after a first stroke. Flashbacks
during the center section of the play show him before that first stroke.
Kucharik has the physically demanding task of being the victim "in
extremis." He sits in his wheel chair, slumped over completely "vegetative"
with no reactions and, of course, no lines to deliver.
Among the still-living are Penelope Walker
who is a fairly warm presence as the
current wife who seems incapable of coping with the matters at hand, and
Louis Cancelmi and Martha Lavey who are colder and sharper as the more
take-charge characters from the man's past. Most of the discussion of
values that does take place is in their hands. They deliver their lines with
an earnestness that is nearly devoid of human humor and sheds little light
on just why they should care about the fate of the victim. Without that, how
is the audience to care?
Written by Don DeLillo. Directed by Amy
Morton. Produced by the Steppenwolf Theatre Company. Design: Loy Arcenas
(set) Nan Cibula-Jenkins (costumes) J.R. Lederle (lights) Josh Schmidt
(sound) Michael Brosilow (photography) Malcolm Ewen (stage manager). Cast:
Louis Cancelmi, John Heard, Larry Kucharik, Martha Lavey, Penelope Walker.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 11 – 13,
2004
Letters from
Tennessee:
A Distant Country
Called Youth |
Reviewed June 11
Running time 1:25 with no intermission |
Those who attended the Shakespeare Theatre's
production of Five by Tenn in this
same theater last April will enjoy this opportunity to enter into Mr.
Williams' presence again. Then it was Jeremy Lawrence performing as
Williams, using the author's own words from interviews and stage directions.
Those encounters were interspersed among short plays by Williams. Here it is
Richard Thomas performing selections from Williams' correspondence. There
are no additional plays being offered, simply a chance to spend about an
hour and a half with the author in a self revealing mood. The cumulative
effect is to leave you feeling you know the man who produced the plays that
the current Tennessee Williams Explored festival is presenting downstairs in
the Eisenhower Theater.
Storyline: This bio-play was assembled from
the letters that Tennessee Williams wrote to his family, friends and
publishers and producers he hoped would buy his works. The one-man
show covers Williams' private and professional life from childhood through
his early successes on Broadway.
Thomas is an engaging presence on stage and
he succeeds in creating a convincing portrait of the playwright. He matures
nicely over the course of the short evening from a young teenager to a young
adult and he draws the audience along on the journey. At a few points he
includes audience reactions in his delivery, stretching out a pause when a
laugh on a line might obscure the following point. One segment has him
sipping from a martini glass and his tongue seems both liberated and
lubricated by the impact of the spirits. Thomas wisely avoids overdoing the
effect.
Director Steve Lawson has Thomas moving back
and forth between three music stands on which are the letters from which he
reads. He keeps the pace of the performance almost excessively brisk. The
three stands are in front of a projection screen on which are shown a
collection of snapshots of Williams, his family and friends as well as a few
production shots from his early plays. The selection of photographs seems
rather random although they are apparently chronological, as are the
letters. A photo of his mother comes on when he starts a letter to her but
stays on during letters to others. At other times the screen is blank
through numerous letters. There never seems to be a strong connection
between the visuals and the text.
The program doesn't include a credit for
either set design or sound design. The production could have used a set
designer to give the stage a bit of depth and dramatic interest by varying
the three podium areas and by masking some of the large screen which had
plenty of blank space when a photo was projected and which gave the stage a
naked feel when one was not. At a minimum, the area of the projections could
have been cropped so that the projector which was suspended from the
theater's ceiling would not block the view for patrons seated further back
than row R. Credit should go, however, to the Terrace Theater's sound
department for the marvelously natural reinforcement of Thomas' voice which
carried nicely back to those in the rear rows.
Adapted and directed by Steve Lawson. Design:
Martha Mountain (lights) Sandra Barrack (stage manager) Cast: Richard
Thomas.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
August 27 - September 14, 2003
Nijinsky's Last Dance |
Reviewed August 27
Running time 1 hour 30 minutes
For mature audiences - Nudity
Price range $25 - $30
t
Potomac Stages Pick
|
Returning to what had been a practically indelible theatrical memory can be
hazardous - what if it isn’t as good as you remember? Not to worry! The
magical collaboration of author, actor, director, choreographer, set, sound,
costume and lighting designers which made the one-act experience of the life
of a legendary dancer, the late Vaslav Nijinsky, one of the strongest single
evenings in years of theatergoing has been recreated and the magic is still
there. What is even more incredible, it doesn’t feel like a recreation at
all. It feels as fresh and new as it did in 1998 in the smaller, more
intimate space at Signature Theater where it earned Helen Hayes Awards for
Outstanding Play, Outstanding Director, Outstanding Lighting Design and
Outstanding Sound Design as well as drawing nominations for Outstanding
Choreography and Outstanding Performance by an Actor. All of those nominees
and winners, along with the egregiously overlooked other members of the
original team who really did contribute outstanding costume design and a
truly outstanding set design, are back to assure that the re-mounting of the
production in the larger Terrace Theater of the Kennedy Center meets the
standard of the original.
Storyline: This
one-performer biographical play finds Vaslav Nijinsky, his mental
instability having advanced to the point that he is confined to an asylum,
recalling his life and career. That life started in 1888 in Kiev, Ukraine.
At ten he was in the Imperial Ballet School in St. Petersburg. By twenty he
was a star of Sergei Diaghilev’s famed Ballets Russes, virtually creating
the concept of a celebrity male ballet dancer and crossing over into
choreography, capturing world attention for himself and the company while
premiering such now classic ballets as Debussy’s Afternoon of a Faun
and Stravinsky’s Petrouchka and The Right of Spring. While
pursuing the adulation of audiences in public, in private Nijinsky sought
the adoration of a string of sexual partners without regard to gender. He
was Diaghilev’s lover as well as that of his first patron Prince Lvov, he
married and had two children and through it all he had a habit of engaging
prostitutes. At thirty he was in a mental institution.
The more you know about
Nijinsky’s life and his professional accomplishments, the more you get from
the performance, but you needn’t know much more than the paragraph above to
be fascinated by both the subject matter and the pure theatricality of the
experience. Author Norman Allen provides all the information you need in the
text without stopping the flow for an introductory speech. He has all the
facts and people of the story flow directly from the mind of Nijinsky in a
stream-of-consciousness experience that, while carefully structured to make
sure important information is provided when needed, seems to spring directly
from Nijinsky’s troubled mind.
Allen
provides the words and the structure and actor Jeremy Davidson brings the
character to intense life. The physicality of his performance is astonishing
as he switches between Nijinsky and Nijinsky’s impressions of the people in
his life including most memorably impresario Diaghilev. Under director Joe
Calarco and choreographer Karma Camp, Davidson’s every movement flows from
the immediately preceding movement and sets up the next. It is a part that
must be danced but the magic is found in the fact that Davidson, playing an
over-the-hill Nijinsky recalling his glory days, doesn’t show us Nijinsky
dancing so much as he shows us Nijinsky being a dancer. It is a fine
distinction but it is the secret to the effectiveness of the piece. It keeps
this from being an impersonation and allows Davidson to create a
fascinating, touching and troubled human being. As his Nijinsky conjures up
the memories of those who touched his life, Davidson has the movements and
postures to bring it all to life. Note the way in which he uses Diaghilev’s
cane, astonishing when you realize that Davidson doesn’t actually have a
cane - he’s just holding his hand and moving his body as if he did.
The
design team has created a world in which Davidson’s Nijinsky shines like a
jewel on display, every facet struck by a light, underlined by a sound,
highlighted by pure space. Lou Stancari’s minimalist platform and light
stanchion set is nearly nothing till brought to life by the other elements -
and then it is perfect. Daniel McLean Wagner’s lighting design must have as
many different settings as there are minutes in the play but every one of
them is in service to the story being told and the world being created.
David Maddox brings more than just some ballet music in at the right moment,
he creates a sonic environment with everything from the ovations that waft
over Nijinsky in his triumphs to the whispers of gossip, the cries and boos
of an outraged public and the sound of cell doors slamming. The performance
begins with sound, the rhythmic whisper of Nijinsky’s feet trudging to his
cell. Anne Kennedy’s costume which comes off and then goes back on in
layers, is perfect for the setting and the needs of the story. When it comes
all the way off, the frontal nudity isn’t a shock or a ploy.
Written by Norman Allen.
Directed by Joe Calarco. Choreographed by Karma Camp. Design: Lou Stancari
(set) Anne Kennedy (costumes) David Maddox (sound) Daniel MacLean Wagner
(lights) Carol Pratt (photography) Ronny Gunderson (stage manager). Cast:
Jeremy Davidson. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
July 2 – 14, 2002
Greater Tuna |
Reviewed July 2
Running time 1 hour 50 minutes
t
Potomac Stages Pick |
Very few live performances ever seem exactly the same two nights in a row.
So how can these two gentle souls seem exactly the same two decades in a
row? Joe Sears and Jaston Williams brought their affectionate portrait of
life in the third smallest town in the Lone Star State to the Kennedy Center
twenty years ago and they have brought the cast of twenty-some-odd
characters (and odd is the operative word) back to renew our acquaintance
many times in the original Greater Tuna, in the holiday themed A
Tuna Christmas and the Fourth of July edition Red, White and
Tuna. Well, Greater Tuna is back and it is as genuinely
entertaining and downright funny as ever.Storyline: A day in the life
of small town Tuna, Texas. Nothing world shattering happens because nothing
world shattering ever happens here. There’s the farm report on WKKK radio to
set the scene, Bertha Bumiller is fixing breakfast for her children while
trying to keep the eight dogs out of the house, Petey Fisk is delivering
public service announcements for the humane society and the smut snatchers
are working to get dirty words excised from the High School’s dictionaries.
The gimmick here is that Sears and Williams play all two dozen parts in
as many different costumes but at an unhurried, relaxed and casual pace that
belies the feverish activities that must take place hidden from view by the
central set piece behind which they wander without a hint of hurry. In front
of the set piece is a single floor model radio from which emerges some of
the commentary the two began in the opening sequence of the morning radio
report. But there is enough variety in the recorded bits, the entrances and
exits off stage right and left as well as from behind the set that the only
time it appears predictable is when a gag requires it.
Audience anticipation is a major factor in the humor. Even those who are
making their first visit to Tuna, Texas, quickly size up the routine and can
feel some of the punch lines a mile away. There is a satisfying feeling when
the lines actually land, in part because they are just off kilter enough to
be fresh. There is a feeling of topical humor although most of the barbs are
the same as they were twenty years ago.
Sears and Wiliams along with their director Ed Howard have maintained
this innocent slice of small town Americana in marvelous shape, making a
visit to Tuna as fresh and fun as ever. The humor is often just shy of groan
inducing but is always devoid of any sense of superiority or animosity.
These guys love the characters they create and the people they are
lampooning. They poke affectionate fun at themselves rather than standing
aside criticizing and belittling their subjects. This is a put on, not a put
down.
Written by Joe Sears, Jaston Williams and Ed Howard. Design: Kevin
Rupnik (set) Linda Fisher (costumes) Root Choyce (lights) Ken Huncovsky
(sound). Cast: Joe Sears, Jaston Williams. |
| |
|