Studio Theatre - ARCHIVE
Click here to go to this
theater's main page |
|
|
Adding Machine: A Musical
October 14 - November 15, 2009
Wednesday - Saturday at 7:30 pm
Saturday - Sunday at 2:30 pm
Reviewed October 18 by
Brad Hathaway |
A Potomac Stages
Pick for an uncompromising staging of a harsh view of
this life and an afterlife
Running time 1:35 - no intermission
Tickets $57 - $71
Click here to buy the CD
|
Its hard to imagine a better, stronger or more satisfying production of this
unorthodox, unsettling and often unpleasant new musical. From staging to
casting to singing to acting, all the elements work in concert to deliver a
wonderfully unified vision of what is, at its heart, a troubling view of
human existence, the meaning of life and even of afterlife. That having been
said, however, it is only fair to point out that the uncompromising nature
of the material being staged makes for an experience that isn't always
pleasant and isn't meant to be. This is a "shake 'em up" style piece of
social commentary which is true to its source, a 1923 play that was an
exercise in the use of all the elements of theatrical production to shake up
a complacent audience. The co-librettist of the piece, Jason Loewith, comes
to the Potomac Region to direct his musical, which
premiered in his home city of Chicago where it won a Joseph Jefferson Award
for Best New Musical - Chicago's equivalent of a Helen Hayes - and in played
in New
York where it won both Lucille Lortel and Outer Critics Circle Awards.
Storyline: "Mr. Zero" lives down to his name - he's a clerk who has spent
twenty-five years adding figures six days a week only to be unceremoniously
terminated on his anniversary. In response, he does some terminating of his
own which results in a short stay on death row followed by a surprising and,
to him, unsatisfying visit to an afterlife he hadn't imagined.
Elmer Rice's play on which this musical is based is often referred to as
a prime example of what became known as the American Expressionist movement
- think of Eugene O'Neil's The Emperor Jones or Sophie Treadwell's
Machinal. American Expressionism put a populist spin on the dark and
dismal European Expressionism of authors like Frank Wedekind whose own
Spring Awakening has recently been musicalized with a somewhat more
audience pleasing touch as it adopted the concepts of rock music for its
youth-oriented theme. No such popularizing in the musical department here.
Joshua Schmidt's music is uncompromisingly belligerent and only once in the
hour and a half does it break into what Stephen Sondheim famously parodied
as a "hum-a-mum-a-mum-able melody."
The performance of David Benoit as the luckless adder who can be replaced
by a machine is superb when he's roaring mad. He comes across as a huge hulk
of a man even if he isn't too tall or too heavy. He just dominates in the
scenes where his anger and frustration is at a peak. There are other scenes,
however, when a touch of charm sneaks in which seems a bit off kilter.
Joanne Schmoll is his shrewish wife, with vocal material to match. She
delivers the screeches of her songs with just the scratches-on-a-blackboard
tonality that the material demands. Kristen Jepperson has something of a
break out role as fellow toiler in obscurity who would kill herself to be
with Benoit's "Mr. Zero." Both Stephen Gregory Smith and Dan Via are
impressive - Smith as a prisoner who thinks he's even more evil than Mr.
Zero and Via as all the smoothly smarmy authority figures in all of Zero's
worlds.
A bleak and grey world is given some depth in Debra Booth's set design
through touches of brown until the action transfers to "A Pleasant Place" in
the afterworld. Then there are greens and even a touch of gold. The early
predominance of grey makes the single splotch of red blood on Benoit's
collar a badge, not necessarily of courage but of something primal. Behind the
audience in Studio's rough-hewn experimental space on the fourth floor is
Alex Tang leading a trio of two keyboards and percussion, the sound of which
fills the space very well. When the quartet of supporting players (Joe Peck,
Katie Nigsch, Thomas Adrian Simpson and Channez McQuay) add their voices to
the sound of the trio, the effect is not melodious, because that isn't what
the score requires, but it is certainly impressive and commanding of respect.
Music by Joshua Schmidt. Libretto by Jason Loewith and Joshua Schmidt.
Based on the play The Adding Machine by Elmer Rice. Directed by Jason Loewth.
Musical direction by Christopher Youstra. Design: Debra Booth (set) Ivania
Stack (costumes) Michael Lincoln (lights) Neil McFadden (sound) Scott
Suchman (photography) John Keith Hall (stage manager). Cast: David Benoit,
Kristen Jepperson, Channez McQuay, Katie Nigsch, Joe Peck, Joanne Schmoll,
Thomas Adrian Simpson, Stephen Gregory Smith, Dan Via. Musicians: Alex Tang,
Mary Sugar, Mark Carson. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
Moonlight
September 9 - October 18, 2009
Wednesday – Saturday and selected Tuesdays at 8 pm
Sunday at 7 pm
Saturday – Sunday and Selected Tuesdays at 2
Reviewed September 13 by
Brad Hathaway |
Proof that fascinating does not equal
understandable
Running time 1:10 – no intermission
Tickets $42 - $63
Click here to buy the
script |
Here's a case of superb performances in an impressive production that
suffers from an excess of ambiguity in the text. Oh, sure, the play by one
of the most literate of modern playwrights, Harold Pinter, is about
mortality. That’s pretty easy to figure out since the central character is
on his death bed. It's also about familial bonds – or the lack thereof.
That’s plain from the opening line “Where are the boys?” That question
is never really answered, however. The boys don't get to the bedside, but they aren’t
trying to. Such is the tie that fails to bind this family together. Joy Zinoman's staging is as sharp and distinct as could be wanted, but where, when, who and why all this is on
the stage is never really clear in this one-act exercise. Instead, for just
over an hour, the work of
Ted van Griethuysen, Tom Story, Catherine Flye and four other quality actors
is kept in balance by Zinoman's sense of pacing and placement in an
energetic if ambiguous sequence of individually interesting events.
Storyline: A retired civil servant is confined to a hospital bed while his
wife sits a bedside vigil. Their conversation makes clear that each believes
he’s about to die. Meanwhile, his two sons who want to be anywhere
but the sick room battle and banter with each other, his daughter
hovers above (either viewing from afar or, perhaps, from beyond her own
grave) and a man and a woman from outside the family fill in some details
from the family’s past.
Van Griethuysen makes a very vital invalid. Confined to
a hospital bed, at least when anyone is looking (he’s not above jumping out
to get to an out-of-reach bottle of whiskey) his speech is sharp, his
delivery an acerbic brew of vitriol and his body never seems to be in repose
except when sleep takes over. When he’s
most awake, he is constantly aware of his environment and his own body,
touching himself in the way a toddler might as the cycle of life completes
itself. He’s fascinating to watch and his acting
choices are so clear that they give you much to mull over. For instance,
just why does he bare his backside en route to the bottle? As is almost
always the case with this gifted actor, every word is fully understandable
and every emotion is communicated clearly. What it adds up to, on the other
hand, remains obscure.
The verbal battle between Tom Story and Anatol Yusef, as
the two missing sons, is another tableau to fascinate but not inform. It
isn’t even clear just where they are: an adjoining bedroom or half a world
away – is the line about being “a few Krugerrands short” a clue to geography
or just a slang insult? All we know for sure is that they aren’t with good
old dad. Sybil Lines, as his wife, is with him both physically and
emotionally, but is awfully bland next to the
flamboyant soon-to-be-corpse. Libby Woodbridge is suitably “ghostly” as the
daughter who seems anxious to see her dad – but will their reunion be on
this side of his grave or the other side?
The production feels serious from even before the show
begins. No curtain separates Debra Booth's set from the audience – a
blackout allows the actors to take their places to begin the performance.
That set captures the lines of the Metheny Theatre without imitating its
wooden surfaces. As is so often the case at Studio, the auditorium and the
set blend when the lights come up so that there’s the feeling of being in
the same space as the actors. Intimate theater is a specialty of the house.
Written by Harold Pinter. Directed by Joy Zinoman.
Design: Debra Booth (set) Helen Q. Huang (costumes) Michael Philippi
(lights) Michael Gallant (incidental music) Gil Thompson (sound) Carol Pratt
(photography) John Keith Hall (stage manager). Cast: Catherine Flye, Ted van
Griethuysen, Sybil Lines, James Slaughter, Tom Story, Libby Woodbridge,
Anatol Yusef. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
Radio Golf
May 20 - July 19, 2009
Wednesday - Saturday and select Tuesdays at 8 pm
Saturday and Sunday at 2 pm;
Sunday at 7 pm
Reviewed May
10 by
David Siegel |
Bittersweet, disarming and
stinging in parts, but a lean final August Wilson installment
Running time 2:20 - one intermission
Performances in the Mead Theatre
Tickets $41 - $61
Click here to buy the script |
This final installment of the majestic, potent ten play odyssey by August
Wilson focusing on the African-American experience in 20th
Century America is a bittersweet, ultimately lean evening. Radio Golf
contains disarming, stinging confrontations about the struggle to keep a
community’s roots alive against the onslaught of progress in this tale of
resentments and grievances in long ago 1997 when it seemed the economy might
lift everyone up. Here the struggles are visually depicted with the dueling
images of Tiger Woods and Martin Luther King Jr. casting their potent forces
upon the proceedings. Situated between their images is a man who thinks he
knows the right path, but finds his way blocked and skidding along. And his
own poster image bears a striking resemblance to the iconic one of President
Obama. For those familiar with the Wilson saga this is a must see: a chance
to grab at his last words. For those accustomed to the mystical matriarch,
Aunt Ester, as the repository of traditions, Radio Golf presents a
sad, inglorious passing as she is represented not by breathing flesh and
blood but as a ghost of a worn-out, unlived-in house considered a blight.
Unfortunately, this final chapter in a 100 year saga has too many set
pieces, keeping it from cooking into a spicy, thick, pungent, savory stew.
The characters seem as if animated arch types from which arguments emanate,
rather than fully-formed individuals with emotional centers. Under Ron
Himes' direction, the cast has perplexingly few sharp edges given the
agonizing about destruction of values. Verbal fireworks do come as the
audience is slapped about and asked to choose between life styles
represented by the words “Negro” and “Nigger.” At the center of it all is
Walter Coppage projecting a soft-spoken, well-dressed, hard-to-anger,
well-educated, African-American real-estate developer turned Pittsburgh
mayoral candidate. He's learning that his allies are fleeting, his power
limited, his trajectory is going backwards and his wife is weighing her own
options. He is trying not to go limp and spineless as the unforgiving White
dominated world places a target on his back. He drinks from a Starbucks cup
when he really needs a meal from Ben’s Chili Bowl.
Storyline: In a run-down storefront in
Pittsburgh’s deteriorating Hill District, mayoral candidate Harmond Wilks
works out the logistics of a redevelopment project that will raze the
decaying buildings of a primarily African-American neighborhood and bring in
chain retailers. All that stands in his way is an old house and its
eccentric owner, an elderly man who refuses to be cleared out.
August Wilson completed Radio Golf just a few
months before he died in 2005. He sets his marker down clearly, asking the
audience which side are they on as the bulldozers are at the ready. Your
reviewer can only wonder what might have been without death on his mind and
with more time to possibly further refine this work. There is a feel of a
rush to the characters moving forward quickly into their positions to
surround the central character forcing him to react to their views and
society whims. Ron Himes is the Founder and Producing Director of The Black
Rep, a professional African-American theatre company. For Radio Golf
there is a reticence in his approach, as if there is a line over which the
actors cannot and should not cross. They contain themselves in small spaces.
A screw driver held in a hand to open a can of paint is the greatest
physical menace, while a finger full of white paint becomes war paint on a
face as the most visual sign of fury. Even when going “all manly,” the
actors seem to be holding back from clenched fists, tight cheeks and spit.
The relationship between husband and wife seems coolly professional, giving
little hint of sexual energy.
Erik Kilpatrick infuses his street-smart, fast-talking
handyman, ex-con of a character with hard earned life experiences and
survival skills. He stirs the pot of this plot with the tough questions of
what it means to be yourself when faced with a larger community out to do
harm to the essence of an urban community about to be destroyed to make way
for the likes of Whole Foods and Starbucks. He presents the image of
physical power never raising a fist to make his presence felt, but forces
others to consider and re-consider their positions. Frederick Strother is
marvelous as the eccentric old man, seemingly one to be toyed with, who uses
his street smarts to out-flank the men in suits by bobbing-and-weaving. He
takes blows, but his resilience has him re-appear much to the chagrin of the
moneyed and educated. Deidra LaWan Starnes is Wilks' wife and professional
advisor. With her flashing eyes she is the most dramatically emotive of the
cast as she learns her value to others is based on the value others place
upon her husband. Then again, her interpersonal chemistry with Coppage is
unfeverish, they seem an unlikely sexual paring. Kim Sullivan is the most
ruthless as a man willing to do anything to make a buck including let his
best friend and own community be skewered. It is his golfing radio
commentary that gives this play its name. He is an impeccable snake.
The Mead Theatre set is a cluttered storefront looking
outward to the street. Used metal desks and chairs are strewn about along
with files, and boxes are scattered here and there which gives a sense of
lived in reality. Lighting moves the show through bright middays, dark
nights and sullen moments. The costumes and shoes of Starnes change in each
scene, but are always tailored and looking a marvel. Coppage and Sullivan are
nattily attired in suits while Kilpatrick and Strother are in
character-rendering outfits. The pre-show and scene changing music moves
from toe-tapping bright rhythm and blues and urban pop through the Jimmy
Hendricks rendition of the Star Spangled Banner.
Written by August Wilson. Directed by Ron Himes. Design:
Daniel Conway (set) Reggie Ray (costumes) Colin K. Bills (lights) Neil
McFadden (sound) Scott Suchman (photography) Katherine C. Mielke
(stage manager). Cast: Walter Coppage, Erik Kilpatrick, Deidra LaWan
Starnes, Frederick Strother, Kim Sullivan. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
The Year of Magical
Thinking
June 17 – July 12,
2009
Wednesday - Sunday at 7:30 pm;
Saturday – Sunday at 2:30 pm
Reviewed June 21 by
David Siegel |
A detached, dispassionate solo
performance piece
of survival after the death of loved ones
Running time 1:40 – no intermission
Tickets $41 - $61
Click here to buy the script
Click here to buy the memoir |
How does one survive the arduous time after the death of loved ones? If you
are the un-ruffled Joan Didion, who, for four decades, was a dispassionate
observer of human intimacy, how far you are from throwing yourself onto the
coffin and bewailing God for the losses? For an audience viewing Didion’s
The Year of Magical Thinking, the question might be; is the existential
approach to coping what you want to spend your time with? She scripts with
almost clinical detachment, reciting detail upon detail to beat back
depression without a mention of the Divine. Or perhaps she replaces a
God-like presence with a different type of authority, that of mysterious and
miraculous spirits. In this one-woman show, God - or something akin to such
an entity - has been replaced not just with mysterious sprits to explain the
unexplainable, but with a survival technique creating an almost fairy-tale
of facts hoping that knowing and following the rules will be a protective
factor and that bad things will not happen or can be reversed.
Writers are
always selling somebody out, Didion suggested long ago. In this theatrical
work written originally as a book after the death of her husband and then
her daughter, Didion sells herself out as so cool a character that
losing control even for a split second seems a weakness of character to be
rarely displayed and then quickly overridden. Under the direction of Serge
Seiden and Joy Zinoman, Helen Hedman has the demanding task of touching an
audience when the script is not so touching. She alone must carry the weight
of the evening, describing a certain kind of grief and mourning. That Hedman
succeeds is a testament to her infusing her character with some warmth
through the slightness of gestures. Is she Didion in appearance? Not so
much. But so what? What matters is Hedman slowly taking over the stage as
she talks directly to us, explaining what to expect as death takes a loved
one away. How you respond may well be determined by your own deep beliefs.
Storyline: After the death of her husband and her daughter, Joan Didion
distilled her grief into a memoir. Her adaptation of that work for the stage
features a single actress and Didion’s chiseled prose.
Joan Didion was born in 1934. The original book The Year
of Magical Thinking won the 2005 National Book Award and Pulitzer Prize.
Her own adaptation into a theatrical production premiered in New York in
March, 2007 running for 144 total performances with Vanessa Redgrave, who was
nominated for a 2007 Tony Award as Best Actress in a Play and won a Drama
Desk Award for Solo Performance. With Year of Magical Thinking.
Didion placed herself under her own intense gaze. As she says in the opening
lines of the text, she wrote to inform others which she does in with an
unblinking memory as a chronicler. It is a shifting account. The melding of
two deaths that can be a bit muddy at times as she moves back and forth to
present aspects of her love for her husband and her daughter. She is a keen
observer of little bits and pieces. One line gives a sense of others; she
asks as she calls in her husband’s obituary to the LA Times, “Is he
dead in pacific coast time since it is 3 hours earlier?” Directors Serge
Seiden and Joy Zinnoman have created a work with fluid movements. Scenes
appear as Hedman finds places to sit or stand with short bites of
violins and piano music by Eric Shimelonis flooding feelings into the
production. This is a tough production about thorny matters, but under their
direction, the humanity does come through.
Helen Hayes Award nominee Helen Hedman - a veteran of
dozens upon dozens of productions in the Potomac Area for the likes of
Arena, Olney, Signature and the Shakespeare Theatre Company - is the guide
on this journey. She leads the audience by the hand with a warm pleasant
voice that shoulders the entire burden, and remains affecting over the course
of the evening. She can be so detached, her breathing level, her voice not
rising, rarely smiling even with her little slight, off-hand humor. Yet she
finds means and methods to show tidbits of emotion. While the performance
moves along, there are quieter moments when Hedman’s face can tighten, as
she twists her hands and fingers, or far from daintily almost crumples into
a chair. She fits a social worker’s description of the real-life Didion,
"one cool character." She take an audience that is willing to listen on this
profound interior trip, bearing witness so that an audience might save it to
remember when it is their turn to live through such time.
The Metheny Theatre stage set is almost architectural …
framed by a maple veneered structure with French blue tinted light
surrounding at curtain up. Spots that Hedman unerringly finds are used to
depict scene changes. There is a large high back rattan arm chair with a
small circular rattan table on audience right and a smaller rattan settee on
audience left. Behind the chair is a black and white abstract painting; sort
of black squiggles as a motif on a white canvas … giving a sense of no color
as when all color leaves the body of a deceased. Brandee Mathies dresses
Hedman in an outfit of a cowl neck cashmere white sweater with full sleeves,
black pencil-thin pants with loafers, and of course, the Didion trademark
big sunglasses.
By Joan Didion. Directed by Serge Seiden and Joy Zinoman.
Design: Luciana Stecconi (set) Brandee Mathies (costumes) Collin K. Bills
(lights) Eric Shimelonis (sound and original music) Carol Pratt
(photography) Che Wernsman (stage
manager). Cast: Helen Hedman. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
Rock 'n' Roll
April 22 - June 28, 2009
Tuesday - Saturday at 8 pm
Saturday at 2 pm
Sunday at 2 pm and 7 pm
Reviewed April 26 by
Brad Hathaway |
A wordy clash of cultures drama
Running time 2:45 - one intermission
Performances in the Milton Theatre
Tickets $34 - $61
Click here to buy the script |
Joy Zinnoman continues her effort to bring major works of Tom Stoppard to
Studio. Rep Stage,
CENTERSTAGE, Longacre Lea, and
MetroStage have all taken a crack at Stoppard
works over the years. Indeed, the lovely light side of Stoppard is on
display right now at MetroStage with his translation of Gérald Sibleyras'
Heroes which we designated a Potomac Stages
Pick. Folger will take up Arcadia in May. Of all
the Stopparding companies in the Potomac Region, however, it is Studio and
its Artistic Director Zinnoman that have given us the widest possible view
of the playwright who is a major voice in modern theater. With
Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern Are Dead, Indian Ink and The Invention of
Love, the company has surveyed his output with striking productions.
With this, his 2006 wordfest, she again gives the material its due with a
sharp cast led by Ted van Griethuysen giving pleasurable performances. The
play isn't his most memorable, but it rewards concentration with verbal
riches of its own.
Storyline: A British academic who is proud to be not only of the left but
a communist tries to cope with the ever-shrinking influence of his school of
thought, the aging of his world and the new challenges of youth, while one of
his students, a refugee from Czechoslovakia, returns home to be with his own
country in the hour of its need when the Soviet Union clamps down on its
liberalizing satellite state. The young student's devotion to Rock 'n' Roll is
the linking mechanism as the play spans the tumultuous times from 1968 to
1990 in England and Czechoslovakia.
Stoppard's personal history shapes this play. He was born in
Czechoslovakia and his family fled repression first from the Nazis in
Eastern Europe and then from the Japanese in Singapore, driving his family
(minus his father who died in a Japanese prison camp) first to India and
then to England. It was Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead that
catapulted him into playwriting prominence in 1966 and earned him the
first of his four Tony Awards. Studio's string of successes with his work
began with Indian Ink which was the Helen Hayes Award winning outstanding
play of 2000 and continued with The Invention of Love which earned both Ted
van Griethuysen and Tom Story nominations for outstanding actor of 2002.
Now van Griethuysen returns to Stoppard in a role that gives him every
opportunity to draw both laughs and sorrow mixed with a healthy dose of
exasperation. He is, as he almost always is, a pleasure to watch, but he
doesn't dominate the stage thanks to a strong set of colleagues. Stafford
Clark-Price makes an impressive local debut in the role of the Czech whose
love of his homeland is (almost) equal to his love of rock 'n' roll. Also
making a smashing first impression on the Studio stage is Caroline Bootle as
a Czech student who, during a fascinating debate over the kitchen table,
takes the position that summarizes the question explored by the entire play. She
maintains that "'Make love not war' was more important than "Workers of the
world unite." Lawrence Redmond offers a sharp rendition of a frightening
interrogator who doesn't seem to require waterboarding to get his captive to
concentrate on the topic at hand. There is some doubling among the
less-than-central characters which requires you to break your concentration
on story and language from time to time to sort out the who's who of this
time and continent spanning story.
A location and time shifting play like this one requires a set design
that can make the shifts effortlessly, clearly and quickly which is
precisely what Russell Metheny provides. Setting up the Milton in a "theater
in the round" configuration and using the aisles as tracks for sliding set
pieces, the space is always handsome but rarely draws attention to itself.
Similarly, Helen Huang's costumes help make the shifts clear by being time
and place appropriate but not distractingly theatrical. The design allows
the audience to place its concentration right where it needs to be, on
Stoppard's flow of verbiage which must be deciphered to follow his story.
Written by Tom Stoppard. Directed by Joy Zinnoman. Design: Russell
Metheny (set) Erik Trester (projections) Helen Q. Huang (costumes) Michael
Giannitti (lights) Gil Thompson (sound) Scott Suchman (photography)
John Keith Hall (stage manager). Cast: David Agranov, Caroline Bootle,
Veronica del Cerro, Stafford Clark-Price, Ted van Griethuysen, Lisa Harrow,
David Chandler Hasty, Katie Henney, Adam Pribila, Richard Price, Lawrence
Redmond, Sarah Strasser, Jay Sullivan, Emily Townley, Alex Vernon, Michael
Wright, Alex Zavistovich.
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
Stoop Stories
March 20 - April 12, 2009
Wednesday - Saturday at 8 pm
Sunday at 7 pm
Saturday - Sunday at 2 pm
Thursday April 2 at 11 am
Reviewed March 22 by
Brad Hathaway |
t
A Potomac Stages
Pick for fascinating glimpses
into life
on the streets of Harlem
Running time 1:00 - no intermission
Tickets $34 - $61 |
The term "self consciously poetic" is precisely the correct one to describe
this entertaining, fascinating and inviting short presentation. This isn't a
negative phrase. Being self consciously poetic is part of the great strength
of this piece - a piece that has a number of great strengths. Dael
Orlandersmith's choice of words is surgically precise and artistically
effective. She can communicate more in a short burst of syllables than many
playwrights can in a succession of pages. Each word simultaneously reflects
the personality of a character, the world in which that character exists,
his or her reaction to that world and the essence of the event at issue.
Orlandersmith delivers her own words in this solo show. She's a warm,
welcoming, human presence that puts the audience at ease through her own
comfort with the world of the stage, and the stories she chooses to tell of
life on the stoops of the row houses of Harlem range from interesting to
fascinating.
Storyline: One observant and poetically gifted woman paints word-pictures of
the people in her world of Harlem and the West Village in New York, those
neighborhoods where people congregate on their stoops.
I'm not quite
sure what a "Consulting Director" might be, but veteran director Jo Bonney
has that credit on this production. I assume that means that she did more
than just direct Orlandersmith's script, and that she probably had a
consultant-style hand in developing the script in the first place. How this
might differ from the traditional role of a hands-on director working on the
premiere of a play with the playwright still striving to make her play all
that it can be is not quite clear. However, there is a seamlessness to the
final product that indicates that playwright/performer/director were of a
single mind as to the purpose of the production. Whatever job title these
creators chose, the results are thoroughly satisfying for the audience and
that's all that really matters.
Words! Orlandersmith chooses words the way a painter chooses colors or a
composer chooses notes. She uses them to communicate in a very few minutes
the essence of an experience. She doesn't just tell a story. Take her tale
of an elderly man and his brief encounter with a famous person. In a very
few minutes we get to know this man, his history as a Jew who survived the
Nazi camps and his life in his adopted country of America. But we learn
much more. The celebrity he encounters is none other than Billie Holiday and
the occasion is a momentous moment in her short, tragic life. Orlandersmith's delivery of a few lines from the lyric to "Strange Fruit" is
as valid a piece of acting as Holiday's delivery of the same words was a
fabulous piece of blues singing. At another point in this solo performance
piece she turns her own talent at "Word Jazz" toward the communication genre
of the late fifties of that name -- and she does it as well as
any of its practitioners.
Studio Theatre has a tradition of including information in the program
which helps the audience understand some of the references within the play
being presented. Often there is a collection of trivia from the time and
place of the story which makes witnessing the play just a bit richer. This
time out they provide a note from Sarah Wallace, who acted as dramaturg on
the project, and her text is not as helpful as it might be. Instead of details
on Harlem, its history and the lay of its land, or information on the
geography and time covered by the play, she delivers a description of the
play itself, something the audience is about to witness for themselves and
for which they don't need a guide. Orlandersmith is the guide.
Written and performed by Dael Orlandersmith. Consulting direction by Jo
Bonney. Design: Luciana Stecconi (set) Brandee Mathies (costume) Colin K.
Bills (lights) Eric Shimelonis (sound) Matt Goldenberg (photography) Renee
E. Yancey (stage manager).
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
|
January 14 - February 22, 2009
The Seafarer
Reviewed January 18 by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:30 - one intermission
An Irish tale of a visit from the devil with fun performances by Floyd King
and Edward Gero
Click here to buy the script |
When Studio Theatre sent us a photo to illustrate this review, they picked
one of Floyd King and Edward Gero. How did they know that the review would
concentrate on the pleasure of watching Floyd King and Edward Gero? I mean,
there are three other members of the cast, including Philip Goodwin in a sometimes-nifty
performance of as none other than the devil himself. The
review also has to deal with the script by Conor McPherson and there's even the strengths and weaknesses of
the set by Russell Metheny to discuss. Yet, Studio was quite right in
sending us the photo you see here. As George Gobel said to Lou Costello when he
one-upped him in Christmas decorations, "There's the show!" King, as we all
know, can hold a stage all by himself, and he certainly fills in the slow
moments of this spotty piece of storytelling with a performance that is both
sharp and distinctive as a blind old curmudgeon. Gero comes through as well
as a friend who is blind in another way - in his inebriation he has
misplaced his glasses. The semi-sightless duo is consistently fun to watch
while the rest of the action swirling about them fails to make much of an
impression.
Storyline: On Christmas eve four
down-on-their-luck Irishmen in a small town north of Dublin are visited by a
stranger with special powers willing to gamble at an all-night game of poker
with souls as the ultimate wager.
McPherson won the Olivier Award for Best New Play in London in the 1998
season for his piece of naturalistic storytelling, The Weir, which
was a masterpiece of understatement. It worked whether staged by
high-priced, big-name talent or by dedicated and skilled but hardly well
known actors. His Shining City was well received here at Studio a
little over a year ago under the direction of Joy Zinoman, principally
because of performances by Gero and a trio of strong performers. In both
plays, McPherson let the story emerge in slow, easy pieces, inviting the
audience to put the puzzle together and rewarding their effort with a
satisfying payoff. This latest play by the young Irish author, on the other
hand, telegraphs its tale, leaving the audience little to do but sit and
enjoy the performances. Rather than build to a conclusion that seemed to
emerge naturally from the events in the tale, the payoff here feels
contrived. What is worse, the devil accepts the contrivance with no more
than a shrug - not a very Satanic reaction.
Still, there's nearly two hours of Floyd King. He may overdo a few
mannerisms and once or twice his eyes may signal a glance, but give the guy a
break. Blind is awfully hard to portray on a stage where the audience is as
close to the actor as is the case here in Studio's Mead Theatre. King is
simply fun to watch. And Gero's drunk act is so convincing you can feel the
headache of his hangover. It falls to him to reveal the payoff that ties the
loose ends up at the end, but until then, he's thoroughly convincing and
entertaining. Philip Goodwin's performance as the dapper devil never really
gets the menace beneath the veneer of gentlemanly bonhomie, but he is truly
chilling when he bursts out with one of the most disturbing descriptions of
heaven and hell since Dante. Rounding out the cast are Billy Meleady, as an
overwrought down-on-his-luck relative of King's blind man, and Jeff Allin as the
neighbor who invites the visitor from Hades to the game.
Russell Metheny provides a picture-perfect recreation
of the interior of the house in Baldoyle on the coast of the Irish Sea, but
it is never clear just why the upper wall is transparent, allowing the
audience to see characters in the upstairs hallway. The highly detailed
interior contrasts sharply with the lack of setting for the exterior scenes
played out on a blank space beyond the exterior door stage
right. Helen Huang's costumes enhance the characterizations and Neil
McFadden's sound design plays with the the seasonal aspect of the story
including a double- or even triple-entendre of the opening strains of Johnny
Mathis warbling "do you see what I see?"
Written by Conor McPherson. Directed by Paul Mullins. Design: Russell
Metheny (set) Helen Q. Huang (costumes) Michael Giannitti (lights) Neil
McFadden (sound) Scott Suchman (photography) John Keith Hall (stage
manager). Cast: Jeff Allin, Edward Gero, Philip Goodwin, Floyd King, Billy
Meleady. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 12, 2008 - January 11, 2009
Grey Gardens
Reviewed November 16 by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:25 - one intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for a
superb production of a fascinating,
unorthodox musical
Click here to buy the CD |
A little over a year ago, the producers of the Broadway premiere of this
unorthodox musical which had been nominated for Tony Awards for best
musical, best book and best score closed the show rather than try to find
replacements for the two women who walked away with the year's Tony Awards
for actress and supporting actress. The show had run less than nine months
and was still selling a lot of high priced tickets but no one was sure that
the show could work without the magic of Christine Ebersole and Mary Louise
Wilson. Well, they should have done what Studio Theatre here has done - get
Barbara Walsh and Barbara Broughton to take on the roles and they could have
run for another year. Both Barbaras turn in performances that enchant,
entrance and entertain in a show that takes the most bizarre of stories and
makes it both human and thoroughly musical. Walsh, in the dual role of both of the ladies whose
descent from high society to abject poverty, and Broughton in the single but
captivating role of just one of those ladies, win the audience's affection
as well as admiration as the evening progresses.
Storyline: An unorthodox musical attempts to explain how two wealthy socialites, toasts of Long Island society
who were the
aunt and cousin of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, become reclusive,
near-penniless shut ins in their crumbling "beach cottage" in The Hamptons.
The contrast between the first and second acts couldn't be stronger. Essentially, the second act is a
musicalization of the bizarre documentary that exposed to public view the
reclusive life these women were leading in the midst of the social set at
the end of Long Island in the 1970s. But just making a musical of the strange
spectacle would be the equivalent of turning a "cinéma vérité" documentary
into something akin to Mommie Dearest set to music. Watching what
happened is only fully satisfying if there is an answer to why it happened.
The first act is the attempt by book writer Doug Wright, lyricist Michael
Korie and composer Scott Frankel to present at least an intellectually
satisfying theory that explains the inexplicable. Taking three different
apparent disasters that affected this mother-daughter pair at different
times in their lives, and compressing them into a single day in the mansion
known as Grey Gardens, they posit the view that these women couldn't
effectively cope with the abandonment of the mother by both her philandering
husband and her domineering father as well as the jilting of the daughter by
none other than Joe Kennedy, Jr. The first act is reminiscent of Cole
Porter's High Society, while the second isn't reminiscent of any other
musical.
In the first act Walsh
is Edith Bouvier Beale, the mother of socialite "Little Edie Beale." In the
second, she's "Little Edie" herself some thirty years later. With the help
of a marvelously written script, Walsh makes both characters understandable
as well as fascinating. In her hands, they are more than just freak show
attractions, they are real people with real problems that overwhelm.
Broughton is the mother in the second act, an entertainingly self-absorbed
mother at that. Their interaction explains their abnormalities. But these
aren't the only interesting characters on stage in this musical. Act One's
"Little Edie" is Jenna Sokolowski who turns in one of her best performances
to date - and that's saying a great deal for her stepsister in Olney's
Cinderella ,
her Eve Addaman (as in Adam 'n Eve) in Woolly's
She Stoops To Comedy
and, especially, her innocent Little Sally in Signature's
Urinetown
were marvelous. Bobby Smith gives another audience-winning performance as
the mother's accompanist, and Matthew Stucky is fine as young Joseph Kennedy
Jr in the first act and so much more than fine as the neighbor boy Jerry in
the second. Bruce Coughlin's orchestrations of Frankel's score
were a significant factor in the success of the show in New York as they
created a sonic world of depth and beauty that insinuated itself into the
consciousness. The charts required only nine musicians to work their magic.
Studio has nine effective musicians playing the score here and they cast the
same spell. George Fulginiti-Shakar leads them and Jeff Thurston handles the
seductive string parts on his violin.
Music by Scott Frankel. Lyrics by
Michael Korie. Book by Doug Wright. Based on the film by Albert and David Maysles,
Ellen Hovde, Muffie Meyer and Susan Froemke. Directed by Serge Seiden.
Choreographed by Matthew Gardiner. Musical direction by George
Fulginiti-Shakar. Design: Russell Metheny (set) Alex Jaeger (costumes) Erik
Trester (projections) Michael Lincoln (lights) Gil Thompson (sound) Scott
Suchman (photography) John Keith Hall (stage manager). Cast: Barbara
Broughton, Alison Cenname, James Foster, Jr., Simone Grossman, Ryan
Hilliard, Bobby Smith, Jenna Sokolowski, Matthew Stucky, Barbara Walsh. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
December 3 - 21, 2008
Blackbird
Reviewed December 7 by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 1:20 - no intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for an
explosively emotional experience
Click here to buy the script |
Is it harder to avert your eyes from a train crash or from Jerry Whiddon and
Lisa Joyce‘s exchange of vitriol in David Harrower’s superbly written (but
poorly titled) explosion of a play? I don’t know. I’ve never actually seen a
train crash. But I have seen Whiddon and Joyce go at it for 80 minutes, after
which I almost forgot to applaud as I sat, stunned. It is a mesmerizing,
emotionally draining experience, one that would be hard to forget, if one
actually wanted to forget it. Director David Muse is again responsible for a
production that pulls out all the stops just like his earlier work here
(most notably, the Studio Secondstage production of
Frozen) and on
other Potomac Region stages such as
The Bluest Eye
at Theatre Alliance. Nothing is hidden from view either visually or
emotionally. Muse directs his two players to make the most of the
confrontational aspects and only hint at any reticence either character
might feel even if just momentarily. As a result, this is a full-out, knock
down, drag out battle.
Storyline: A confrontation between a man who thought he’d put scandal
behind him and the woman he wronged many years ago. It takes place in a
filthy employee’s break room, the only space where he can get her away from
his colleagues and find out what, after all these years, she wants of him.
The storyline above is intentionally vague – there are twists and turns in
this verbal battle that I wouldn’t dream of giving away. But if you are too
young to watch in awe as two human beings reveal raw psychological and
sexual wounds, just take my word for it and don’t go. If, on the other hand,
you can take revelations of human frailty and ponder questions of good
versus evil and revenge versus redemption, go. Harrower, a Scottish
playwright who, as a result of this play, is the holder of the Olivier Award
for last year's best new play in London, gives the audience no opportunities
to escape or even catch their collective breath as they take in the
sequential revelations. He provides no easy answers. The script offers
neither condemnation nor absolution. The facts are laid bare - as are the
psyches of both parties. But judgment? That's left to another time and
place.
Jerry Whiddon unleashes his considerable actors’ chops,
proving to those who haven’t seen him perform recently because he’s been so
busy directing since he left his post of Producing Artistic Director at
Round House, an opportunity to appreciate just what they’ve been missing. As
the former evil-doer who thought he’d left all that behind him, he not only
shows all the emotions you would expect, he makes you feel them. His pain is
palpable. His fear is fearsome. His anger is awesome, the emotion of a
trapped animal. Lisa Joyce, who was the young teacher in the National Tour
of Doubt when it played the National, hides some of her characters’
emotions and intentions (just as she’s supposed to) until they are unleashed
one jolting revelation at a time.
Debra Booth has provided a set that draws the audience
into the world of the play just as it thrusts the cast into the presence of
the audience. No proscenium divides the two worlds. The dirty, trashed
employee's lounge with its vending machines, overflowing trash can, detritus
strewn floor and splash-stained frosted window extends about as close to the
front row of seats as possible and the wrap-around seating means that the
audience is constantly aware of the other audience members watching the
confrontation taking place just beyond an arms length. The harsh stark white
light of florescent bulbs add to the sense of reality.
Written by David Harrower. Directed by David Muse.
Design: Debra Booth (set) Kate Turner-Walker (costumes) Michael Philippi
(lights) Neil McFadden (sound) Carol Pratt (photography) Melissa Malinowski
(stage manager). Cast: Lisa Joyce, Jerry Whiddon. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
September 3 - October 26, 2008
The Road to Mecca
Reviewed September 7 by
David Siegel |
Running Time 2: 15 one
intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for a richly
burnished, luxurious production as artistry confronts aging and traditional
community standards
Recipient of the
Usher's
Favorite Show Award for September
Click here to buy the script |
Joy Zinnoman's staging of Athol Fugard's 1984 play is an impeccably polished
construction. From the set design, to the casting to the unexpectedly
non-apartheid-themed script by a playwright most readily known for his
politically themed South African plays, The Road to Mecca is a vision
of unspoiled beauty. It is as if the production was in High Definition, so
that the pixels just pop out as if previously unnoticed; it is that vibrant.
The Road to Mecca is the unfolding story of an aging artist fighting
against loneliness, fear of losing her artistic vitality and facing strict
community standards that cast her as an outsider that must be punished.
While the events are situated in a dusty South African small town, the
location does not matter. Just change the accents. Zinnoman has developed a
very feminine-centered world of shades of color and tints of voice. It is a
world that erupts and quiets and then erupts again ... not to hurt or maim,
but to push and prod: generally with a hug of affection after the
altercation. The audience is in rapt attention from the moment they see the
set, tightly squeezed into the Mead Theater; all chock-a-block full of
artistic inventions, furniture and candles -- lots and lots of candles.
Zinnomen has an uncanny ability to guide and then challenge her actors to
reach for delicate and subtle performances even when they are shouting and
physically imposing themselves on each other, or quietly cowering. There is
no room for a casting error in this three actor production; there is no
place on stage to disappear. With a pair of Helen Hayes awardees Tana
Hicken and Holly Tywford in the two featured roles and Martin Rayner as the
minister representing an entire community, the audience gets all it could
long for and more. This is a luxurious production as secrets are unveiled,
and the timid finally do inherit the earth with a small gesture … the
placing of a shawl on the shoulder of another to provide comfort.
Story Line: An artist reaching her very late 60’s struggles with feelings of
isolation and fear that her muse has deserted her. She engages in a battle
of wills with a rebellious young woman friend as well as a local minister
who represents the traditional community standards. Inspired by the true
story of Helen Martins who created the Owl House in the Eastern Cape of
South Africa, now a national monument.
The internationally renowned Athol Fugard has written
dozens of plays in his 50 years as a playwright, director and actor.
He
fought against South African apartheid with his critically acclaimed theater
works that led to his temporary banishment, but not his silencing. Works
such Blood Knot (1961), Sizwe Banzi is Dead (1972), and Master
Harold and the Boys (1982) are well known in the theater cannon. With
The Road to Mecca, Fugard takes on different demons as he
confronts an artist’s fears of death and worse, the loss of the creative
spirit and reduced energy to fight against a more traditional standard. In
Mecca the playwright has located a womanly muse to represent himself,
inspired by an artist who created sculptures of owls and shrines to Mecca
that caused havoc in her small Christian-faith community … after all, what
could be worse then facing east toward Mecca and its wonders for deep
holders of a traditional Christian point of view? Joy Zinnomen’s touch
illuminates like candles in a hall of mirrors, and is iridescent with
sparkles and glitter. With her cast she has each remain in the moment;
silent, watching, brooding and in character even when not in the spotlight.
With her design team, she has brightened the darkest corner of the script
and the set with unexpected touches of reality.
There is little sense of acting in Mecca.
Twyford and Hicken work together almost as if they lived together for the
past several months -- not just in rehearsal, but in real life, so that they
came to know one another as true caring friends who learned how to fight hard
out of love and respect and then will put a finger to a nose to show
affection. Twyford is all youthful bravado; full of big gestures from the
moment she enters. She takes up space with her body and her voice
pushing out everything else … or at least trying to. But somehow the
audience wonders if she is covering up something deep and hurting with her
boisterous, know it all manner. And yet, with just a little prodding and an
apology, she starts again, still strong but more willing to hear her dear
friend speak. Tana Hicken is a quiet presence; soft and sometimes hidden in
plain sight. Almost meek, an audience will wonder from whence came all her
artistic boldness to take on an entire community given Hicken’s initial
entrance. She is one of tiny, intimate movements of an eye brow, a mouth,
purse of the lips, a tilt of the head. Martin Rayner, first appearing at the
very end of Act I, is all knowing arrogant intellect and fiery faith, but
with his own secret of love missed that he touchingly and finally brings
himself to admit.
Debra Booth’s set is a delicately built wonder of
little warrens of a bedroom, a kitchen and a sitting room; but the warrens
almost have movement to them, so full of furniture, brick-a-brack and
artistic contrivances. It is complex mess of beauty, set off by candles and
oil lamps that, when lit, bring some grace to the entire theater. The
shifting lighting design from day to night only accentuates the effect. The
set, its props and everything about it is actually used during the
performance; nothing is wasted. Water is poured, hair washed, food
prepared, clothes changed and sound of life heard.
Written by Athol Fugard. Directed by Joy Zimmomen.
Debra Booth (set) Helen Q. Huang (costumes) Michael Giannitti (lights) Gil
Thompson (sound) Carol Pratt (photography) Serge Seiden (production
manager). Cast: Tana Hicken, Martin Rayner and Holly Twyford. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 11 - July 6, 2008
This Beautiful
City
Reviewed June 19 by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:30 - one intermission
A musical look at the new evangelical movement |
The off-Broadway troupe called The Civilians offers
a play with music created from interviews with people involved in the
evangelical movement. Written by Steven Cosson and Jim Lewis with music and
lyrics by Michael Friedman, the impact of the piece is akin to a
light-weight musical version of The Laramie Project. In that more
famous interviews-turned-to-script piece, it was a horrific crime rooted in
community bigotry that commanded attention. Here it is a somewhat more
benign community phenomenon. The show deals with the emergence of the evangelical movement as a
defining aspect of a single community's identity fueled by the nation-wide
exposure of televangelism and the development of mega-churches. It isn't a
completely new issue, however. Ever
since at least the time of Aimee Semple McPherson, there has been a bridging
of the gap
between religion and pop culture. With an up-tempo, slightly country
sounding score and bright, energetic performances, the piece is engaging if
not particularly insightful. That, however, is a problem when the purported
purpose of the evening is to provide insight into a current phenomenon.
Storyline: A cast of six perform transcripts from
interviews conducted by the theater group in its search for understanding of
the phenomenon of evangelicalism in a mass communication age. The
concentration is on Colorado Springs, home of mega-church New Life where
founder Ted Haggard made news of a distinctly non-religious type with the
breaking of a prostitution/homosexuality/drug use scandal.
There's a twist in the approach this group takes to the
genre of "documentary theater." (Think of not just The
Laramie Project but of The Vagina Monologues and The Exonerated.)
The Civilians present the results of their interviews with a light, entertaining touch. The range of topics they
have taken up is wide - everything from the role of Presidential wives (Ladies)
to the life of geese (Canard, Canard, Goose?). The tone varies depending on the topic - a cabaret-style look at veracity in pop
culture called (I Am) Nobody's Lunch ("how do we know what we know
when nobody knows if everyone else is lying?") or a frivolous feel for an
examination of things that go missing called, not surprisingly, Gone
Missing.
For this particular outing, The Civilians find a style somewhere between
cabaret and play-with-music. The music consists of about a dozen songs
ranging in style from a near boot-scooting country-ish "Cowboys" to a more
anthem-like paean to "Freedom." Taken together, the score seems to mimic the
"up with people" kind of musical offerings often found on mass-market
televangelist programming. A trio playing keyboard, bass guitar and drums
sits at the side of the stage pumping up the energy when required.
The cast of six forms an ensemble that works together smoothly. No one
performer has a "starring role," but all have plenty of opportunity to
engage the audience and make a mark either as members of one of Colorado
Springs major churches, representatives of the secular side of the town or
even Christian cadets at the nearby Air Force Academy. Each takes
multiple roles as the evening progresses. Most of what has to be said is
said during the first act and it is quite entertaining. By the middle of the
second act, however, it begins to feel like filler and there is more
sermonizing going on in the second than in the first act.
Written by Steven Cosson and Jim Lewis. Music and lyrics
by Michael Friedman. Directed by Steven Cosson. Musical staging by Chase
Brock. Musical direction by Gabriel Mangiante. Design: Debra Booth (set and
projections) Lorraine Venberg (costumes) Michael Giannitti (lights) Erik
Trester (sound) John Keith Hall (stage manager). Cast: Emily Ackerman,
Marsha Stephanie Blake, Aysan Celik, Matthew Dellapina, Brad Heberlee,
Stephen Plunkett. Musicians: Anders Eliasson, Gabriel Mangiante, Robin
Rhodes.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
May 14 - June 22, 2008
The
Internationalist
Reviewed May 18 by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:00 - one intermission
An amusing contemporary comedy of the global community
Click here to buy the script |
"Dim tia. Hag alla pom timin tee fay. Yil seeva saan amhalio pro bimin fee
karal nee -- sits yee amb hen dockt. Gim see fe heyal adana mimca cray
duelits manda eyab saat, gaha neen tomil farlio pit surhanio warra gee sal.
Kilt foit darca bear hantfidia qin garrio sora niy koral hibinimatia dor
kand lor. Kamul eets beddic. Lihurin rol circumstat binda pint. Fits toi,
toya harric, fits harric guradat empt ill inst deen." So says Sara, a
secretary/copy clerk/gopher in the eastern-European office where a young
American has been detailed on a short-term project. This intensely personal
near-confessional is delivered with great earnestness by Tonya Beckman Ross
to the clueless but very attracted American played with a fresh openness by
Tyler Pierce in Kirk Jackson's clean and clear production of a new play by
Anne Washburn. The point is that nothing is at all clear to Pierce's
character because he can't understand the local language. Neither can anyone
in the audience. To make sure of this, playwright Anne Washburn has devised
her own language. She lets the audience understand the conversation of the
Eastern-European characters when the American isn't in the room, but when he
can hear them neither he nor we can understand a word.
Storyline: An American has been detailed to a Middle-European office to
participate in a business project for a short time. Suffering at first from
exhaustion after a sixteen hour flight, he has difficulty figuring out the
positions of each of the members of the team. Jet lag gets worse and worse
as he suffers from insomnia, adverse reactions to food and drink and an ever
escalating feeling of disorientation. It isn't helped when a crisis hits the
team and the local members, in their concentration on the emergency, have
less and less time to try to help him become a contributor.
It isn't just the language the audience can't understand. They also never
have a chance to understand the nature of the project the team is working on,
or, for that matter, the nature of the problem or fraud that is affecting
its prospects. That's not what the show is about. It is about communication
and co-existence in its absence. In an increasingly global community, where
corporations span political borders with different portions of joint efforts
being conducted through electronic connections, communication across
cultural and language borders is more and more a common problem. It isn't
just when one participant doesn't understand a word used by another. Culture
is more than mere language. Attitudes, presumptions and the store of
background information can be stumbling blocks as well. Washburn makes these
points entertainingly, but stumbles a bit with some of the more outlandish
elements of the plot including an ill-structured scene of an encounter with
a prostitute, and a strangely unexplained decision on the part of the
fatigued American to go sightseeing alone instead of falling into his bed
for some much needed sleep.
Washburn's invented language - she says that it is "one-third
Romance language, one-third Turkish or Middle Eastern and one-third Asian" -
presents the cast with an unusual challenge. They must converse in this
structured nonsense as if it is completely meaningful and appears to be
their native tongue. Any stumbling about as might be the case with a
"foreign" language would break the spell. They do a fabulous job of it. They
also, by opening night, seem to have committed their lines to memory with
greater success than is often the case in other theaters where opening night
fluffs are often overlooked. When Holly Twyford, Cameron McNary and
Jason Lott chatter away, telling apparently hysterical stories on their
lunch break, or panic over whatever the crisis it is that hits their project,
they seem totally comfortable in the patois. What is more, they listen to
each other and appear to understand each element of the conversation, taking
in the information offered at the speed it is flowing.
The production has more than just the presence of Tyler Pierce to remind
long time Studio Theatregoers of
Fat Pig or of Holly
Twyford to recall The
Shape of Things. In both of these cases, the ultra-modern
streamlined set work of Debra Booth, the sharply focused lighting of Michael
Giannitti and the mod-pop musical choices and strongly reinforced sounds of
Neil McFadden have created an environment that reflects the contemporary
scene. Each is certainly capable of producing different looks and sounds (as
they have either together or separately) in other productions. But this feel
is particularly good for this type of show and they do a fine job keeping
the play flowing from airport to office to restaurant to bar and back.
Written by Anne Washburn. Directed by Kirk Jackson. Design: Debra Booth
(set) Jenny Mannis (costumes) Michael Giannitti (lights) Neil McFadden
(sound) Carol Pratt (photography) Serge Seiden (stage manager). Cast: James
Konicek, Jason Lott, Cameron McNary, Tyler Pierce, Tonya Beckman Ross, Holly
Twyford. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
March 26 - June 1, 2008
The History Boys
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 3:00 - one
intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick as better than
Broadway
Click here to buy the script |
When you're right, you're right. And we were right. When we reviewed the
original production
of this play on Broadway we said "Those
who are familiar with the kind of serious contemporary drama that Studio
does so well should hope that" this play makes its way into its schedule.
Well, it has. And this well constructed comedy/drama that raises
pertinent issues in this age of controversy over "teaching to the test" is
in the proper hands. Director Joy Zinoman, her design team and her duo of
featured teachers manage to surpass the marvelous original production of
Alan Bennett's sterling play which garnered the Olivier Award for Best Play
when it premiered in London, and the Tony Award for Best Play when it opened
on Broadway. Floyd King gives a lovely performance as the devotee of
education for education's sake, with just a touch of Goodbye Mr. Chips
added to the combination of intellectual role model and free spirit embedded
in the script. As his polar opposite, the young teacher who sees his role as
one of preparing young minds for the rigors of collegiate and career
competition, Simon Kendall is sharp and energetic. He makes the apologias
for practicality in educational institutions that Alan Bennett penned for
his character ring true. For the boys of the title, the eight young actors
Zinoman selected are superb - especially Jay Sullivan and Owen Scott.
Storyline: In the mid-1980s the headmaster at the British equivalent of a
high school brings in a teacher he feels will put the proper emphasis on
preparation for the "A-Level Exams" which, like our SATs, determine the
collegiate opportunities of the seniors. His style contrasts sharply with
that of a long-time member of the faculty whose emphasis is on learning for
the love of learning. A class of eight young men are caught between them
until the older teacher is spied taking inappropriate liberties with one of
his boys.
Alan Bennett first came to
fame in the revue Beyond the Fringe nearly fifty years ago (with
Dudley Moore and Peter Cook), and has earned awards for both performing and
writing ever since. As you would expect, he fills this script with witty one-liners, but also with serious issues. It is that combination that makes the
piece so satisfying. As soon as you think you are rolling along with a comic
riff, it reaches a punch line that is more thoughtful than mirthful, and
then, just as things start to get a bit heavy, there is a burst of laughter
to release the pressure. When all is said and done, there's plenty to talk
about on the way home. You discuss the issues raised, from the
purpose of education to the proper procedure to deal with improper behavior
by teachers with their students. Or, you can consider the quality of the
production itself.
Among the things Zinoman gets right in her
re-envisioning of the play (no slavish imitation of someone else's success
here) is the casting of Floyd King in the role that earned Richard Griffiths
both Olivier and Tony Awards, that of the truly avuncular teacher who cares
more for his students' education than their preparation for the exams that
determine their college and career futures. The choice of King was a bit
surprising to those who expected a Griffiths knock off. He's such a
different physical "type." It might well have been interesting to see what
the play would have been in other hands - Ted van Griethuysen would have
made a more traditional choice and his performance would have definitely
been outstanding. But King brings a different persona to the piece,
simultaneously softening this key personality and shifting the focus of the
play just a bit more toward the boys of the title. Kendall turns out to have
also been an excellent choice. Neither of the other two adult roles get
performances of significant quality. Tana Hicken doesn't quite "nail" the
fabulous speech she's given in the second act and James Slaughter's
"headmaster" seems a bit distracted rather than focused on the demand for
results from his staff. Ah, but the younger performers who have more funny
lines and less multifaceted personalities. Each comes across as a distinct
individual and the ensemble works well together.
A major improvement over the London/Broadway
production that was such a success is in the set design. Bob Crowley's Tony
winning design for the original involved distracting and noisy moving walls
and had harsh florescent light fixtures partially intruding into the black
and white movie projected on the back wall. Russell Metheny, on the other
hand, has a nifty portal that glides silently across the stage, rotating
smoothly into position to form doors
and define walls creating locales for different scenes. The dispensing of the use of film entirely
solves the sightline problem.
Written by Alan Bennett. Directed by Joy Zinoman.
Design: Russell Metheny (set) Alex Jaeger (costumes) Michael Lincoln
(lights) Gil Thompson (sound) Scott Suchman (photography) John Keith Hall
(stage manager). Cast: Ben Diskant, Chris Dinolfo, Tana Hicken, Andrew
Honeycutt, Floyd King, Simon Kendall, Jeremy Lister, James Thomas Martin,
Dominique Morizet, Adam Poss, Robert Rector, Owen Scott, James Slaughter,
Nick Stevens, Matthew Stucky, Jay Sullivan. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
April 1 - 20, 2008
The New Absurd |
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for a pair of
unique theatrical experiences |
New York based performance group, rainpan 43, presents three shows in repertory: all wear bowlers, Amnesia
Curiosa and machines
machines machines machines machines machines. We have
reviewed only two of them because machines, machines, machines, machines, machines, machines, machines is a short run of just
the weekend of April 19-20, but each of the two is such a delight while so
distinct from the other, that we've made the repertory a Potomac Stages
Pick. It clearly meets the criteria of material "so good we are confident that a majority of our
readers would thank us for recommending they take the time and trouble (not
to mention the expense)" to see it.
|
Amnesia Curiosa
Reviewed April 9 by
David Siegel |
Running time 1:15 - no intermission
A cerebral, lovely evening of connected vignettes
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for a pair of
unique theatrical experiences |
A quiet little jewel waltzed into Studio Theatre the other evening; an old
fashioned kind of show that will suck you in until, 75 short minutes later,
you leave with a warm feeling of having been entertained. Not educated. Not
blown-away. Not wishing it had been longer. But quietly entertained in an
often touching manner by Trey Lyford and Geoff Sobelle. From the moment you
enter the theater space you know you will be in for something different. You
don’t head to a waiting seat, but go through a curious little old-fashioned
19th century type museum of miniature objects and photographs
dedicated to “fleeting” memory and the “preservation of memory.” Lyford and
Sobelle's quietly animated words are caught and savored throughout the
production as they move through a number of short vignettes depicting
distant events that run the gamut of very affecting physical comedy,
fleeting magical sightings, and pantomime (not done in white grease-paint).
This is a lovely evening of how a hand becomes a dying bird, later
resurrected to a living and fluttering bird; how a ball of string can become
a violin or disappear magically into a small pile of sand; or how stick-on
mustaches can be hysterically placed perfectly on an upper lip to change a
character’s affection in a nano-second; or how voice modulation can give
rise to cackling from an audience that is normally cool and sophisticated.
An evening with rainpan 43’s Amnesia Curiosa is like being a 10 year
old again and that is a good thing … a very good thing.
Storyline: Connected small vignettes about long
lost ephemeral memories and moments of family life in an old-style,
museum-type atmosphere.
Lyford and Sobelle
worked with playwright Andrew Dawson to develop this memory play that places
the audience in the midst of an old-style carnival type atmosphere. The
production was first staged at the Philadelphia Live Arts festival in 2006.
It begins with a barker using a megaphone to entice the audience to open
their minds to what they may see over the course of the evening. Vignettes
are connected by the sense that memory is continually lost and that adults
are unaware of the coming losses. A number of the vignettes include silent
body and transformative facial movements that leave the audience in awe.
Others are the more dumb-and-dumber comic type. Several are poignant, such
as a boy finding a dying bird, or a grandmother in the final phase of her of
life, or a husband and wife distanced by the Vietnam War. The script has a
sweet feel for the human condition rather than a shrieking, cracking-up,
making fun of human fragilities. Director Gabriel Quinn Bauriedel has a mime
background as well as experience and education in physical-centered theater
that it is noticeable throughout the production. His direction allows the
actors to take center stage together and separately. His work seems
invisible and that is a complement.
Lyford and Sobelle are performers with
strong voices, rubber faces and elastic bodies and limbs and a clear and
easy presence on stage. Both deliver their lines in a straight-up manner.
Lyford is the one with a rubber face and Sobelle the one with the elastic
body. Together they work seamlessly to lull the audience into a calm place
from which to take them to a never-land of family narratives. There
is no hyper kinetic energy with them, but rather a slow-motion type of
movement and language so that nothing can be missed. Each of the actors has
the opportunity to showcase his comic skills both silently and otherwise.
And each gets to play very poignant scenes. Lyford’s work as a father
separated from his wife by the Vietnam war and listening to voices on a
reel-to-reel tape recorder is of the highest quality. Sobelle’s work as a
grandmother (as depicted by just one arm) slowly losing her mind is also of
high quality. In Amnesia Curiosa Lyford and Sobelle take the audience
along with them until they have circled around and returned to the opening
scene once again, but with each having changed places from the top of the
show. With this first-rate work the audience leaves the performance
perfectly satiated.
The Studio’s Mead Theatre set is a
wonder from first walking through a museum-like set-up to the uses of placed
objects and curios which are showcased, for the most part in dark heavy
wooden cabinets with glass doors or under plastic boxes. The set will bring
either a smile or a quizzical look. Over the course of the performance, the
objects all find a place and connection to what is seen and experienced,
whether a plain old ball of string or a small bird’s nest or a miniature
reel-to-reel tape recorder. As the stage is set at floor level and in a
thrust attitude, the audience is almost on top of the performers and inside
the museum. For this reviewer, one who was stationed in the Far East from
1970-1972 during the dust-up called the Vietnam War, there is one especially
heart-tugging and recurring short sequence of connected vignettes of a
family trying to stay in touch through the distances caused by Vietnam
wartime service that brought back way too many personal memories.
Written by Andrew Dawson, Trey Lyford and Geoff Sobelle.
Directed by Andrew Dawson. Design: Lucian Stecconi (set) Geoff Sobelle
(projections) Christal Weatherly (costumes) Randy “Igleu” Glickman (lights)
James Sugg (sound) Lance Hayden Kump (photography) Michelle Blair (stage
manager). Cast: Trey Lyford and Geoff Sobelle. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
all wear bowlers
Reviewed April 2 by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 1:25 - no
intermission
A stylish serving of slapstick and shtick
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for a pair of
unique theatrical experiences |
True to the title, everyone here wears a bowler hat. Even the ushers are
wearing bowlers. After all, Laurel and Hardy wore bowlers. Charlie Chaplin's
"little tramp" wore a bowler. David Shiner wore a bowler when he clambered
over the seats of the audience at Fool Moon. So the aesthetic of René
Magritte's paintings of men in bowler hats seems a reasonable basis for an
hour or so of physical comedy that blends mime with pratfall and absurdism
with a modernistic feeling of angst. Two mostly silent comics literally fall
out of their cinematic world and into the theatrical world of the audience
in the Mead Theater. They don't quite know what to make of the idea that
there are actual people watching them, nor do they know why they have
appeared on this stage. But they try to make the best of the situation.
|
|
Storyline:
+ +
+ =
a unique comedy |
This exercise in physical comedy captures your attention from the git-go. Many designers have struggled to create a blend of live action and
film for live performances. The attraction of the concept has seduced
creators ever since vaudeville. Rarely has it been done quite as well as it
is at the start of this show. However, this team of comics continue the routine
just a bit too long. Later, with the iconic gag of the piece - the
repeated regurgitation of eggs - they again violate the old magician’s adage
that you never repeat a trick when the audience can watch to see how it is
done. It isn’t that a great magician doesn't want the audience to figure out
how a trick is done. It is that he does not want the audience’s attention
distracted from the flow of the show.Trey Lyford and Geoff Sobelle make a superb comic duo, with each reacting
cleanly and clearly to the bits of the other. They build on each others'
conceits as each creates a distinct character. Think of Laurel and Hardy.
Each was unique. Oliver Hardy remained Oliver Hardy and Stan Laurel was
always Stan Laurel, even though they were Laurel&Hardy. They may have blended
into a comedy team but neither lost his identity. So Lyford and Sobelle are
different from each other even as they become Lyford&Sobelle.
Sobelle is the heavy - not just in terms of girth, but in the way he
takes command and demands obedience - even from audience members who have
the pleasure, or misfortune (depending on their predilections) to be drafted
into the events of the evening. (One female audience member will become a
feature in a memorable effect taking the junction of cinema and theater to a
higher plane). Lyford is the innocent, naive one who is - a la Stan Laurel -
just a bit mischievous as well. Together, they make the audience laugh
constantly for 85 ever so full minutes.
Created by Trey Lyford and Geoff Sobelle. Directed by Aleksandra Wolska.
Film by Michael Glass. Film composer Michael Friedman. Design: Ed Haynes
(set) Tara Webb (costumes) Randy "Igleu" Glickman (lights) James Sugg
(sound) JJ Tizou (photography) Michelle Blair (stage manager). Cast: Trey Lyford and Geoff Sobelle. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
January 2 - February 10, 2008
The Brothers Size
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 1:35 - no
intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for a polished performance of a highly polished, very
theatrical three-character play
Winner of the Ushers' Favorite Show Award
for January |
2008 starts out strong at Studio as they bring to town the production of a
new play by a new playwright that drew praise in New York in 2007. It is a
highly theatrical three-character show which is a rarity in that it deals in
dramatic fashion with a topic not often treated with such concentration. The
topic is brotherly love - not the "Philadelphia is the city of Brotherly
love" type of sweeping generalities, but the love that bonds two sons of the
same parents. These brothers care for each other in the iron clad way that
siblings do even if they don't happen to share similar interests or
ambitions. They may have taken different paths into adulthood but each is
unalterably connected to the other. As close and intimate as such a topic
can be, and as tightly structured as the play is, author Tarell Alvin
McCraney reaches for universal themes as well without loosing sight of the
familial connection between the brothers with the last name of Size.
Storyline: In a small town near the Bayou in Louisiana, hard working Ogun
Size tries to get his younger brother, Oshoosi Size to work with him at his
auto repair garage and resist the temptations that had him in the prison
from which he has just been released on probation. Oshoosi not only resents
the effort to run his life but is rife for the temptations that Elegba, whom
he knew in prison, continues to put in his path.
McCraney's play is theatrical in the way that Thornton Wilder's Our
Town is theatrical: it never lets you forget that you are watching a
play, while, at the same time, drawing you inexorably into the world it
creates. With Wilder it was a pair of ladders for a balcony scene and a
stage manager as narrator. With McCraney it is a circle of sand on the floor
defining the space, and characters voicing their own stage directions. ("Oshoosi
enters, breathing heavily" says Brian Tyree Henry at the edge of the stage
before entering and breathing heavily.) Such self-conscious theatrical
devices can be disastrous in the hands of less skilled authors, but Wilder
created a classic when he did it in his mature years. (He was 41 when the
play debuted.) McCraney hasn't matured to that level yet, but this effort
shows evidence of polishing that is surprising for a twenty-six year old at
the start of his career.
Director Tea Alagic stages McCraney's script with clarity and a sense of
direct honesty that takes full advantage of its theatrical features, filling
the hour and a half with strong visual images but without seeming to stage
anything that isn't directly related to the concept as dictated by the
author. Her sure touch makes the "work song" bucket dance sequence a virile
ballet while the image of the three member cast - each buff torso exposed
above simple blue, black or red work pants - kneeling in prayer before they
begin the play lasts just long enough to capture the imagination of the
audience.
The cast who worked for her when she first staged the play at the Public
Theatre of the New York Shakespeare Festival is still together here. Gilbert
Owuor is strong and sure as the older brother Ogun, while Brian Tyree Henry
is a bit softer and a bit looser but no less intense as the younger brother
Oshoosi. Elliot Villar is sinuous and slightly slinky as the tempter Elegba.
The names are one more way that McCraney reaches for universal messages, for
they are the names of deities from the culture of the Yoruba peoples of
western Africa. Dramaturg Danielle Mages Amato's notes in the program
attributes these traits to the names: Ogun is "the spirit of iron," Oshoosi
is "the wanderer" and Elegba "the trickster."
Written by Terell Alvin McCraney. Directed by Tea
Alagic. Design: Peter Ksander (set) Zane Philstrom (costumes) Burke Brown
(lights) Jonathan Melville Pratt (composer)
Michal Daniel
(photography) Barbara Reo (stage manager). Cast: Brian Tyree Henry, Gilbert
Owuor, Elliot Villar. Musician: Shaun Kelly. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 7 - December 30, 2007
Shining City
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 1:45 - no intermission
A therapist has more problems than his patient, a widower who is seeing his
wife's ghost
Click here to buy the script |
Long time Potomac Region veteran Ed Gero and relative newcomer from Canada
Donald Carrier provide an immersion into fine acting in an intriguing series
of scenes that are tied together more by the quality of the performances
than the thread of the story. Three of the five scenes involve Carrier and Gero while two additional scenes involve first Carrier with Lauisa Sexton
and then Carrier with Chris Genebach. Each is impressive as well. As a
result, the entire just under two hour experience is an opportunity to sit
back and watch actors sink their talented teeth into really meaty material.
The play is Irish contemporary playwright Conor McPherson's hit from Dublin,
London and Broadway which is getting its first local production here.
Director Joy Zinoman makes a heck of a show out of it, giving every aspect
of the production a sense of heft and quality.
Storyline: A former priest, who left the priesthood to
marry, is struggling to establish a practice as a therapist. He has a new
patient, a man who has begun to see the ghost of his
late wife. With each layer of the patient's story comes an accompanying
complication in the therapist's life. He feels he has to break up with the
girlfriend whose pregnancy may have been the cause of his leaving the
church. Once free of that encumbrance with the opposite sex, he has a
further complication with a prostitute of his own gender. Through it all,
however, patient and therapist develop a closeness that helps each deal with
his problems.
Conor McPherson is a great story teller. He doesn't just
dump the whole thing out and let you sort through it to your heart's content.
He takes you by the hand (or the scruff of the neck, as the case may be) and
directs your attention precisely where he wants it, forcing you to follow
his train of thought. When that train is on track, as it was in The Weir,
the result is absorbing, compelling and thoroughly satisfying. In this, his
latest work to be presented in the Potomac Region, the train is never
derailed, but there are times when he leads you off on a siding - a detour
that may be fascinating or it may be intriguing, but it isn't precisely
directed toward the final resolution.
Carrier's portrayal of the conflicted former priest is well modulated,
adding complexities and mannerisms as the script adds details. His
performance heats up as the play progresses. Gero, on the other hand, comes
on strong from his first moment. His character, after all, is the one
already driven to distraction and to seeking therapy. He lets it all out in
the first moments, stringing together McPherson's series of false starts,
incomplete sentences and more "you knows" per
page than any play we've reviewed in a long - you know - time. The strength
of Gero's performance and, for that matter, the strength of Gero's
character, draws a attention away from Carrier's therapist, leaving the
feeling - at least in the early going - that this is Gero's show. But then
comes an explosion of emotion from Sexton and an interlude of introspection
with Genebach and you realize you have been watching a play about a
therapist, not a play about a patient who has a problem with his late wife's
ghost.
The high ceiling of the Metheny Theater in Studio's four-theater complex
is put to good use with the soaring window-wall of the set providing a view
of a painted backdrop of the Dublin skyline at dusk which establishes an
atmosphere that is most effective for the ghost-story elements of the story.
The contemporary feel is established by the furnishings of the therapist's
office and re-enforced by Gil Thompson's sound design featuring guitar-led
soft pop music.
Written by Conor McPherson. Directed by Joy Zinoman.
Design: Russell Metheny (set) Helen Q. Huang (costumes) Michael Giannitti
(lights) Gil Thompson (sound) Carol Pratt (photography). Cast: Donald
Carrier, Chris Genebach, Edward Gero, Laoisa Sexton. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
September 5 - November 4, 2007
My Children! My
Africa!
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:20 - one intermission
t A Potomac
Stages Pick for a searing performance by a tremendous cast of three in a
uniquely powerful play
Winner of the Ushers' Favorite Show Award for September
and October
Click here to buy the script |
OK. Dig out your thesaurus and look up all the clichés for searing: strong,
powerful, forceful, intense, passionate, fervent, affecting. All this and
more is the experience of coming to know the three people Athol Fugard has
created in order to explore the conflict between two responses to the
stifling injustice of racial subjugation practiced in his homeland under the
Afrikaans word for apartness, "apartheid." It isn't a propaganda piece so
much as it is a balanced presentation of the hopes, dreams, fears and
frustrations of two people subject to the same injustice but clinging to two
very different opinions as to what to do about it. Add the yeast of a young
friendship across racial lines to provide wider perspective and a sounding
board for the interchange of passionately held ideas. Then trust that
material to three fabulous actors under a thoughtful and skilled director.
The result is searing in the finest meaning of the word.
Storyline: As resistance to apartheid in South Africa begins to escalate
in the 1980s, a teacher in a school for Bantu children sees in one of his students the promise of a better future through talent,
education and the power of words. However, that student, a well spoken young
man with the skill of a debater, sees only one way toward an acceptable
future for his people: resistance to the forced separation of the races that
has been the law in his country for thirty years. When a debate contest pits
that Bantu student against a white student from a neighboring high school,
an equally intelligent young woman, a friendship begins.
History plays
have a way of seeming to offer a glimpse of an important moment in the past
through a safe lens of time - we can look back and marvel at the challenges
of the moment and the responses of individuals while feeling a bit safe and
secure on our perch in the future. What, then of a play written not about an
historical event long past but written at the time of the event with all the
immediacy and uncertainty that great moments in history share? Athol Fugard,
a white Afrikaaner, stared history in the face in real time. He wrote
this explication of the conflict between two courses of action at the moment
that his society was facing that choice. It could have been a diatribe in
favor of one or the other. Instead, it is a painfully emotional capturing of
the human costs of each and it is delivered with a profound respect for both
views.
James Brown-Orleans combines the passion of a teacher for his student's
future with his deep commitment to the power of words, of precise and
careful communication, and his appreciation of his continent's heritage.
Viewing the two students through his eyes feels like a privilege. Veronica
del Cerro is charming, chipper and ultimately devastating as the white
student whose difficulty comprehending the scope and impact of the forces of
society and history which buffet her country helps the audience feel the
intensity of those forces. The centerpiece of the play, however, and also
the focal point of the cast is Yaegel T. Welch as the young man in whom his
teacher sees the promise of the future. As individuals, each is superb. As
an ensemble, they are spectacular.
Special note should be made of the impact of the dialect on the
experience of this play. It will come as a surprise to many after hearing
this play that none of the three members of the cast come from South Africa.
Look at their educational listings: University of Maryland, Virginia Tech
and Morehouse College/Brandeis University. Dialect coach BettyAnn Leeseberg-Lange
may be responsible for the fact that all three speak in a distinctive and
distinguishable manner, each just foreign enough to local ears to demand
of the audience careful listening but not impenetrable enough to constitute
a bar to understanding. It is a fine line which is straddled completely and
consistently here which serves the play beautifully.
Written by Athol Fugard. Directed by Serge Seiden. Design: Debra Booth
(set) Reggie Ray (costumes) Harold F. Burgess II (lights) Neil McFadden
(sound) Carol Pratt (photography) Jenna Henderson (stage manager). Cast:
James Brown-Orleans, Veronica del Cerro, Yaegel T. Welch.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 13 - July 29, 2007
Souvenir
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 1:55 - one intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for an unforgettable
evening with a vocalist of no talent but a healthy sense of self worth
Winner of the Ushers'
Favorite Show Award for July
Click here to buy the script
Click here to buy the CD |
We have been fortunate to witness a number of priceless, unforgettable
individual performances in our town thus far in the new century. Some have
been delivered by Nancy Robinette (Frozen
here at Studio,
The Rivals at the Shakespeare Theatre Company). Another was J. Fred
Shiffman's stint in
Cabaret at Arena Stage. Now, add to the list one evening in the
hands of both that will remain vivid in your memory for a long, long
time. The memory will be a pleasant one because the evening is just so much
fun. Don't let anyone tell you this is a musical, however. There are songs
and there is the very pleasant piano playing of Shiffman, but there isn't
much music in the singing - there isn't supposed to be. For this is the
story of a recitalist with zero musical ability - nada, zip, zilch! Oh, but
the singer's unshakable faith in her own performances is so strong that she
is oblivious to any sign of criticism or rejection. When, at the end, she
actually shows a moment of doubt, it is a fleeting one and her recovery,
with the aid of her long time accompanist, is total. Total is the proper
word here for the evening itself is a total delight.
Storyline: From 1912 to 1944, Florence Foster Jenkins, who had no singing
ability whatever (no control of pitch, no sense of rhythm) gave vocal
recitals which, in the late thirties became social events in New York,
culminating at age 76 in a famous recital at Carnegie Hall which was sold
out weeks in advance.
Playwright Stephen Temperley found just the right approach to tell this
amazing story. He tells it through the memories of Jenkins' long-time
accompanist, a man with the unlikely name of Cosme McMoon. By beginning at
their first meeting and following through rehearsals and recitals, he allows
us to see McMoon's reactions to the incredible lack of talent he is
witnessing first hand. By having McMoon act as storyteller, he lets us
experience the development of affection and respect that forms the basis for
their long-time association. It isn't, of course, that McMoon begins to
think "Madame Flo" really can sing. It is that he comes to admire her
indomitable spirit and positive approach to life. We, like McMoon, come to
genuinely like this batty lady even as we are convulsed with laughter at her
expense. (Just to prove to you that we are not making this up, we've
included a link to order the CD of Florence Foster Jenkins' recordings in a
package aptly titled "The Glory (????) of the Human Voice.")
What might have turned into a guilty pleasure, a voyeuristic exercise in
watching someone make a total fool of herself, is converted into an
affectionate and ultimately touching experience through the talents of
Robinette. She makes no pretense to musical ability. (Indeed,
for the final
moment of the play when we are offered a glimpse into Jenkins' own view of
her performance, it is a recording of a real vocalist with a beautiful voice.) Robinette uses her considerable ability to
draw the affection of an audience and she makes Jenkins not so much an
object of ridicule as a person of admirable character. Shiffman's skill is
quite a match for hers and the chemistry between the two performers is a
pleasure to behold.
All the design elements are notable in this production. There is a lovely
setting that doubles as rehearsal room and recital hall, a succession of
delightfully ditsy costumes for Robinette/Jenkins and a lighting design that
smoothly signals the differences between the incredible public events, the
back-stage rehearsal time and the digressions into McMoon's own memory. What
is more, sound designer Gil Thompson adds the sounds of the audience
reactions to Jenkins' excesses so subtly that it feels as if you are, in
fact, in Carnegie Hall trying with all your might to contain yourself while
others are bursting out in laughter. Thompson approaches the line between
recreation of the event the play is about - the concert at Carnegie Hall - and the sweetening of
audience reactions to the performance of this play itself. I can't say whether
he crosses that line because I was laughing too hard to tell.
Written by Stephen Temperley. Directed by Serge Seiden. Vocal consultant:
Micaele Sparacino. Design: Luciana Stecconi (set) Reggie Ray (costumes) John
Burkland (lights) Gil Thompson (sound) Jess W. Speaker III (stage manager).
Cast: Nancy Robinette, J. Fred Shiffman.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
May 16 - July 22, 2007
Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern Are Dead
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:20 - one intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for an enormously entertaining, intellectually challenging
comedy
Click here to buy the script |
Don't ever let anyone say that intellectual material need be dry or dull!
Theatergoers know that this is not only not true, it is the opposite of
truth. But sometimes you need an example as you argue with those who
think "culture" is something to be suffered through. Here's ammunition for
your fight. True, every line of Tom Stoppard's rumination
on existence is intellectually charged, carefully crafted and freighted with
import both surface and subliminal. But it is equally true that every one of
those lines is interesting and thought provoking and most of them are
also superbly funny. What this play isn't is dull. What it is, is
entertaining. The title pair are Raymond Bokhour, who brings just a hint of
the "Mr. Celophane" persona from his stint in the Broadway revival of
Chicago to the role of the equally semi-substantial Rosencrantz (or is
that Guildenstern?) and Liam Craig, with his slightly brittle, constantly
questioning facile mind as Guildenstern (or is that Rosencrantz?). They are
each and both fun to watch and intriguing to ponder. That is precisely what
you want from the pair playing those roles in Stoppard's extended
examination of existentialism.
Storyline: Two minor players in the drama of Hamlet spend most of their
time offstage wondering just what all the fuss is about. They while away the
time with word games and coin tossing but the dark prince and the other
characters in Shakespeare's play keep shaking up their world in ways that,
while completely consistent with what Shakespeare wrote, make little sense
to them with their restricted view of that reality.
Stoppard was a
brash twenty-something when his first effort to capture the thoughts of
these two minor characters in a major Shakespeare psycho-drama saw the light
of day in a workshop for promising new playwrights. He was not yet thirty
when the full length version was put up at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival,
which gave it the exposure that resulted in a production at Sir Laurence
Olivier's Old Vic, and his career was under way. That career has, to date, included such marvels as Indian Ink and The Invention of Love
which have been produced here at Studio, the trilogy Coast of Utopia
(which premiered as a package on Broadway this
year as is now one of the nominees for the Tony Award for Best Play, and
films such as Shakespeare in Love. (We won't get involved in the
controversy over rumors that he also wrote the screenplay for Star Wars:
Episode III.)
"It was merely competent" says "The Player" played at
a level so far above merely competent as to make the comment laughable, even
if it weren't so in context in Stoppard's script. This player is none other
than Floyd King, who hasn't stooped to the level of mere competence in many a
year. With his tattered smoking jacket, his pencil thin moustache and a
sense of unmatchable insouciance, he lifts the production with each
entrance. His "troupe" is a marvelously choreographed moving entity with
only one of the members actually establishing a personality of his own:
Miles Butler as the ever changeable prize "Alfredo." Major players from the
world of Shakespeare's play who pass through this off-stage are more
distinctly drawn by Dan Mannning (the usurping King Claudius) Maura McGinn
(his wife Gertrude) and most specifically Marshall Elliot as a dashing
Prince Hamlet himself.
Daniel Conway's slate-grey forced perspective
set makes Elsinore's ramparts resemble a condo - which fits with Alex
Jaeger's slightly British twentieth century costuming that highlights the
Laurel and Hardiness of the title pair with bowler hats and trench coats.
The performance is in the Mead where the front of the playing surface is the
floor of the audience, allowing the boundary between audience and
performance to be blurred at times and broken at others. When Bokhour's Guildenstern walks up the aisle and
pronounces the view from the audience to be particularly unimpressive, he's
wrong. He just didn't stay long enough to discover the joys of a truly
entertaining, intellectually satisfying production.
Written by Tom Stoppard. Directed by Kirk
Jackson. Design: Daniel Conway (set) Alex Jaeger (costumes) Michael Philippi
(lights) Neil McFadden (sound) Scott Suchman (photography) John Keith Hall
(stage manager). Cast: McKenzie Bowling, Raymond Bokhour, Miles Butler,
Marshall Elliot, Liam Craig, Theo Hadjimichael, Dan Istrate, Floyd
King, Tim Lueke, Dan Manning, Maura McGinn, Kevin Sockwell, Nick Stevens. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
March 14 - April 29, 2007
The Pillowman
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:35 - one intermission
A harrowing descent into simultaneous horror and humor
Click here to buy the script |
There are so many plot twists and surprises in Martin McDonagh's dark and
troubling horror story, spiced with even darker humor, that it is difficult to
discuss the play at any depth without giving away too much. There are
special thrills of discovery to be had that would be diminished by premature
revelation. Still, since readers presumably came to this page in part to
find out just what it is that Studio Theatre is offering for $39 to
$55 a seat, we need to assure those who would seek this combination of the
chills of horror stories, the shudder of cautionary tales of police
brutality in a dictatorship, and the nervous release of tension through
laughter, that this production delivers every shiver and not a few nervous
titters in just about the most polished presentation imaginable. Joy Zinoman
directs a superb cast - at least the four leads are superb. The script
doesn't really give much for the other four cast members to do but be on
display in the stories within the play. Ah, but the four leads - they are
marvelous.
Storyline: In a totalitarian police state, a young man who writes horror
stories is taken into custody and interrogated by policemen who seem to be
investigating cases of crimes that resemble his stories. Has he been acting
his own stories out? Has someone else been doing it? Complicating things for
the young man is his fear that they may have also arrested his brother, a
slightly retarded young man who may or may not have something to do with the
case(s).
The dramaturg's program notes tell us that Martin McDonagh wrote these
stories as just that - stories. They were not conceived as part of a play.
The play came later. Its structure is essentially that of a revue with
stories instead of sketches and songs. Like many great revues of the past,
there is an over-arching theme tying them together in a story of its own. In
most revue's however, it is the songs, sketches and scenes that are the
strength. Here, it is that central story that is the strength. The ten
stories which are either played out, read or alluded to during the evening
are of less consequence than the fate of the writer and his brother at the
hands of a good cop/bad cop team. Indeed, the few stories that are played
out behind the main set are unnecessary distractions. They have a Stephen King-ish fascination all their own, but they don't
add a great deal more to the central story than those stories which are read
or described within the confines of the police station. It's the story in the
station that really matters.
Tom Story plays the writer with a fine feel for both the dread his
character experiences under interrogation and the humor he tries to use to
manage his dire situation. Aaron Muñoz is touching and often refreshing as
the brother who relies on him for, well, everything. The two of them bond
deliciously. They are but one of two really impressive teams. Denis Arndt
and Hugh Nees are every bit as effective as the cops. Arndt's "good" cop
uses a peculiarly hard-boiled brand of humor as an interrogation technique.
Nees' "bad" cop is much deeper a character than it seems at first, and his
big speech in the second act is a joy to watch for those who have enjoyed
his growth as an actor in recent years. As if this were some kind of
demented challenge dance, Arndt then has an equally impressive big speech in
act two. Just who tops whom is debatable.
Debra Booth's main set is the interior of the police station and it is an
imposing, troubling presence with its resonance reinforced by Gil Thompson's
sound effect of resounding echoes that accompanies each slamming of the
single steel door that may be the opening to freedom or perhaps the pathway
to execution. The music by Michael Gallant (not to be confused with the
fictional character on ER) is as distinctive as was the music he
composed for Studio's Far
Away. Indeed, it seems to transition from an almost Disney movie
score mode into something more like a Maurice Jarre suspense soundtrack.
Written by Martin McDonagh. Directed by Joy Zinoman. Design: Debra Booth
(set) Helen Huang (costumes) Michael Giannitti (lights) Gil Thompson (sound)
Michael Gallant (music) Danielle Mages Amato (dramaturg) Carol Pratt
(photography) Serge Seiden (stage manager). Cast: Denis Arndt, Zachary Fadler, Meghan Fay, Julie Garner, Aaron Muñoz, Hugh Nees, Tom Story, Aaron
Tone. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
February 7 - March 11, 2007
The Passion of the
Crawford
Reviewed by
William Bryan |
Running time 1:50 - no intermission
A glib examination of honesty with three bright performances |
Very good and very
bizarre both equally describe this one hour of lip syncing madness from the
mind of John Epperson and the life of Joan Crawford. If you loved Joan
Crawford then this is the show for you, for Lypsinka (aka John Epperson)
fully embodies the role and persona of the bigger than life star. Performed
in traditional Lypsinka style, the show is a series of recordings of Joan -
giving interviews, reading a poem, or other moments - clipped and spliced
together. Lypsinka impersonates the famous actress far beyond what is
normally thought of as lip syncing, fully becoming her (his?) character.
Joan was a proud woman, and a strange one, as shown by Faye Dunaway so
powerfully in the movie classic Mommie Dearest, and this comes
through with a climatic ending to a surreal trip through the life of this
famous star. Staged in the Milton Theater with its arc of seats, the
staging, lighting, effects and applause take the audience back in time to
relive moments of a bygone era.
Storyline: Lypsinka
(also known as John Epperson) returns in this one hour look at the powerful
life of Joan Crawford.
True to form, Lypsinka,
now in her 25th year of performances, has fully developed the
presence of the fabled Crawford. To appreciate this achievement, it must be
remembered that Joan started as a dancer, became famous in silent pictures,
survived into talkies and went on to surpass Betty Davis as the most famous
starlet of her time. Taking on this role, as with the role of any powerful
figure, can set up expectations that run higher than ability can support.
Fortunately this is not the case with The Passion of the Crawford. Add in the complexity that Lypsinka herself is a creation, played by a man,
and the achievement of presence that Epperson exudes is truly phenomenal.
Still, this is a trying
show. Joan Crawford died in 1977. Many of the younger crowd in the audience
seemed to be out of touch with the performance they were seeing. One remark
after it was over summed up the situation well, “If I knew anything about
Joan Crawford I probably would have liked that much more.” Epperson as
Lypsinka as Joan does well, but the premise of the show - little snippets of
her life that could be culled from various recordings - is not meant for the
uninformed or non-Joan Crawford fan. Choices of cuts from interview to
flashback throughout the show also throw off any learning that might occur/
They drag the viewer along for the ride, often leaving the departure and the
destination as unknown places. It would be interesting to see a full
biographical play set around Joan’s life with Lypsinka in the role, if only
to fully appreciate the depth of understanding John Epperson has for his
mark.
Steve Cuiffo plays the
interviewer and announcer throughout the show. Just like Epperson, he
"merely" lip syncs to the prerecorded voice. But he is just as engaging and
convincing as is she/he. The interviewer’s obvious infatuation with Crawford
and the effect of her presence on him come across throughout the show. Thank
goodness for the laughs this provides to what could otherwise have felt like
an hour in the twilight zone for those who no longer have the interest or
patience to sit through an interview that is three decades old. Finally, the
costume work of Ramona Pence is impeccable, perfectly capturing the glamour
that was the Queen of Hollywood.
Created by John
Epperson. Directed by Kevin Maloney. Design: Luciana Steccona (set),
Catherine Eliot (lights), Gil Thompson (sound) Ramona Pence (costumes),
Cassandra Domser (stage manager). Cast: John Epperson, Steve Cuiffo.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
January 3 - February 11, 2007
This Is How It
Goes |
Running time 1:50 - no
intermission
A glib examination of honesty with three bright performances
Click here to buy the script |
After the success of The Shape of Things
in 2002 and Fat Pig in 2006, Studio returns to the
work of Neil LaBute for a play about an interracial love triangle. LaBute is
well known for facile dialogue and intriguing plotting, and for boldly breaking
taboos. Here he proves that two out of three ain't too bad. The piece
abounds with facility with three characters each given a unique voice, and
exchanges that exude wit, humor and/or emotion as the situation demands. It
also is plotted in such an interesting way that it holds your attention
throughout its nearly two hour run as you constantly try to figure out just
where this thing might be going. Its in that "boldly go where no man has
gone before" tradition of LaBute's taboo tackling that the piece falters. At
first he seems to be aiming his sights on the rules against telling untruths
- but that rule doesn't have any strength to it at all, at least not since
George Washington's "I cannot tell a lie." So how can breaking the rule be
shocking or even out of the ordinary? Later on in the play, he throws in
hate speech. Is this the taboo he's trying to break? If so, it comes across
feeling as if the issue is an afterthought thrown in because
the morning papers are reporting that Mel Gibson has gone off the deep end about Jews or
YouTube has video of Michael Richards' diatribe about African-Americans. If
that is it, it is too little, too late.
Storyline: An "unreliable narrator" relates the tale of his return to the
town where he attended high school, and his developing re-involvement in the
lives of two of his classmates who advanced from bi-racial high school
sweethearts to married parents. In telling the tale, he takes various
excursions and digressions, introducing complications, retracting
inconvenient details and even revising events after they have been played
out before our eyes.
LaBute's trademark glib sense
of humor serves him and his audience well, especially in the early portions
of the play. As Eric Feldman takes the stage to narrate/participate in his
version of events, he addresses the audience directly, telling us right up
front that he may stretch or alter the truth from time to time and that he
only has access to one side of a multi-sided situation. Feldman is an
extremely attractive presence, which is a good thing since he soon has to
share the stage with a very attractive couple.
Anne Bowles, who was so gorgeous as the girl friend
with the slender sexy body who couldn't believe she was being dumped in
favor of a super-sized rival in LaBute's Fat Pig, again brightens the
stage while struggling with some of LaBute's lines that impose worn out
"Valley Girl" mannerisms on this mid-western young wife and mother. (He has
fun with over-use of "you know" just one or two times too often). Benton
Greene makes a notable Potomac Region debut as her husband, the former high
school jock now a successful businessman, who is described as "rich and black
and different." All three hold the stage in the intimate Mead Theater with
assurance. There is a fourth member of the cast who goes uncredited (the
same thing happened last year at this same theater when Shawn Helm went uncredited as the guard in
Frozen just because it was a part with no lines. If Synetic Theater
didn't credit parts with no words, sometimes there'd be no credits at all!) This time it is a woman
who makes multiple passes across the stage as a waitress ignoring the party
who want to order their meal. She may not contribute a word but she could
well kill the scene if she didn't do her part with assurance. She deserves
credit.
Director Paul Mullins, who handled Fat Pig with
such a sure hand, returns to Studio and to the work of LaBute, and again
makes the most of the material. It isn't his fault that the text itself
hasn't got the impact of the earlier effort. He gives it every chance to
succeed and his casting choices and selection of a design team certainly
gave him all the tools he needed. The elegantly bare set is brought to life
with some marvelous projections. The lighting manages to create different
feelings for different environments (warmth for a backyard barbecue,
utilitarian brightness for an indoor mall) while not bleeding over to wash
out the projections. The costumes are spot on for middle-America,
upper-middle-class chic, and there is a subtle but somewhat
overused effect in the sound design when Feldman switches from being the
narrator to being a character in scenes with the rest of the cast - the
sound of the noises in the mall or the birds chirping in the trees either
begins or ends with a swoosh as if it were on a tape starting or stopping, as
the case may be.
Written by Neil LaBute. Directed by Paul Mullins. Design:
Debra Booth (set) Kate Turner-Walker (costumes) Michael Chybowski (lights)
Neil McFadden (sound) Scott Suchman (photography) Rebecca Berlin (stage
manager). Cast: Anne Bowles, Eric Feldman, Benton Greene.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 15 - December 31, 2006
The Long Christmas Ride Home
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 1:35 - no
intermission
t A Potomac
Stages Pick for a unique
theatrical experience
v
Sexual themes treated frankly
Click here to buy the script |
Paula Vogel uses live actors, puppetry, projections and Japanese shamisen
music in
her story of a family whose ride to grandmother's house
for Christmas isn't a particular joy, but whose ride home is an unmitigated
disaster. Director Serge Seiden assembles all those elements with a deft
touch that creates a spell from the first moment that musician Sumie Kaneko
enters in unhurried formality, makes eye contact with the audience, bows and
takes her place on a mat at the side of the stage. As each player enters, he
or she too acknowledges that this is a play, a theatrical event. They take a
deep breath, let it out and begin. Ah, but that breath is more than just a
gesture. It is a part of the story, a plot point and the key to the final
image of the play. That symmetry, connecting first to last and tying
elements together, is the essence of the show which uses classical Japanese
theatrical traditions of bunruku and noh to tell a distinctly modern
American story, a story drawn from both the family history of the author and
the plays of Thornton Wilder. (Even the title is a bit of homage to Wilder
whose 1931 short play The Long Christmas Party viewed the impact of
holiday events on family ties.)
Storyline: A flare-up among the adults in the front seat of the family
car marks the lives of the children in the backseat on one cold ride to visit to
their grandparents' house at Christmas. The event and its ramifications are
viewed by the adults those children grew up to be, as one - the son who died
of AIDS - returns to earth to re-visit his earthly past and his family - and
to take one more breath of life.
Author
Paula Vogel may well draw from many sources for this short but intense
piece, but it bears a striking similarity to more than just Thornton Wilder
and Noh and Bunruku. It bears a similarity to her own best known piece, her
Pulitzer Prize winning How I Learned to Drive. That play too begins
with such a wholesome, positive feel, uses humor and the accumulation of
tiny details to bring its characters to life, and only then reveals its
troubling aspects after the audience has come to care about each of the
people in the story. Here the theatricality of the presentation style adds
to the richness. That theatricality could well overwhelm the slender thread
of the story, however, were it not for Seiden's success at keeping the
elements in balance.
Kevin Bergen is captivating as the son whose story this really is. Both
Kate Debelack and Tonya Beckman Ross imbue the sisters with
individuality. The puppets of Aaron Cromie are manipulated by a
team of black clad puppeteers along with Bergen, Debelack and Ross,
each doing the principal handling of the puppet of their character in
childhood.
The
grownups, mother Laura Giannarelli and father Paul L. Nolan, are
exceptionally strong even though neither has a puppet-self which would
amplify their traits. Bobby Smith, however, has the problem that he must
double up on roles (he plays a preacher in the "Rockville Universalist Unitarian
Church" who shares his slides of Japanese woodblock art with his
congregation, as well as a dancer in the gay world of San Francisco). He
tries a bit too hard to draw distinctions between the characters.
Daniel Conway has provided a great set for the space in the new Methany
Theatre. Or is it that the new Methany Theater is a great space for this
set? There's a fine blend between the two with the spare, geometric ambiance
of the theater and the even sparer assembly of geometric shapes that Conway
places on the stage - an oval platform before a grid with paper panels under
a roofline reminiscent of a Japanese woodcut of a winter shelter. Behind it
all, a ramp slopes down from either side, completing the geometric balance
of simple, interlocking spaces.
Written by Paula Vogel. Directed by Serge Seiden. Original music composed
and performed by Sumie Kaneko. Choreographed by Dana Tai Soon Burgess.
Design: Daniel Conway (set) Devon Painter (costumes) Aaron Cromie (puppets)
Michael Giannitti (lights) Erik Trester (sound)
Carol Pratt
(photography) David Elias (stage manager). Cast: Kevin Bergen, Kate Debelack,
Laura Giannarelli, Paul L. Nolan, Tonya Beckman Ross, Bobby Smith; and
puppeteers Emmy Bean, Courtney Bell, Lucas Maloney, Betsy Rosen, Ben Russo
and Michael C. Wilson.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
September 6 - October 29, 2006
Red Light Winter |
Running time 2:40 - one intermission
A strong performance in the lead role of a disturbing play
v
Includes nudity and violent and sexual activity
Click here to buy the script |
Adam Rapp's tragic drama was nominated for both the Obie
award for Off-Broadway play and the Pulitzer Prize for Drama, so it should
not be surprising that there are both effective scenes and individual lines
of dialogue so highly polished you almost want a pause button so you can
stop and contemplate a thought here or a well turned phrase there. Without
such a button, however, the performance moves right along and one has to try
to keep up. Its a struggle, for the plot is convoluted and often contrived
and the progress of the relationship between the characters is often
inconsistent or unbelievable. Joy Zinoman gives the play every opportunity
to succeed with a spirited, in-your-face production that is alternately
fascinating and repulsive - just as it is supposed to be. She gives an
impressive new actor, Jason Fleitz, his first exposure here after having
been the understudy for the lead in the play's world premiere and a standby
in the play's New York production.
Storyline: An introverted would-be playwright and an
extroverted publisher who were best buddies in college share a hostel room
in Amsterdam during a European vacation. The publisher buys the services of
a prostitute for his introverted friend, perhaps in part to make amends for
having taken his girlfriend from him years ago. The introvert falls for the
prostitute but she falls for his friend. A year later the prostitute shows
up in the playwright's apartment in New York looking for his friend. The
strange triangle gets even stranger when a strain of HIV is added to the mix.
Fleitz gives an impressive
performance as the introvert. It is a subtle mixture of mannerisms and
movements, but the thing that makes the performance as compelling as it is is
his ability to establish eye contact with his fellow actors and to focus his
attention on their words in between his own lines. Regina Aquino has some
fine moments as the trans-Atlantic prostitute. Her part is so broad in
scope but so shallow in development that it sort of
defeats her efforts to bring it to life. William Peden is suitably
detestable as the extrovert, who, by his own admission, is "not a nice
person." Just why the introvert would be traveling with such a self-centered
supposed "friend" who not only has done in wrong in the past but continues
to belittle him in the present is never quite clear. You won't like him, but
your not supposed to.
Kater Turner-Walker's costumes, her
red dress for Aquino, stretched-out undershirt and battered jeans for Fleitz
and more costly but still "with it" youth attire for Peden are spot-on for
each of the three characters. Debra Booth's attractive set violates a key
rule of a thrust stage such as Studio has in the Mead. With the audience on
three sides, the sightlines are obscured for those on the extreme house
left. They can't see the window through which Aquino takes her final,
plot-important action. Readers may want to spend the extra five to nine
dollars that seats in the center section and orchestra cost for this show.
A note about notes: Studio Theater
has a tradition of providing helpful information in the programs which are
passed out to the audience members as they arrive. These programs have not
been limited to credits and bio blurbs on cast and creative team members.
Often, when the play calls for it, the programs provide information on the
period in which the play is set, the references which might otherwise be
obscure and even some appreciative background on the playwright. It would be
good if they did more of this. In this program, for the first play of the
new season, the appreciative backgrounder on the playwright, while a bit
like a press release, is fairly informative as to Mr. Rapp's
career to date and the dramaturg's notes seem more an evaluation of the play
than an aide to getting the most out of the experience. There's no information on Amsterdam and its drug
policies and red light district nor of Manhattan's East Village for those
less familiar with the milieu of the play. Perhaps the rest
of the programs for the season will revert to the more informative, helpful
format of years past.
Written by Adam Rapp. Directed by
Joy Zinoman. Design: Debra Booth (set) Kate Turner-Walker (costumes) Jeavon
Greenwood (properties) Michael Giannitti (lights) Neil McFadden (sound) Keri Schultz (stage manager). Cast: Regina Aquino, Jason Fleitz, William
Peden.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
May 17 - July 23, 2006
Caroline, or
Change |
Reviewed May 21
Running time 2:30 - one intermission
Potomac Region premiere of the 2004 musical
Click here to buy the CD |
Symbolism can add depth and texture to a rich story, or it can overwhelm a
simple tale. Here, the story and the morals it offers are dealt a body blow
by symbols which, depending on how one interprets the tale, highlight its
shallowness or trivialize its depth. So simple on its surface, but so
obviously intended to be the bearer of important comments on human
relations, the plot is too flimsy to support singing washing machines or
crooning busses. Singing inanimate objects are no stranger to the musical
stage - vocalizing teapots work for Beauty and the Beast where charm
and razzmatazz are required to keep the attention of the little ones. Here,
however, the intended audience is mature and intellectually discriminating,
so the writing of songs for the washing machine, the dryer and the bus
belittle a gentle piece of nostalgia. Studio's new production is nearly as
solid and impressive as was the one that ran for a four month run on
Broadway, but its cast isn't quite as strong as was the original.
Storyline: The black housekeeper in a white
Louisiana home in 1963 has troubles of her own with one son away in Vietnam,
a rebellious teenage daughter and two younger boys who are not above a bit
of mischief. She spends most of her day not at home with her family, but in
the basement of her employer washing their clothes, listening to the popular
rhythm and blues on the radio and enjoying the one cigarette she allows
herself each day. Things aren't without problems for the family of the house
either. The father has recently been widowed and has remarried but he's
still hurt and withdrawn. The in-laws are squabbling, his son isn't taking
to his new stepmother and she, fresh from northern climes, wants the maid to
call her by her first name. Her approach to discipline for the son is to
tell Caroline she can keep whatever change she finds in the boy's pockets in
the wash.
In its debut production in New York the
reaction was split. There were raves from some reviewers and many Tony
nominations driven by initial buzz (it opened just prior to the Tony Award
eligibility cut off). There were also some dissenters (including Potomac
Stages - click
here to read our review of the Broadway production, but be aware that
the opinion found there is practically identical to the one found here).
Ultimately, it was a financial loss after a short run of just 136
performances. Expectations had been sky high for the first musical by Tony
Kushner with music by Jeanine Tesori, fresh from her success with
Thoroughly Modern Millie. And, devotees of
Angels in America knew just how skillfully Kushner can weave multiple
storylines together. There certainly are enough storylines here to keep him
hopping, with two families full of humanly imperfect people. So who needed
the washing machine to break into song? But ultimately it wasn't just
the potential silliness of some of the flights of fancy wrapped as symbols,
it was the shallowness of some of the characterizations. Despite the
fact that they represent people caught up in a complex time of social
upheaval, as written the people in this house are as one dimensional as the
singing machines.
On Broadway some of that shallowness was disguised by
a searing performance in the role of Caroline that is not really matched
here at Studio. Julia Nixon starts off strong with a great sense of
soul-drained weariness as the maid with a world of problems of her own. Her
sense of fatigue and lost hope is palpable and carries the performance all
the way to the final aria when, inexplicably, she seems to sing the music
marvelously but miss the drama that the show has been building to for over
two hours. Rockville sixth grader Max Talisman makes his professional debut
as the young man who can never seem to remember to remove the change from
his pockets. He sings clearly and is un-self-conscious on stage. There are
fine performances from Trisha Jeffrey as Caroline's teenage daughter, Bobby
Smith as the clarinet playing father of the house and most particularly from
Elmore James whose deep blues bass fills the Methany Theatre with glorious
sound without the aid of artificial amplification.
That decision to go without amplification is to be
applauded and it is a joy to hear much of the nearly-sung-through score
delivered acoustically. (As "The Moon" Allison Blackwell is mic'd but it is
clearly for the purpose of adding reverberation to give the moon an ethereal
sound, not to amplify her hall-filling voice.) An off stage orchestra
handles the effective orchestrations, reduced significantly from the
original to simply six including two keyboards. The cello of Aaron Rider is
called upon to provide the richness that four string players brought to
Broadway. The placement of the players off stage, and whatever baffles have
been installed in their space, works very well to strike the balance needed
between instruments and vocalists. What is more, without the sound coming
from speakers you can actually follow a
voice from one side of the stage to the other - something that seems to
always be missing in musicals on the "Great White Way" these days.
Book and lyrics by Tony Kushner. Music by Jeanine
Tesori. Directed by Greg Ganakas. Music direction by Howard Breitbart.
Design: Debra Booth (set) Alex
Jaeger (costumes) Kirk Bookman (lights) Neil McFadden (sound) Scott Suchman
(photography) Karen Storms (stage manager). Cast: Allison Blackwell, Zachary
Carson Blumenstein, Kearstin Piper Brown, Ilona Dulaski, Elmore James,
Trisha Jeffrey, Kameron Lamar, Otts Laupus, Julie Nixon, Omoro Omoighe,
Monique Paulwell, Kelly J. Rucker, Jim Scopeletis, Bobby Smith, Tia Speros,
Max Talisman. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
March 8 - April 15, 2006
The Prime of Miss
Jean Brodie |
Reviewed March 12
Running time 2:25 - one intermission
A strong enactment of the famous novel
v
Includes brief nudity
Click here to buy the novel
Click here to buy the script |
Sarah Marshall nails the most important single scene in this strong drama,
earning her the right to stand beside Joe Caldwell who won a Tony in the
role in 1968 and Maggie Smith who won an Oscar for the 1970 movie. The trite
rejoinder "You can't fire me - I quit" has tempted many who have been called
on the carpet by their employer. Not Miss Brodie in the searing portrait
Marshall creates. No, her response to the criticism of the headmistress of
the school where she teaches impressionable young women is: "You can't fire
me - and if you try, I'll sue the pants off of you!" There are moments in
the rest of the show when Marshall's portrayal of the Scottish schoolmarm
isn't rock solid. She may even be a bit too impish for the part. But when
she gets to this, a crucial moment, she hits it with a strength that is to
be savored. Unfortunately, from where this reviewer was seated, her other
big scene was not visible because director Joy Zinoman inexplicably blocked
the moment with a student standing in front of Marshall's Brodie, obscuring
the view for a major segment of the audience.
Storyline: In the early 1930s a Scottish school
teacher dedicated to her students tries to mold them in her own concept of
enlightened womanhood. Her version of art, truth and beauty is not
universally accepted, however, and her dalliance with the school's art and
music teachers get her into trouble. Her refusal to compromise her values
deepen the trouble.
Everyone who ever attended school has a memory of one
particular teacher who had more impact on him or her than all the others.
This is the essence of the relationship of Marshall's Miss Jean Brodie to
the students in her charge. She's that special, one-of-a-kind teacher. She's
a free thinker who values curiosity, individuality and intellectual
discipline. In the early 1930s, long before the revelations of the excesses
of fascism, she is enamored with the rule of Italy's Benito Mussolini. She
takes sides in the Spanish civil war, and can't hold her tongue when it
comes to opinions of the Roman Catholic Church. Her era was one of
transition from a stilted past to what today would be called more liberated.
In her day, women who pursued a career in teaching had to sacrifice the
right to marriage - if they did marry, they were required by law to resign.
The stress between professional and personal satisfaction as a teacher and
the temptation to form close adult relationships with men their own age is
at the crux of the play.
Zinoman's production is elegant in its
set, costumes, lighting and sound. Erik Trester provides projections which turn the
set into a number of different locales through a design that is admirable
for its restraint. Rarely does he succumb to the temptation to use an
unnecessary projection just because the equipment is available. Actor
Richard Stirling, who plays the music teacher, is uncredited as musical
director for the production, but he is said to have worked closely with
Zinoman to select just the right pieces in what turns out to be a highly
musical show with the student's music lessons and singing in church setting
a lovely tone. Both Stirling and David Adkins, as the school's art teacher,
provide a touch of male presence in an otherwise powerfully feminine cast.
Catherine Flye is sharp as the easy-to-despise headmistress and Sarah Grace
Wilson, Elizabeth Chomko and the other students create distinct individuals.
As strong as the script is, and as impressive as is
the staging, there are moments in the play that make you wonder just what
Zinoman is doing. With a play requiring the cast to speak in a brogue
foreign to the ears of the local audience, she chooses to complicate the
task of those listening intently by introducing a strange reverberation in
the sound system for a key scene. She blocks a number of scenes in such a
way that significant portions of the audience can't see key events. Two portraits play an important
part in the drama. From the right side of the house, both portraits are
visible to the audience. From the left side, however, neither portrait can
be seen. One director might chose to let the audience see the portraits and
another might chose to keep them hidden. It is hard to understand, however,
just why half of the audience should see them and half not.
Written by Jay Presson Allen based on the novel by
Muriel Spark. Directed by Joy Zinoman. Design: Daniel Conway (set) Alex
Jaeger (costumes) Erik Trester (projections) Gil Thompson (sound) Elizabeth
van den Berg (dialect coach) Scott Suchman (photography) Susie Pamudji (stage manager). Cast: David
Adkins, Fiona Blackshaw, Elizabeth Chomko, Mary C. Davis, Meghan Fay, Sarah
Fischer, Catherine Flye, Talisa Friedman, Caroline Gotschall, Simone
Grossman, Rose McConnell, Sarah Marshall, Mackenzie Jo Pardi, Darcy
Pommerening, Elizabeth H. Richards, Richard Stirling, Ellen Warner, Sarah Grace Wilson. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
January 4 - April 9, 2006
Fat Pig |
Reviewed January 8
Running time1:40 - no intermission
A touching
exploration of attitudes about body image
Winner of the Ushers' Favorite Show Award for January
Click here to buy the script |
After the success of Neil LaBute's The Shape of Things in 2002, Studio
mounts a festival of his works beginning with this emotionally
involving play which begins as a comedy and ends as a gripping emotional
drama. Director Paul Mullins allows the play to progress from comedy to
drama in easy steps, never forcing it to its dramatic side before the text
is ready for the transition. As a result, the impact of the final scene is
as touching as its author intended it to be. LaBute pulls no punches in this
climax, and neither do Mullins and his cast.
Storyline: Young upwardly mobile professional meets, and enjoys the
company of a young woman of extremely large proportions. They fall in love.
Can their attraction survive the disapproval of his friends and colleagues?
More to the point, can it survive his concern over their reaction?
The play poses a major challenge to a casting director.
Where to find an actress with the talent to pull off such a complex role who
has the physical proportions to make it work. A fat suit isn't an option as
LaBute, perhaps for that very reason, writes the climax in a beach scene
requiring maximum exposure. Studio solves the problem with a local actress
of impressive skills, Kate Debelack, who has previously been seen here both
in full Studio productions and in the developmental/experimental Secondstage
as well as Cherry Red, MetroStage and Project Y. The piece is obviously an
opportunity for her to dominate, and while she does a fine job of bringing
the hefty Helen to life, hers is not the strongest performance. That
distinction goes to Tyler Pierce as the slender, trendy yuppie who falls in
love with her. His final confrontation with his own limitations is the crux
of the play and he soars in its delivery.
LaBute writes fabulously deliverable dialogue with the
pace and pattern of the patter of intelligent, educated people who are
comfortable with the spoken word, yet each character has a distinct voice of
his or her own. Many of the sharpest lines in this play belong to the two
friends whose reactions to the affair are at the crux of the matter. Jason
Odell Williams knocks off one liners with aplomb, but is really at his best
when he reveals just a touch of inner angst as his character discusses his
relationship with his overweight mother. Anne Bowels throws a few blows of
her own, including one memorable upper cut.
Once again, the team of set, lights and sound
designers who created the slick, believable and striking world in which
LaBute's The Shape of Things transpired here three years ago manage
to give a play with multiple locales a unified look. From office to
apartment to restaurant, this is the world of young professionals in today's
business scene. Only in the final locale, a beach scene, does the visual
aspect falter for a bit. With characters reclining on beach towels laid out
on the carpet, the audience squirms to adjust their sight lines between the
heads in front of them in this shallowly raked house. The final, crucial
moments of the play bring that squirming to an end, however, as the tears in
the eyes of both performers capture and hold the audience's attention in the
collective experience that only the best of live theatre can provide.
Written by Neil LaBute. Directed by Paul Mullins.
Design: Debra Booth (set) Kate Turner-Walker (costumes) Michael Giannitti
(lights) Neil McFadden (sound) Carol Pratt (photography) Rebecca Berlin
(stage manager). Cast: Anne Bowles, Kate Debelack, Tyler Pierce, Jason Odell
Williams. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 2 - December 11, 2005
Guantanamo: "Honor
Bound to Defend Freedom" |
Reviewed November 6
Running time 2:05 - one intermission
A troubling look at the fate of four detainees
Click here to buy the script |
It was a quiet crowd that filed out of Studio's Milton
Theatre following the harrowing experience of this unblinking presentation
by two British authors of the result of their research into the story of four of the prisoners/detainees who have been held at the
U.S. facility at Guantanamo Bay following the attacks of September 11, 2001
and the launching of the concerted war on terror. The crowd had just come to know
these four people as human beings, and been exposed to the pain they and
their families have felt over years of incarceration. Fine performances, a
striking visual design and the unblinking direction of Serge Seiden made the
experience extremely uncomfortable. The lack of a curtain call drove home
the message of the play . . . time continues to tick away for
the one out of the four who has not yet been released from confinement.
Storyline: Constructed from letters, interviews and the public record,
the stories of four British residents, apprehended in various countries in
the wake of 9/11 and incarcerated at Guantanamo, are told without any real
defense of the position of the government that has held them for over two
years and continues to hold one without charge.
What is the dividing line between exposé and
propaganda? Is it in the eye of the beholder who asks "is this in service of
a cause I agree with?" Or is it in the work itself which satisfies the test
"does this reveal a reality previously unexamined?" The program notes for
this production liken this play to The Laramie Project, which explored
a heinous hate crime. Unlike that balanced presentation, however, which
sought to understand not only what happened but how it could happen, this
one-sided look at an on-going situation stakes out its position and sticks
with it. If you are looking for a balanced examination of all sides of this
contemporary issue, look elsewhere.
Harsh Nayyar's portrayal of the pain
of the father of a prisoner held without charge, Andrew Stewart-Jones
personification of the pride of Jamal al-Harith, and Omar Koury's depiction
of the plight of a prisoner released without his brother who is still at Guantanamo,
bring the despair of the prisoner/detainees
and their families into vibrant clarity. What is missing is any intellectually defensible portrayal of those who perpetrate
these acts in the name of national security. For a moment it appears that
the authors will deal with the complexity of the issues when the brother of
a victim of the attack on the World Trade Center takes the stage, but he
ends up rejecting the policy which allows these incarcerations. Then Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld - as performed by Leo Erickson - takes the
microphone. But, unlike The Laramie Project, which sought and
presented the views of both sides, this slice of administration policy is
selected from particularly incoherent responses at a press conference, and
not from any clear statement justifying the policy.
Gil Thompson pulls a nifty effect on the sound quality
for the opening
announcement by Lord Johan van Zyl Styn (Leo Erickson,
again) of the policy of Her Majesty's government supporting the
incarceration. It is delivered in a flat, obviously amplified PA system
feel. Later, the position of family members is given soft, full-spectrum
sonic richness. Giorgos Tsappas provides a chain link and bare bunk
environment which may be more sterile than reality, but no less troubling.
This isn't a place where you would want to spend years, which is, after all, the
authors' entire point.
Written by Victoria Brittain and Gillian Slovo.
Directed by Serge Seiden. Design: Giorgos Tsappas (set) Reggie Ray
(costumes) Michael Giannitti (lights) Gil Thompson (sound) Scott Suchman
(photography) Susie Pamudji (stage manager). Cast: Leo Erickson, Yvonne
Erickson, Kaveh Haerian, Nafees Hamid, David Bryan Jackson, Omar Koury,
John-Michael MacDonald, Ramiz Monsef, Harsh Nayyar, Andrew Stewart-Jones,
Dikran Tulaine. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
October 5 - 23, 2005
Hilda |
Reviewed October 9
Running time 1:30 - no intermission
A stylish mounting of a disappointing play
on an intriguing issue
Click here to buy the script
(in a different translation) |
There's an intriguing play hiding in the issue being raised in
French-Senegalese author Marie Ndiaye's play. After all, theater excels as a
medium to examine the connections or distinctions between human
conditions. Ndiaye seems interested in exploring the similarities and
differences between economic servitude and that outlawed horror, chattel
slavery. But her approach to the topic
here is so blunt that there is little opportunity to view it in human terms. Bad
starts out bad and stays that way. Weak starts out helpless and gets weaker.
And the real victim never even shows up.
Studio is presenting the play in a production directed by Carey Perloff, of
San Francisco's American Conservatory Theater, which is slated to
transfer from Studio directly to an Off-Broadway house called 59E59 at 59
East 59th Street in New York. The three member cast will transfer with the
show for a one month run where the ticket price will be $45 (as opposed to
$32 - $52 here.)
Storyline: A wealthy woman wants to own a servant - not simply employ
one. Her need for control and submission is complete and she manages to
destroy her new maid's life in order to remove any competition for complete
loyalty: home, husband, children.
As
written, the inappropriate, unacceptable and excessive position of the
homeowner who wants to become a servant owner is plain from the opening
scene rather than becoming clear little by little over the course of the
evening. What is more, that should be as clear to the maid's husband as it
is to the audience and yet he seems inexplicably powerless to just say no.
We never actually see the woman she has
decided to obtain. All the negotiations over the terms of "employment," which
are laden with layers of manipulation, are with the poor maid's husband. How
he could have agreed to some of the demands and how his wife could have
consented to abide by his capitulation is never made either clear or
believable.
Still, there is an enjoyable performance here in the
work of Ellen Karas as the employer/owner/manipulator/controller. She's cool
and calculating, but, as with many forms of evil, it is hard to take your
eyes off her. Michael Earle has the unenviable task of trying to make the
husband of the maid human, and, while he can't quite make his decisions
understandable, he makes his pain over their consequences palpable. He has
one moment staring over the audience's heads to see his no-longer-available
wife that is memorably intense.
Stylish is the term for the visual impact of the
production. Donald Eastman designed a stark all-white set dominated by a
staircase coming down from the flies without banister or carpet runner - a pure
geometric construct. The white rear wall is a cloth drop rather than a solid
surface, however, and distractingly ripples whenever an actor walks near it. Nancy Schertler's
lights and shadows signal that different scenes take place in different
locations and David F. Draper's costumes give Karas a chromatic dominance to
match her characters' emotional dominance. David Lang takes the few lines in
the dialogue about mechanical music box dolls as the cue for a tinkling
musical score.
Written by Marie Ndiaye. Translated by Erika Rundle.
Directed by Carey Perloff. Design: Donald Eastman (set) David F. Draper
(costumes) Nancy Schertler (lights) David Lang (original music) Carol Pratt
(photography) Karen Storms (stage manager). Cast: Brandy Burre, Michael
Earle, Ellen Karas. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
September 7 - October 16, 2005
A Number |
Reviewed September 11
Running time 1 Hour - no intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for twin fabulous performances in a
fascinating short play
Click here to buy the script |
What is it with
Caryl Churchill, author of Cloud Nine,
Far Away and
Top Girls, which is now playing in a
Fountainhead Theatre production at Arlington's Theatre on the Run? Her plays
all seem to start out with fabulous concepts digging into intriguing
questions. The longer they last, however, the less captivating they seem to
become. This play has no such problem for it doesn't last long enough to
become unfocused or predictable. Indeed, it only lasts 56 minutes and that
includes an extended curtain call - extended not by the company's effort to
stretch, but by the audience's refusal to stop applauding. The accolades are
for Ted van Griethuysen and Tom Story, two actors we all know can chew up
the stage with emotion and intelligence because we have seen them do it here
before. The accolades are also, however, for Churchill's sharp script that
posits about one intellectual puzzle per minute, and for Joy Zinnoman who
selected the piece in the first place and then directs.
Storyline: A young man discovers that he is, in fact, but one of a number
of clones created out of the genetic material of his father's first son, who
died at an early age. The father, however, claims to have been unaware that
more than one copy was created, and neither father nor son are quite sure
which "son" is even the original clone.
Joy Zinoman directed Ted van Griethuysen and Tom Story,
in The Invention of Love, and all three of them came away with Helen
Hayes Award nominations in 2002. Here they sink their considerable dramatic
teeth into a piece that seems even shorter than its less than one hour
duration, for the time flies by at a tremendous clip. It engages the audience
in questions, then moves on without answering them, for most of the questions
are just beginning to emerge out of the world of genetic science. Churchill
identifies rather than resolves the quandaries and van Griethuysen and Story
put human faces on them.
It is hard to assess which is the more challenging
role. Story has to convincingly create a half-dozen different characters.
All look the same and have the same genetic make up. Each, however, is the
product of a different set of childhood experiences and circumstances. Van
Griethuysen, however, remains the same person but is revealed in more and
more depth and in different lights as more and more of the truth of the
situation is unveiled. Neither actor makes a single noticeable misstep in
the fast paced performance.
Zinoman avoids the trap of letting the design elements
become distracting even as each makes a striking contribution to the whole.
Debra Booth's spare set seems at first just a square of carpet and a chair.
Only as the events unfold do you become aware of screens for the projections
of Erik Trester. Brandee Mathies provides costumes that can make the entire
journey of the play without anyone taking a moment for a change, even during
the periodic dousing of Michael Lincoln's surgically precise lighting. Gil
Thompson uses some judicious editing and sampling to create a score out of
the Lennon, McCarntey White Album staple "Birthday."
Written by Caryl Churchill. Directed by Joy Zinoman.
Design: Debra Booth (set) Brandee Mathies (costumes) Michael Lincoln
(lights) Erik Trester (projections) Gil Thompson (sound) Karen Storms (stage
manager). Cast: Tom Story, Ted van Griethuysen. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
May 18 - August 14, 2005
Take Me Out |
Reviewed May 22
Running time 2:10 - one intermission
* Mature themes/nudity
Winner of the Ushers' Favorite Show Award
for both May and June
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for the exhilaration that comes from a superb
production of a fine play
Click here to buy the script |
The Studio Theatre production of
Richard Greenberg's Tony Award winning play gives you the thrill that only a
superb production of a marvelous play can provide. It sends you out
exhilarated by the experience. To begin with, the play is eloquent in its
social commentary, humorous in its portrayal of what the allegiance to a
sport, a team or a friend means to modern day adults, and compassionate in
its view of human strengths and weaknesses. It slides from plot point to
character revelation to intellectual observation with an easy seamlessness,
at least when directed with style and a sense of pace which it gets here in the
smooth direction of Kirk Jackson. The production is blessed with fine
performances including two standout performances that are not to be
missed. Then, too, it has a scene of choreographic beauty remarkable in a
show without a choreographer being listed in the program.
Storyline: A baseball star causes a
public furor when he publicly acknowledges his homosexuality. He causes less
discomfort in the locker room and showers than might be expected until the
team hits a slump and brings up a new player from the minor leagues. The new
arrival is just what the team needed on the field, but has a streak of
bigotry that emerges in a press conference, tearing asunder the worlds of the newly outed star, the entire team and baseball
itself.
That Greenberg can write fascinating scripts comes as no
surprise to those who attended Rep Stage's production of
The Dazzle in 2003. The
strengths of Greenberg's scripts are are considerable:
nimble plotting, marvelous dialogue, very well constructed characters and a
lot of seemingly quotable lines that flit past you so quickly you feel you
would rather read the script than watch the show so you can linger over the
pithy observations. But if you did read, instead of watch, you would miss the fun of
watching just what director Jackson and the standouts in his cast do with
the material. Solution? Go see the show, then buy the script to savor the
wordplay.
The sports icon who takes himself out, revealing his
homosexuality almost casually, expecting no adverse consequences because bad
things don't happen to him - others yes, but not him - is smoothly played by
M.D. Walton who played that role under the original director, Joe Mantello,
in post-Broadway productions. Tug Coker does a fine job as well as his
narrating best friend. Both are making their Studio debuts. The Potomac Region
debut that is breathtaking, however, comes from Jake Suffian as the
apparently homophobic, nearly inarticulate player whose arrival from the
minor leagues shakes up the team. He is riveting in his ability to
communicate to the audience through the emotion of voice and gesture just
what his character can't communicate to his teammates. At the other end of
the communication scale is the character of the gay financial adviser who
discovers the wonders of baseball late in a life that has been, till then,
quite empty. It is a role that earned the Tony Award for Denis O'Hare on
Broadway. Here it is a role that is owned by Rick Foucheux. Having seen both
perform it, our preference is for Foucheaux.
The design here is sort of a miniature of the way it
was on Broadway, with the ball park's lights facing the audience, the
baseball diamond represented in a playing space in front of the movable
locker-room lockers and the exposed (in more ways than one) shower. The
matter of fact nudity is, if anything, a bit more intense because the
audience is much closer to it. The nudity is in no way gratuitous or
superfluous. As the script points out, a consequence of the announcement of
homosexuality is the loss of innocence in the club house ... "we now know we
are naked." It would be awfully hard to deliver that line wearing a towel.
The afternoon we saw this production there was an audible groan from one
member of the audience when the first naked ball player walked into the
locker room, but the audience soon became too absorbed in the text, plot,
characters, humor and language to spend too much of its energy concentrating
on nudity.
Written by Richard Greenberg. Directed by Kirk
Jackson. Design: Daniel Conway (set) Reggie Ray (costumes) Michelle Elwyn
(properties) Michael Lincoln (lights) Neil McFadden (sound)
Susie Pamudji (stage manager). Cast: Tug Coker, Matthew Deiss, Rick
Foucheux, Anthony Gallagher, Joel Reuben Ganz, Cesar A. Guadamuz, Ikuma
Isaac, Tom Quinn, Jake Suffian, M.D. Walton, Jeorge Bennett Watson.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
March 9 - April 24, 2005
Afterplay |
Reviewed March 13
Running time 1:10 - no intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick
for delightful performances in an intriguing small play
Click here to buy the script |
Heat up the samovar! Warm your hands by the tiny space heater! Pull up a
chair and enjoy an hour (plus a few minutes) with two major treasures of
theater in the Potomac Region, as two minor treasures of the output of Anton Checkhov, in a story imagined by a contemporary Irish playwright with a deep
affinity for the source. Joy Zinoman has brought Nancy Robinette and Edward
Gero together with this new script by Brian Friel as sort of a sweet desert
after the full meal of her "Russian Winter Season" which began with the
delightful appetizer, Floyd King in The
Russian National Postal Service, and settled into the heavy courses of
Ivanov and
Black Milk.
Storyline: Twenty years after the events that ended Checkov's plays
Uncle Vanya and Three Sisters, Vanya's niece Sonya and the three
sisters' brother Andrey have met and struck up a brief friendship in a tiny
tea shop in Moscow. The next night, they meet again, no longer just by
chance but now because each hoped the other would appear. They share tea,
stories, vodka, lies and truths about themselves and about the people in
their lives, people we first came to know in Checkhov's plays.
This is one of three short plays that
Irish playwright Brian Friel (Translations, Dancing at Lughnasa, Faith
Healer) has written carrying Checkov's material beyond the originals. He
knows a thing or two of his source, having translated Three Sisters for
production in the 1980s. His own plays are often compared to Checkov for
their simple sweetness, plain poignant language and a concentration on the
revealing minutiae of everyday life. Here he adds the intriguing aspect of
carrying forward stories from two of Chekhov's better known plays in a game
of intellectual speculation. The audience doesn't need to bring an
encyclopedic knowledge of the source plays to enjoy this one, however, as
the two characters and the stories they share with each other are interesting
enough on their own.
The real pleasure of the piece as produced
here, however, is the chance to watch Robinette and Gero work together in
such sympathetic compatibility. Her ability to just hint at rather than
succumb to the flightiness that seems natural to Sonya after the death of
Vanya is a marvel, and his ability to signal the inner thoughts of Andrey
with a twitch, a glance or a pause is extraordinary. To see the two of them
play off each other at the leisurely pace that Friel's script provides is a
pleasure. They take the time to establish tiny character details well before
the details of the story begin to accumulate. As a result, when each
character has to admit to having bragged a bit too much and inflated their
stories a bit to far, things that had been puzzling become clear.
Oh, what a set these two have to inhabit!
Debra Booth plunks what appears to be a real cafe down in front of the
exposed rear wall of the new Methany Theatre in the expanded Studio Theatre
complex. Details from the grime on the windows to the worn tile mosaic floor
testifies to better days while the dinginess, perhaps due to Michael Giannitti's careful lighting, carries both the chill of a Moscow evening
outside and the intimate warmth of the interior where a glass of tea or a
bowl of cabbage soup (with fresh brown bread) can get an evening off to a
grand start. Of course, the vodka Robinette produces from her bag helps a
great deal as well.
Written by Brian Friel. Directed by Joy
Zinoman. Design: Debra Booth (set) Devon Painter (costumes) Michelle Elwyn
(properties) Michael Giannitti (lights) Gil Thompson (sound) Carol Pratt
(photography) Rebecca Berlin (stage manager). Cast: Edward Gero, Nancy
Robinette. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
January 5 - March 6, 2005
Black Milk |
Reviewed January 9
Running time 1:45 - one intermission
Click here to buy the script |
Serge Seiden directs Holly Twyford and Matthew Montelongo in a Post-Soviet Russian play about a pair of young
travelers hawking cheap goods to rural bumpkins. They were good together in
Far Away last season and they are even better together this time out. The
production is visually satisfying and the collection of quirky characters in
the supporting cast, including those played by the inestimable
June Hansen, the humorous Anne Stone and the touching Elizabeth Stripe are
solid as well. All of this talent is in service to a script that, while
replete with intriguing concepts, peppered with sharp dialogue and
attempting to grapple with a major topic - the chaos that has enveloped
Russia in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union - leaves something to
be desired.
Storyline: Two young hustlers from Moscow descend on a rural Russian
village in the post-Soviet economic turmoil determined to make a killing
selling toasters to the peasants they think are too dumb to know they can't
be used to bake bread or heat rolls. The pair are also lovers and the woman
is eight months pregnant, not that either of them have given a moment's
thought to their future as parents or the welfare of the child. When the
birth finally takes place, the first glimmers of maternal instincts threaten
to disrupt their relationship, much to the consternation of the new father
who would not let a little thing like parenthood stand in his way,
disrupting an otherwise good con.
Some plays are plot driven and some are
people driven. A plot driven show (murder mystery, whodunit, clever scam,
etc) can work with characters that are less than compelling, but a people
driven show such as as this one requires at least that the central
characters be so well drawn that you know not only how they are but how they
got that way. That is what is missing from this otherwise interesting piece.
The two central characters, the con man from Moscow and his oh-so-pregnant
compatriot, are certainly intense and interesting, but they are flawed human
beings and the playwright never lets us understand why.
Yes, the Soviet Union has collapsed and social chaos has ensued. However,
the glimmer of what they might have been is missing, and without that, they
are interesting only in their depravity, not in their humanity.
Twyford's role of the immature, self-absorbed
woman/child whose concept of self discipline is to put newspapers on a bench
before sitting down is the more complex of the two leads as she gets to show
the humanizing impact of at least the flicker of maternal instinct. As is
often the case, she is very good at showing the thought process of a
character who doesn't let an errant thought take root. She is also
quite good at really letting go in a knock-down, drag-out argument. Montelongo
matches her in those argument scenes and he imbues his control-freak of a
character with a strength that Twyford plays off marvelously. When they
finally come to the second act confrontation that is the real reason for all
that went before it, the release is impressive indeed.
Designer Michael Philippi's seedy, almost
collapsing set provides the right atmosphere for this backwater train depot,
including the ticket sellers cage with its pass-through drawer and a rickety
wood stove. The faded linoleum floor provides plenty of space for the
struggles as well as for the final visual effect. Alex Jaeger's costumes
capture the difference between the generations as well as the geographical
differences between the two Moscovites and the natives of the rural village.
Who knows where properties designer Michelle Elwyn come up with so many
toaster boxes with the appropriate foreign-language looking labels, but one
wishes she could have also come up with Russian language newspapers so the
English advertisements couldn't be read on the papers covering benches,
spills and derelicts.
Written by Vassily Sigarev. Translated by
Sasha Dugdale. Directed by Serge Seiden. Design: Michael Philippi (set and
lights) Alex Jaeger (costumes) Michelle Elwyn (properties) Gil Thompson
(sound) Scott Suchman (photography) Susie Pamudji (stage manager). Cast:
Carol Arthur, Tobin Atkinson, Bob Barr, Morgan Peter Brown, Tina Renay Fulp,
June Hansen, Marynell Hinton, Matthew Montelongo, Anne Stone, Elizabeth
Stripe, Holly Twyford, Jeff Wisniewski. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 3 - December 12, 2004
Ivanov |
Reviewed November 10
Running time 2:45 - one intermission
Click here to buy the script |
Sometimes, when a play is announced as a rarely performed piece from an
important playwright of the past, there is a good reason the play hasn't
been seen very often. Certainly that seems to be the case here in this first
full length play by the Russian genius who did so much to bring serious
theater out of the depths of old traditions, opening up possibilities
exploited by so many others over the past century to explore "modern" themes
in new ways. Anton Chekhov went on from this 1889 effort to give the
world The Seagull, Uncle Vanya, and The Cherry Orchard. Much
of what made those classics so important can be seen in embryo in this early
effort, but clearly Chekhov learned from his experiences, turning out better
products later on. Thus, this piece can fascinate theater historians and
this production certainly has a few performances to enjoy in some of the
more energetic scenes, but it is more intriguing for its promise than for
what it delivers.
Storyline: Ivanov is a man in the midst of
what might today be called a mid-life crisis, thrown into fits of depression
by the realization that much of what he has done with his past doesn't
fulfill his view of his potential and that his once limitless prospects are
being hemmed in by his mortality. He's been a rebel, a Christian marrying a
Jew in heavily anti-Semitic culture, a free thinker in a conformist society,
an intellectual in a world where that is a rarity. Now things are going very
badly in his life. Not only has he hit on bad financial times, his
self-image is shattered when he becomes infatuated with a young woman just
as his wife is dying of tuberculosis.
The initial image of Philip Goodwin as Ivanov
could be a painting depicting the essence of depression, sitting with a book
nearly dropping from his hand, ignored in a reverie of deep anguish. Indeed,
the image is so strong, there's hardly anywhere for Goodwin as an actor to
go with the part - it is all simply elaboration of everything he summed up
in his posture and expression. As directed by Joy Zinoman, he proceeds
through most of the evening to mumble many of his key lines either facing
away from parts of the audience or speaking into a wall or his hand. Unlike
those of the rest of the large cast, Goodwin's lines are at times hard to
hear.
That cast includes some of the area's most
recognizable faces delivering their expected strong performances. There is
Nancy Robinette as the wife of a local official twittering away. There is
Michael Tolaydo as the manager of Ivanov's estate using his impressive
energy to try to get him to cough up with the money needed to run the place.
There is the sublime David Sabin as a sharp spoken Count, wise to the ways
of the world. The two women in Ivanov's life are well played by Susan Wilder
as his dying wife and Jenna Sokolowsi as the young girl who catches his eye
at the very moment he is both most vulnerable and most duty-bound to resist.
Less familiar, but no less satisfying, is Brilane Bowman as the wealthy
widow who has her sights on Sabin's title. Overdoing it a bit, however, are
J. Fred Shiffman as Robinett's husband who is turned tipsy rather than
morose by excesses of vodka and Tom Story as an insufferably superior doctor
who, seeing what is happening in Ivanov's household, can't contain his
disapproval.
Zinoman's production features a design
concept that frankly escapes me. Just what are we to make of the fact that
the men in 1888 Russia are all wearing jeans manufactured by the Levi
Strauss Company? Why are the women wearing their corsets outside their outer
clothing? Why are some of the younger ones wearing diaphanous crinolines
over tights? And why is the distressed concrete back wall of the theater
exposed? Why is the sound design replete with music more modern than the
time? Yes, they are performing a version of the play adapted by modern
playwright David Hare who uses a slightly modern idiom for some of the
dialogue, but this production doesn't seem grounded in either the "then" or
the "now" nor is it timeless. Instead, it is confusing. The audience - or at
least this reviewer - spends more time and energy trying to figure out what
the production is about than following what the play is about. That is
rarely a good thing.
Written by Anton Chekhov. Translated or
adapted by David Hare. Directed by Joy Zinoman. Design: Russell Metheny
(set) Helen Q. Huang (costumes) Michelle Elwyn (properties) Michael Lincoln
(lights) Gil Thompson (sound) Scott Suchman (photography) Karen Storms
(stage manager). Cast: Kevin Boggs, Brilane Bowman, Jenny Crooks, Catherine
Deadman, Kate Debelack, Sarah Fischer, Philip Goodwin, Tom Kearney, James
Konicek, Joe Lorenz, Nancy Paris, Nancy Robinette, David Sabin, J. Fred
Shiffman, Jenna Sokolowski, Tom Story, Michael Tolaydo, Susan Wilder.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
September 8 - October 17, 2004
The Russian
National Postal Service |
Reviewed September 12
Running time 1:25 - no intermission
t A Potomac
Stages pick for superb treatment of a unique and intriguing concept |
What magic live theater can work! Here, in
what must be the most enrapturing 90 minutes so far in the season just
getting started, the mind of an everyman copes with dislocation in an
impersonal world in a way that may make everyone want to disappear into
their own fantasy world in a new way - through correspondence between
oneself and anyone one wants, even unreachable celebrities. The play, by a
young playwright from Yekaterinburg (yes, the city in central Russia where
the last Tsar and his family were assassinated), is a well constructed
little gem of a piece. The Studio Theatre gives it its U.S. premiere in a
production that matches its spirit of gentle humanity, humor and pathos.
Storyline: Ivan Sidorovich Zhukov may have been a nobody in the Soviet
Union in which he grew up, but he wasn't prepared for surviving its demise. A
widower whose pension is being eroded by inflation, he begins building
a fantasy world by writing letters to himself and then replying to them. At
first it is just letters from long lost friends but soon his correspondents
include Lenin, Stalin and even Queen Elizabeth II. What is more, his fantasy
correspondents begin
to take an interest in him beyond simply responding to his letters. Is
his tiny one-room apartment big enough for all of them?
Floyd King begins the magic from the opening
moment with a completely unexpected and unorthodox gesture with a pen, and
proceeding through the mental evolution of his character, with the clarity
that only a gifted clown can craft. He can be simultaneously heart rending
and endearing as when his Ivan Sidorovich recoils from the recognition of
his own handwriting in an answer from a celebrity, and withdraws into a
deeper level of fantasy in compensation -- all without a word. His mind conjures up such marvelous
specters, however. There's Catherine Flye in a stunning turn as Queen
Elizabeth II (complete with crown jewels, silk gloves and a royal gesture
carried on through the curtain call). There's Tobin Atkinson as the animated
image of Lenin (under a wig that's a bit obvious in the close
quarters of Studio's Mead Theatre).
Paul Mullins makes his Studio directorial
debut, displaying a sure touch at every turn. Just as the script builds
slowly from quiet intimacy into explosive cacophony, so the staging moves
ever so surely from quiet images of King alone at a writing desk to a unique
stage picture of imagination gone wild. Through it all, Debra Booth's nicely
catawampus apartment walls contain and define events
that catch the eye and Alex Jaeger's costumes lend an air of realism gone
wild in the mind.
Of special note is the marvelously subtle but
constantly effective soundscape provided by Neil McFadden. So often in
theater these days, a scene taking place indoors in a busy city will begin
with a snippet of traffic noise from the street which strangely disappears
as soon as there is dialogue it might mask. Not so with McFadden's
assemblage of horns, jack hammers, sirens, engine sounds and cries. It
continues throughout the show but never interferes with a line or a moment.
It subtly dims to allow for needed moments of quiet but these dimmings seem
perfectly consistent with the descent of King's character into fantasy. As
nicely done as it is, however, it is but one example of the fine attention
to detail that permeates the production.
Written by Oleg Bogaev. Translated by John
Freedman. Directed by Paul Mullins. Design: Debra Booth (set) Alex Jaeger
(costumes) Michelle Elwyn (properties) Michael Giannitti (lights) Neil
McFadden (sound) Carol Pratt (photography) Susie Pamudji (stage manager).
Cast: Tobin Atkinson, Cecil E. Baldwin, John Collins, Amy Couchoud,
Catherine Flye, Anthony Gallagher, Floyd King, Scott McCormick, Roseanne
Medina, Steven Notes, Sasha Olinick, Michael C. Wilson. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
May 19 – June 27, 2004
The Cripple of Inishmaan |
Reviewed May 23
Running time 2 hours 35 minutes
Click here to buy the script |
How to categorize the plays of Martin McDonagh?
Comedy? Well, they are clearly intended to draw a lot of laughs. Tragedy?
They do tend to be filled with human pain and suffering. Character sketches?
They are filled with quirky folk. Satire? Well - you get the idea. The work
of McDonagh is practically suis generis, and Serge Seiden's production of his
1996 play, the first in his trilogy of plays set on the tiny island of
Inishmaan in mouth of Galway Bay in 1934, hits all the elements found in the
script. As a result, its almost as difficult to categorize as is the play.
Satisfying and entertaining and frequently absorbing, it can also be
confusing and confounding. In the final analysis, it draws you along for an
entire evening but leaves you with a few questions such as "What was that?"
Storyline: A crippled boy lives on a tiny
Irish island with his two "aunts" who took him in as an infant after the death
of his parents. He learns that the famous filmmaker Robert Flaherty
(director of the classic "Nanook of the North") has come to a neighboring
island to film a documentary of life on the Irish Sea. He talks a local
boatman into taking him over to the other island in the hope of landing a
role in the movie and actually gets a chance to to go to Hollywood to make a screen test.
That is as close as he gets to stardom or even success,
however, returning home to face an existence even less palatable now that he has a
greater understanding of what he is missing due to his physical handicap,
his poverty and the harshness of the relationships between the few people
who populate this tiny backwater community.
McDonagh seems to have a thing for trilogies.
His best known plays are the three "Connemara Trilogy plays, The Beauty
Queen of Leenan, A Scull in Connemara and The Lonesome West. He also has a
thing for debunking myths and here he's doing his best to de-romanticize the
harsh life of the Irish people. The people of this play are strong
characterizations although they are not terribly complex. They are defined
by their quirks - the newsmonger who peddles second hand stories, the old
woman who is drinking herself to death, the youngster with a sweet tooth,
the old biddies trying to eke out a meager living from an ill-stocked store.
Here they are given spirit through some marvelous performances.
David Marks as the aforementioned newsmonger
is a pleasure to watch from start to finish. He is instantly peculiar but
his oddity doesn't wear thin over the course of the play. Susan Lynsky, on
the other hand, starts out just bit too strong in her portrayal of the
bullying local girl, and there is not much subtlety there until her
character mellows just a bit at the end. The delightful team
of Brigid Cleary and Rosemary Regan as the biddies who took in the cripple
avoids overdoing their eccentricities which keeps their characters
interesting all the way through. The strongest single part is the title role
played here with strong physicality by Aubrey Deeker who drags his leg and
twists his arm, creating a convincing crippled state and hacking with
believable force with the tuberculosis which plays a significant function in
the plot.
Tony Cisek's spare set and Alex Jaeger's worn
out looking costumes reflect the un-romantic view of life on the Emerald
Isle - no green fields nor blue seas against sparkling skies with rainbows
breaking through. It is a hard life that McDonagh writes about and the
bleakness of it all is exposed through even the small details of empty
shelves and Michael Giannitti's gray-toned lighting design. In act II the
residents of the island get their first look at the movie made on the
neighboring island. It is shown on a make-shift screen and seems to be
silent despite the fact that Man of Aran was Flaherty's
first sound film.
Written by Martin McDonagh. Directed by Serge
Seiden. Design: Tony Cisek (set) Alex Jaeger (costumes) Michelle Elwyn
(properties) Michael Giannitti (lights) Neil McFadden (sound) Scott Suchman
(photography) Rachel A. Homan (stage manager). Cast Brigid Cleary, Terrence
Currier, Aubrey Deeker, June Hansen, Tom Kearney, Susan Lynskey, David
Marks, Rosemary Reagan, Mark Jude Sullivan.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
March 31 – May 23, 2004
Far Away |
Reviewed April 11
Running time 45 minutes |
The discussion in rows D
and E in the center section of the intimate house on the second floor of the
Studio Theatre when the lights came up just a little over a half hour after
they went down: "What was that?" "You mean its over?" "I hoped they would
explain it in the second act." "The more I think about it the better I like
it." Be aware that this brief but intense insertion into a very theatrical
world is designed to unsettle, upset and challenge an audience. But, truth
to tell, there aren't a lot of new insights into the human condition
offered, even though some long accepted views are called up in compelling
images.
Storyline: A young girl witnesses some
unspoken and unspeakable horror and grows up suppressing the memory. She goes to work in a hat factory but her
output simply decorates the heads of the condemned. She and her co-worker
fall in love and marry but they don't achieve "happily ever after." Instead,
they are beaten down by the impact of ongoing conflict in the adult world.
This production is intensely theatrical, but
just what is "theatricality?"
The first definition is "relating to or typical of the theater or dramatic
performance" and that is probably the intention behind this treatment of a
script loaded with allusions, and sharp verbal imagery. But the full effect is more appropriately
described with the second definition: "full of exaggerated or false
emotion." The direction by Joy Zinoman and the work of an excellent cast
highlights every last point about the human condition in Caryl Churchill's
obtuse script, but there aren't a lot of ideas that are either original or
particularly insightful, and those there are aren't given time to develop.
There are three scenes in the play, each
centering on a character named "Joan." In the first, she is a young girl who
has come downstairs at two in the morning because she has seen some
unsettling things while staying the night in the home of her aunt and uncle.
A ten year old newcomer to Studio's stages, Simone Grossman, exhibits a
great deal of stage presence in the delivery of Churchill's dialogue which
dribbles out details with an effective economy. The aunt is a smooth as silk
Mikel Sarah Lambert whose manipulation of her niece is simultaneously
sympathetic and suspicious.
For the final two scenes, one of which is
really five blackouts separated by a tableau, Holly Twyford is the more
mature Joan. In the middle piece she's chipper and perky, having
suppressed the horror of her night with her Aunt and Uncle. She's
seductively attractive to a colleague played with verve by Matthew Montelongo. The
tableau is a marvelously staged parade of the tragically
condemned who sport the chapeaux created in the factory where Joan and her
beau work. But that scene yields to a vision of an apocalypse in which
Joan is totally anguished. Twyford
makes it memorable, even if it seems prematurely climactic.
Written by Caryl Churchill. Directed by Joy
Zinoman. Design: Debra Booth (set) Helen Q. Huang (costumes) Michelle Elwyn
(properties) Michael Lincoln (Lights) Gil Thompson (sound) Michael Gallant
(music) Scott Suchman (photography) Susie Pamudji (stage manager). Cast: Simone Grossman, Mikel Sarah
Lambert, Matthew Montelongo, Holly Twyford. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
February 13 – April 4, 2004
The Syringa Tree |
Reviewed February 15
Running time 1 hour 50 minutes
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for
a captivating performance
of a powerful play
Winner of the 2004 annual Usher's Favorite Show Award
|
What
young actress Gin Hammond does with Pamela Gien's powerful script is nothing
short of captivating. She takes what is already a powerful and memorable
play and turns it into a nearly unforgettable evening in the theater. In
many a solo-performance piece the audience is transported into a single
individual's world. In this one, the audience is transported into the world
of an entire community, two interlocking families and their neighbors in a
society stretched to the breaking point as the battle between prejudice and
justice comes to a head. It is a subject that has been treated many times
before by great playwrights and great performers, but rarely has it been
given such a warmly human, understandable and heart-tugging sense of
reality.
Storyline: One actress creates all the
members of two families, one white and one black, in the critical time for
their native country, South Africa. The play covers a society steeped in apartheid through
its transition to a pluralistic society after
the fall of the separatist regime.
The struggle for human rights and dignity in South Africa has been a
fruitful subject for playwrights for decades, and some fine writers have
tried to tackle the subject. The finest have found ways to humanize the
history of that beautiful but torn land. Think of Lost in the Stars,
the Kurt Weill/Maxwell Anderson musical version of Alan Paton's Cry the
Beloved Country. Think of Athol Fugard's
The Island which brought
John Kani and Winston Ntshona to the Kennedy Center a few years ago, or his
Master Harold ...and the Boys that was given such a searingly lovely
production in this same theater four years ago. Now add Pamela Gien's Obie, Drama Desk, Outer Critics Circle and Drama League award winning play
to the list. Just as some of Fugard's most powerful writing came directly
from his own experience, so Gien's images and episodes come directly from
her memory growing up in South Africa. But as autobiographical as the piece
may be, it is not the story of a young white girl in a sheltered home but
the story of all the people, black and white, of British, African or
Africaaner in her circle from the time she was six years old till young
adulthood.
Gin Hammond, who earned the adjective
"radiant" in our review of her performance in Arena Stage's production of
Polk County two years ago, has spent a sizeable portion of the time since
then performing this play in New Haven, Seattle, Pasadena and Beverly Hills.
She is an amazingly flexible actress who can create the physical impression
of a six year old girl or an 82-year old man and just about everything in
between. What is more, she can make the transitions from one to the other
with such subtlety that she can carry on a conversation between her multiple
selves without the slightest sense of a switch being thrown or a scene being
cut. As her six year old asks an innocent question of her heavily pregnant
nanny, she can become the nanny, ponder the question and reply without a
hint of artifice.
But this performance is not a gimmicky parade
of characters intentionally drawn as broadly as possible in order to give
the performer a chance to impress. Instead, it is a finely wrought survey of
human attitudes in a society under pressure. Each character has a view, each
has a history and each has a set of hopes and fears for the future that are
revealed subtly in their actions and their statements. This one-act play
packs so many lives into its less than two hours that you emerge with a
feeling of completeness. That is a feeling that theatergoers savor - and
find all too infrequently.
Written by Pamela Gien. Directed by J.R.
Sullivan. Design: Michael Philippi (set and lights) Brandee Mathies
(costume) Tony Angelini (sound) T. Charles Erickson (Photography) Rachael
Homan (stage manager). Cast: Gin Hammond. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
December 3, 2003 – January 11, 2004
The York Realist |
Reviewed December 7
Running time 1 hour 50 minutes |
Sometimes theater offers you an opportunity for immersion into a world you
wouldn’t otherwise get to know. When it is good, it is more than a fantasy
travel program because you get to know and understand real people who
inhabit that world. Such is the case here with Studio Theatre giving this
very British short play a superb American premiere. It is a trip to the middle of the island
that is England and Scotland. More to the point, it is a trip to the middle
class of English society in the 1960s. The time may not be as important as
the place but the sense of class distinction is central to the play's worth. And,
as specific as it is to the rural society of Yorkshire and Humberside, the
region of England where the entire piece plays out, it raises a few
universal issues of the human condition as well.
Storyline: A young farmer living with his ailing mother in a tenant’s
cottage outside of York is recruited to perform in a local play by its
assistant director, up from London for the project. They are both gay and
are soon in love. Neither can bring himself to abandon his own life in
either the big city or the remote countryside to make their relationship
permanent.
The
play by Peter Gill has some of the feeling of a 1960s version of Lady
Chatterly’s Lover, which may not be surprising given that Gill was
instrumental in the popularity of stage versions of DH Lawrence. This play
opened in a touring version in England but struck such a chord it settled
into a successful run in London. It is no wonder, for given a substantial
production the play provides ample enjoyment and Studio certainly
provides that substantial production. On a set that looks as if it might
just be a cottage from the fields of Yorkshire, a cast of solid performers
give life to seven characters as they interact in scenes both absorbing and
believable. There is nothing over done, no excess to distract from the
central dilemma of the relationship between the two men whose worlds are too
different and whose attraction to each other, while real, is insufficient to
overcome other barriers.
Markus Potter is the strapping young farmer whose supple muscles are the
product of labor in the fields. He’s at ease with his body and his sexuality
even as he knows it wouldn’t be accepted in his community. Tom Story is the
visitor from the big city where his sexuality is only somewhat less unacceptable. Neither the script nor the production offers any titillating
exposures. Indeed, the young lovers rarely even touch and they take their
coupling upstairs out of sight of audience or of the mother who shares the
cottage. The play isn’t about irresistible compulsion or overwhelming
passion, it is about accommodation and acceptance.
Faith
Potts is gentle and touching as the mother who gives her son the respect he
deserves and refuses to pry into secrets she knows are there but which
aren’t as important as how he lives his life as an adult member of the
family and the community. There are gentle, honest performances by Colleen
Delany, as the girl from the neighboring farm who harbors hopes for marriage,
and by Joe Baker as the farmer’s nephew. The farmer’s sister and her husband
shed even more light on the farmer’s life choices.
Written by Peter Gill. Directed by Serge Seiden. Design: Russell Metheny
(set) Devon Painter (costumes) Michelle Elwyn (properties) Dan Covey
(lights) Dave McKeever (sound) Carol Pratt (photography) Wendy Flora (stage
manager). Cast: Joe Baker, Lawrence C. Daly, Colleen Delany, Markus Potter,
Faith Potts, Nanette Savard, Tom Story. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
October 22 – December 14, 2003
The Life of Galileo |
Reviewed November 7
Running time 2 hours 45 minutes
t
Potomac Stages Pick |
First and foremost, this is an evening of Ted van Griethuysen making the
most of a part that is rich, deep, human and consistently fascinating. A
performance this strong would swamp a weaker script or a lesser cast. It is
a pleasure to report that the script is lively, literate and consistently
intriguing and that the cast assembled by director David Salter in this
return to the piece he and van Griethuysen mounted in London last year
provides the quality and depth necessary to make this more than just a star
turn. It is an intellectual delight.
Storyline: In the mid-seventeenth century Galileo Galilei -- the “inventor”
of the telescope, founder of the modern scientific approach and advocate of
the Copernican view that the Earth is not the center of the Universe --
struggles to balance intellectual curiosity, scientific honesty, religious
doctrine, family responsibility and personal comfort as his fame spreads
throughout Europe and the powers of church and state are brought to bear on
him.
Van
Griethuysen is a gentle giant in both his physical domination of the stage
and his character’s intellectual domination of his time. He makes this
Galileo very human with traits that engender admiration, affection,
frustration and condemnation from his contemporaries and the audience alike.
Those contemporaries are portrayed by a cast fewer in number than would be
ideal but harboring no shortage of talent and ability. There is a great deal
of doubling which can be confusing in this sprawling story which takes place
over nearly thirty years in Padua, Venice, Florence and Rome.
Among
those turning in a fine performance (or multiple fine performances) are
Lawrence Redmond, Valerie Leonard, Leo Erickson, and Conrad Feininger. Bette
Cassatt tries mightily to breathe life into the least well developed major
part in the play, that of Galileo’s daughter (yes, the same character as in
Dava Sobel’s marvelous 1999 best seller “Galileo’s Daughter”). Sixth grader
Peter Vance is notably effective in his professional debut, holding his own
on stage with van Griethuysen as a young student receiving some of the
master’s wisdom.
Helen
Q. Huang‘s parchment and brass set is striking upon ry to make this more than just a star
turn. It is an intellectual delight.
Storyline: In the mid-seventeenth century Galileo Galilei -- the “inventor”
of the telescope, founder of the modern scientific approach and advocate of
the Copernican view that the Earth is not the center of the Universe --
struggles to balance intellectual curiosity, scientific honesty, religious
doctrine, family responsibility and personal comfort as his fame spreads
throughout Europe and the powers of church and state are brought to bear on
him.
Van
Griethuysen is a gentle giant in both his physical domination of the stage
and his character’s intellectual domination of his time. He makes this
Galileo very human with traits that engender admiration, affection,
frustration and condemnation from his contemporaries and the audience alike.
Those contemporaries are portrayed by a cast fewer in number than would be
ideal but harboring no shortage of talent and ability. There is a great deal
of doubling which can be confusing in this sprawling story which takes place
over nearly thirty years in Padua, Venice, Florence and Rome.
Among
those turning in a fine performance (or multiple fine performances) are
Lawrence Redmond, Valerie Leonard, Leo Erickson, and Conrad Feininger. Bette
Cassatt tries mightily to breathe life into the least well developed major
part in the play, that of Galileo’s daughter (yes, the same character as in
Dava Sobel’s marvelous 1999 best seller “Galileo’s Daughter”). Sixth grader
Peter Vance is notably effective in his professional debut, holding his own
on stage with van Griethuysen as a young student receiving some of the
master’s wisdom.
Helen
Q. Huang‘s parchment and brass set is striking upon first view, as you enter
the theater, but it soon becomes the unintrusive backdrop to the events of
the play even as it slides open and aside to signal changes in scene. It and
Michael Giannitti’s often glowing lighting emphasize that this is a play of
ideas and personalities even as they create the feeling of the period. No
special effects magic attempt to distract from the issues of the play and no
overdone images detract from the concentration on the ideas flowing from van
Griethuysen and colleagues in such abundance.
Written by Bertolt
Brecht. Translated by David Hare. Directed by David Salter. Design: Helen Q.
Huang (set and costumes) Michelle Elwyn (properties) Michael Giannitti
(lights) Peter Weitz (music) Gil Thompson (sound) Scott Berg
(photography) Rachael A. Homan (stage
manager). Cast: Bette Cassatt, George Tynan Crowley, Leo Erickson, Conrad
Feininger, Ted van Griethuysen, Don Kenefick, Valerie Leonard, Christopher
Luggiero, Rob McClure, Karl Miller, Karen Novack, Lawrence Redmond, Tony
Simione, Gary Sloan, Peter Vance, Scott Wichmann. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
September 3 – November 23, 2003
Topdog/Underdog |
Reviewed September 7
Running time 2 hours 30 minutes
t
Potomac Stages Pick |
A remarkable piece of theater making, the area premiere of last year’s
Pulitzer Prize winning drama feels like a slice of life. But, as any really
good work of fiction, it is so much more than just a realistic
representation of reality. The dramatic arc, the poetry of the language and
the vividness of the characterization concentrates mere reality into truth.
In this case, the truth is the waste of human potential in an imperfect
society. The clarity of the author’s view is amplified by the precision of
Joy Zinoman’s direction and the energy of two captivating performances as
black men who share more than just parents.
Storyline: Two down-on-their-luck brothers share a single room in a run-down
apartment house (toilet down the hall). One used to work the three card
monte con in which a mark is challenged to follow one card as the dealer
constantly shifts them around. But now he works in an arcade, made up in
whiteface as Abraham Lincoln so customers can assassinate him. The other
doesn’t even have that much of a job, living on what he can steel and what
he can dream.
Suzan-Lori Parks’ play is so deceptively simple in structure that it seems
to flow from point to point by a natural process. Nothing feels artificial
and no plot points seem mechanically set up. Instead, the audience learns
who these two brothers are bit by bit and piece by piece, picking up clues
from their conversations. Neither brother stops to explain anything, for
each knows the other’s story. Still, the essential information is laid out
in such clarity that there is absolutely no difficulty figuring out what is
going on at any point. Yes, there are surprises. Yes, there are unexpected
plot twists. But they don’t seem contrived and never feel like the
playwright is playing a game of one-upmanship.
Jahi
Kearse and Thomas W. Jones II create these two brothers in performances that
are intense and honest, combining the lyrical with the physical to get the
frustrations of the lives of these two brothers across in the most
dramatically direct way. The key is not so much that they make the
characters likeable but that they show the potential each has for being so
much more than they have been able to become. There is unfulfilled talent,
undeveloped intelligence and unrealized ambition in each. Although each has
touches of honesty and humor that take the edge off the ugliness of some
aspects of their lives, it is the unfulfilled potential that makes them
truly tragic.
Zinoman paces the action fluidly and draws work from her design team that
matches the performances of the two actors in being just slightly more real
than the real world. Russell Metheny’s set has walls and windows and doors
that look exactly like you would find in a run down rooming house but they
are slightly off kilter, leaning to the side, ready to collapse of the
accumulated weight of despair. Reggie Ray’s costumes also build on details
to be more than simply the kind of clothes these brothers would wear. The
duds one brother steals are brighter than bright while the costume of the
other for his Abraham Lincoln stint is threadbare and stained. Each is, as
are so many things about this production, just right to signal a host of
messages about the world of these characters. It is a remarkable piece of
theater making.
Written by Suzan-Lori
Parks. Directed by Joy Zinoman. Design: Russell Metheny (set) Reggie Ray
(costumes) Michelle Elwyn (properties) Michael Lincoln (lights) Neil
McFadden (sound) Carol Pratt (photography) Christine Nelson (stage manager). Cast: Jahi Kearse, Thomas
W. Jones II through October 26, Jeorge Bennett Watson thereafter.. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 6 – 29, 2003
Lackawanna Blues |
Reviewed June 8
Running time 1 hour 30 minutes
Price range $30 - $44
t
Potomac Stages Pick |
Some shows cast their spells slowly, taking their own sweet time to pull you
into their world. Others capture your attention and earn your affection
from the very start. (Some, of course, never do cast a spell or earn your
affection but that is another story entirely.) This extraordinary
performance does both, it casts its spell almost instantaneously and then
just gets farther and farther into your mind and heart for each of its
ninety minutes. It is the kind of show that makes a reviewer want to simply
say “Go see it, you’ll love it and you’ll be sorry if you miss it.” But, for
those who want more description and rationale before buying a ticket, here
are the facts:
Storyline: The storyteller creates a warm, humorous and human portrait of
the woman who raised him in the Great Lakes city of Lackawana, New York by creating vivid
portrayals of over twenty of the people whose lives she affected and letting
the audience see her through their eyes. At the start, the storyteller lets
you know he feels blessed to have known this woman. By the end you feel
blessed to have known her.
Ruben
Santiago-Hudson is an actor with a remarkable ability to connect with his
audience on a direct, personal level, especially in a work structured as
stories told by a storyteller. In other works, he can be tremendously
effective on the other side of the proscenium, removed from the audience by
that legendary “fourth wall” of theater. Indeed, he has the awards to prove
it - Tony, Obie, Outer Critic’s Circle, etc. In this work, he is in the same
room, in the same space as the audience. His storyteller is talking directly
to the audience and he even trades a few comments with the audience,
reacting to the audience reactions. But those digressions are always brief
for the story he is creating out of the stories he is telling is too
important and immediately draws him back into the magic.
Santiago-Hudson wrote the piece based on his own experiences growing up in
Rachel “Nanny” Crosby’s boarding house in Lackawana. The people he knew
there are the characters he uses to tell her story. The script is filled
with so many colorful details, so many telling observations, so many
defining moments that it comes as a surprise after the house lights come up
to realize that he never did give a physical description of “Nanny.” No,
there are physical descriptions of almost every other character --
descriptions that bring them indelibly to life. It is part of the genius of
his writing that he leaves it to your own imagination to fill in the details
of “Nanny.”
Sitting on the stage with Santigo-Hudson is blues guitarist Bill Sims, Jr.
who provides a soundtrack for the picture being created. Sims pays as much
attention to Santiago-Hudson as does everyone else in the room. It is as if
he was hearing these stories for the very first time himself and the sounds
that come from his guitar are the reaction of his heart to them. He helps
create this magical piece as does the design team and show crew. But all
eyes, all ears and all hearts are on the “Nanny” that is created in the
audience’s mind. She’s quite a woman!
Written and performed by
Ruben Santiago-Hudson accompanied by Bill Sims, Jr. Directed by Loretta
Greco. Design: Myung Hee Cho (set and costumes) Jim Vermeulen (lighting)
Michal Daniel (photography) Curtis V. Hodge (stage manager). |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
May 14 – June 22, 2003
A Class Act |
Reviewed May 18
Running time 2 hours 40 minutes
t Potomac Stages Pick |
Better than Broadway! This portrait/tribute to a man who felt passionately
about the art of musical theatre was a “must see” for aficionados for its
three month run on Broadway. But it couldn’t reach a wider audience that
would support a longer run. Here, in a brand new production, in a smaller
venue, with - lets face it - a stronger star, it is again a “must see.” But
this time for general theatergoers, not just those already enraptured by the
lore of the Broadway musical. In the bigger (1,125 seat) Ambassador Theatre
up north, the show was nice but hardly compelling. In the smaller (200 seat)
Studio Theatre here in northwest, the show reaches the audience at a more
human level. At the finale, after laughs and tunes aplenty, there were
people dabbing tears from their eyes, choking back a sob and really
identifying with the saga of the hero.
Storyline: Ed Kleban is best known for the lyrics he wrote for the
then-longest running show in Broadway history, A Chorus Line, but he
wanted more than anything to have a hit show with both his lyrics and his
music. He left many songs for which he had written both words and music when
he died of cancer in 1988. They have been cobbled together into a show
that tells his story - a show about the passion for creating art, the craft
of musical theater and his own peculiarities.
Part
of the reason this marvelous show is better than it was on Broadway is the
performance of Bobby Smith in the lead role of Ed Kleban. The part had been
played on Broadway by Lonny Price, a tremendously talented man
who also co-wrote the book and directed the show. Price made audiences
understand the passion Kleban had for his art, but Smith adds another
dimension, making the audience really care about the man before dealing with
his foibles or his fate - and the secret of any play’s ability to carry an
audience through a story is to get them to care about the protagonist before
putting him or her through whatever fortune has in store.
Another reason for the success of A Class Act here at Studio is that
it is a small intimate show that fits perfectly into a space that brings the
audience and the artists together. On Broadway, with a proscenium separating
the playing space from the audience, everything was one step removed.
Besides, Broadway shows today require spectacle and smashing moments. This
show was written to keep rolling pleasantly along while it builds its impact
through momentum and the cumulative impact of individually intriguing and/or
pleasing scenes. (The fact that the top ticket price was $75 while Studio
charges between $30 and $44 for a seat might have something to do with it as
well.)
Studio’s production offers a seven member cast in support of Bobby Smith
that is replete with individualistic flash - Leo Ericskson is smooth and
utterly convincing as Kleban’s teacher, Lehman Engel; Eric Sutton is
marvelous as both Kleban’s classmate and his A Chorus Line
collaborator, Marvin Hamlisch; and both Lauri Kraft and Roseanne Medina are
impressive as the two women in Kleban’s life. They are backed by a fine five
piece band led by George Fulginiti-Shakar from his keyboard. Bassist Matt
Murray is particularly good on Medina’s “Scintilating Sophie” as is Rita
Eggert’s flute work on “One More Beautiful Song.”
Book by Linda Kline and
Lonny Price. Music and lyrics by Edward Kleban. Directed by Serge Seiden.
Musical direction by George Fulginiti-Shakar. Choreography by Michael J.
Bobbitt. Design: Russell Metheny (set) Alex Jaeger (costumes) Michelle Elwyn
(properties) Michael Lincoln (lights) Gil Thompson (sound) Scott Suchman
(photography) Karen A. Storms
(stage manager). Cast Tony Capone, Cathy Carey, Leo Erickson, Lauri Kraft,
Roseanne Medina, Bobby Smith, Eric Sutton, Mia Whang. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
March 26 – May 25, 2003
The Play About the Baby |
Reviewed March 30
Running time 1 hour 50 minutes |
Edward Albee writes things
that capture the imagination in language that challenges the brain as well
as stimulating the ear. At his best he can be extremely theatrical and
highly realistic simultaneously. But any play that sets up a strange
conundrum requires a smashing resolution to be truly satisfying. He found
that smashing resolution for his latest, The Goat. But he failed to
find it for this, the play he wrote before The Goat. Instead, he ends
on ambiguity. Ambiguity isn’t a bad thing in the right play. But when you
ask the audience to spend nearly two hours contemplating “just what is going
on here?” you need to answer the question or at least let the audience
answer it for themselves.
Storyline: Boy and Girl
are seen to be ecstatically happy at the birth of their first child when
their seemingly idyllic world is invaded by Man and Woman who try to make
them question weather they actually have a baby at all. As the second act
begins, Man delivers the telling line “let’s see if they will let us take
the baby.”
Man
here is a fabulously flexible performance by Philip Goodwin who takes a
benign and even elegant appearance and adds demonic, sadistic and downright
evil touches to keep everyone off balance, on stage and off. Everyone in the
four member cast does a great deal with what is in the script but Mr.
Goodwin adds so much more with movements, glances, shrugs and little
tripping steps.
Nancy
Robinette is somehow less disturbing but no less entertainingly funny as
Woman. It can’t be easy to play your scene when your colleagues are running
around naked. Indeed, Robinette as Woman turns directly to the audience to
ask if, in fact, Boy and Girl are racing around in the all-together. Well,
they are some of the time. At other times, they play scenes wrapped in a
sheet – a single sheet that they share. Most of the time, however, Kosha
Engler and Matt Stinton are clothed. Whether clothed or not they are
attractive, interesting and believable characters – at least until the
ambiguity gets out of hand.
Russell Metheny‘s set is simplicity itself. The stage seems bare. But look
closer. There’s a sort of shadow proscenium made of clear corrugated plastic
set out from a back wall made of the same material. The thrust stage is
rimmed by tiny footlights. It isn’t clear if all the world is a stage, but
all this world certainly is. The only furnishings are four chairs: two adult
size and two child size as Man and Woman take on Boy and Girl in a fight of
wits and wills over “The Baby.”
Written by Edward Albee.
Directed by Joy Zinoman. Design: Russell Metheny (set) Helen Q. Huang
(costumes) Michelle Elwyn (properties) Michael Giannitti (lights) Gil
Thompson (sound) Carol Pratt (photography) Christine Fisichella (stage
manager). Cast Philip Goodwin, Nancy Robinette, Kosha Engler, Matt Stinton.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
January 1 – February 16, 2003
Runaway Home |
Reviewed January 5
Running time 2 hours 40 minutes
t
Potomac Stages Pick |
|
What a marvelous way to begin the year - a new play by a very talented
playwright given an excellent staging with a quality cast. This is the world
premiere of the latest work by Javon Johnson who wrote last season’s well
received Hambone. Our review
of that show said it stimulated “a sense of theatrically induced
exhilaration.” So does this one, although the resolution of the conflicts
set up over two and a half hours of fascinating exposition is so troubling
that attendees who exit loving the show may modify their judgment a bit in a
post-show discussions.
Storyline: In South
Carolina in 1981, a thirty-six year old single mother of five is tempted by
the return of the love of her life who deserted her during her pregnancy
with their son, her oldest child. That child is now on the edge of adulthood
and dabbling in drug dealing, while each or her other children have problems
of their own.
Just as with Hambone,
Johnson’s facility with dialogue and his ability to create believable (but
infuriatingly flawed) flesh-and-blood characters are the basis for drawing
the audience into emotional attachments and then forcing wrenching
encounters with reality. The key to this, his ninth professionally staged
play, is the fact that the single mother grew up but didn’t mature. She’s a
woman-child watching her children become men and women without becoming real
adults. What she fears for them is a repeat of her own failures. She copes
with economic survival but hasn’t yet mastered emotional survival.
Rosalyn Colemen is superb
as the single mom, still pretty, pert and sexy but weighed down to the point
of fatigue by her efforts to live up to her own expectations of an adult
parent. She’s surrounded by terrific performers as each of her children as
well as the men in her life. Three of the children have grown into
multifaceted characters in late adolescence and each is given life by actors
who capture those facets. The two younger ones have yet to grow to the stage
of complexity that seems to come with puberty. Eleven year old Christopher
Gallant II and six year old Javier D. Brown perform these roles with skill.
The men in the play are as
complex as Coleman’s character. Each adds to her crisis in a different way.
Wayne W. Pretlow is fascinating to watch as her brother who responds to the
needs of her family while Cleo Reginald Pizano and Frederick Strother
compete for her favor. The final resolution to her quandary will linger in
the mind of many.
Written by Javon
Johnson. Directed by Reggie Life. Design: Daniel L. Conway (set) Reggie Ray
(costumes) Michelle Elwyn (properties) Michael Giannitti (lights) Gil
Thompson (sound) David Maddox (composer). Cast: Rosalyn Colemen, Wayne W.
Pretlow, Cleo Reginald Pizano, Frederick Strother, Sekou Laidlow,
Christopher Gallant II, Javier D. Brown, Edwina Findley, Brandon J. Price,
Ashley Blaine Featherson, |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 6, 2002 – January 5, 2003
The Shape of Things |
Reviewed November 10, 2002
Running time 2 hours 30 minutes
Price Range $30 - $44 |
Playwright Neal LaBute, known for plays that examine disturbing issues,
takes on a set of questions often debated in the world of the arts but
rarely resolved. As a recurring theme of this well acted and well staged
four-person play puts it "all art is subjective" – so it seems the
playwright is not concerned by the fact that the issues remain unresolved at
the end of yet another airing. Instead, he seems satisfied that they have
been raised for endless after-theater discussions of issues like "What is
art?" "What is the role of an artist?" and, "How much license does an artist
have for actions taken in pursuit of art?"
Storyline: In the hands of a girl who pays him more attention than any
girl ever did, a nerd is transformed into a hunk to the wonder of his former
roommate and the former roommate’s fiancé, the girl he never had the courage
to ask for a date.
Holly Twyford has the most difficult task of the four in this cast for
her character is engaged in a deception so her performance must work on two
levels. She is as perky and cute as any college boy’s dream as she draws the
nerd of a college boy, Scott Barrow, deeper and deeper into what he believes
is a life-transforming makeover. But she has to hold back just enough to
pull off the twist ending where playwright LaBute reveals the issues he is
really raising. She nearly pulls it off. Her transformation for the final
two scenes works well enough to carry you through to the end – but may not
survive the post-theater discussions over coffee or drinks.
Barrow may have had a less daunting challenge, for his transformation in
LaBute’s script is both better motivated and better modulated. But once he
seems to have captured the role, he must enact the most awkwardly staged
denouement in recent memory. This is not a criticism of director Will
Pomerantz, for the awkwardness is a feature of LaBute’s concept for the
scene. But it is difficult to watch Barrow try to pull it off. It is
supposed to be painful for the character but it turns out to be painful for
any in the audience who can empathize with, and relate to, the character.
Not everyone gets a clear view of this for Barrow sits in the audience, out
of sight of some including those in the front center section.
Still, Barrow’s work is notable as is the work of the Justin C. Krauss
and Margot White as the roommate and fiancé. Also notable is the work of the
scenic designer Debra Booth who handles the demands of ten different locales
with smooth transitions and a remarkably unified look.
Written by Neal LaBute. Directed by Will Pomerantz. Design: Debra
Booth (set) Devon Painter (costumes) Michael Giannitti (lights) Neil
McFadden (sound). Cast: Holly Twyford, Scott Barrow, Margot White, Justin G.
Krauss. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
September 11 – November
17, 2002
Privates on Parade |
Reviewed September 19
Running time 2 hours 55 minutes
Price range $25 - $44.25 |
Sometimes a compilation of many different types of material all in one
package can intrigue a wider audience than would be attracted to a show in
any one of the types. At other times it works the other way around with the
dissimilar elements working against each other. This is an example of the
later, at least in the hands of director Joy Zinoman, who tries her darndest
to reconcile the differences but ends up with something that seems a
terribly earnest attempt at material that needed a much lighter hand.
Storyline: A young, innocent and virginal British soldier is assigned to a
unit in Southeast Asia in 1948, during the British "Maylay Emergency"
operation against communist insurgents in the jungles around Singapore and
Kuala Lumpur. The unit is an entertain-the-troops caravan, most of whom go
for the English Music Hall kind of mixture of sketch humor and songs usually
referred to as "ditties." At opposite extremes, however, are the
straight-arrow commanding officer who is proud of he fact that he hasn’t
seen a show "since, what, 1935?" and turns a blind eye on the rampant
homosexuality in the ranks and the aging drag queen who is the star of the
show.
The elements here include the kind of sketch comedy that Benny Hill made
famous with broad gags usually involving bodily functions usually confined
to the bedroom or the bathroom, British music hall songs for a chorus of
four or five, aging drag queen impersonations, pompous political polemics,
two or three love stories involving heterosexual, homosexual and paternal
affection and brief anti-war scenes. Excesses abound. Scenes can jump in
quick-cut fashion from the Benny Hill material featuring the expected
gratuitous male nudity (both frontal and "rear-al") to a battle scene of
surprising realism with the screams and groans of the writhing wounded all
but drowning out the sound of gunfire.
A superb cast tries to make sense of this Malaysian mélange. Floyd King
is nothing short of marvelous as the star of the troupe. Half of his time on
stage is in scenes from the show the troupe is putting on and here he sports
costumes (designed with wicked wit by Helen Q. Whang) that could have come
from the closets of everyone from Carmen Miranda to Noel Coward. King makes
the most of each of these. His appearance in a Marlene Dietrich sketch is
priceless. J. Fred Schiffman is almost as strong in his
stiff-upper-everything performance as the unit commander who wants more than
anything to take his "troops" into battle against the yellow communist
hordes.
This is not billed as a musical, it is "a play with songs," but the
musical performances are disappointing nonetheless. Perhaps Musical Director
John Kalbfleisch wanted to have the songs, most of which are elements of the
show the soldiers are putting on, seem as amateurish as the real thing would
have been. But some of his characteristic precision could have highlighted
the characters failings wittily by contrasting them with more solid backing
both vocal and instrumental. With the likes of Will Gartshore in the cast
and Rita Eggert in the band, he certainly had the tools to do this. But it
doesn’t seem to have been in Zinoman’s concept for the show.
Written by Peter Nichols. Music by Denis King. Directed by Joy Zinoman.
Music direction by John Kalbfleisch. Choreography by Robert Biedermann.
Design: Debra Booth (set) Helen Q. Huang (costumes) Michael Lincoln (lights)
Gil Thompson (sound) Michelle Elwyn (properties). Cast: Floyd King, J. Fred
Shiffman, Jon Cohn, Michael Tolaydo, David Bryan Jackson, Will Gartshore,
Jim Ferris, Tom Gualtieri, Sunita Param, Leonard Wu, Franklin Dam. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 14 – July 13, 2002
Lypsinka: The Boxed Set
|
Reviewed June 16
Running time 1 hour 10 minutes |
An impressive display of the skill of lip
synching to pre-recorded material is matched by an impressively convincing
female impersonation act in what feels like a slightly extended club act. It
generates its own excitement through quick pacing, marvelous sound editing
and a lighting design as energetic as the performance. But going on for
about a third longer than the material can support, it begins to pale too
soon and some of the bits late in the act seem mere repetition. As the last
of Studio’s "Special Event" programming for the season, it is priced fairly
steeply for a short show, with tickets between $23.50 and $43.50 depending
on location and night.Storyline: John Epperson appears as the female
character "Lypsinka" in a live performance of the pre-recorded collection of
songs, skits and eminently quotable clips that many would easily recognize
either by celebrity or source. From Betty Davis to Marlene Dietrich to Doris
Day and from Joan Crawford to Elizabeth Taylor to Gloria Swanson, all the
icons are here. From "Sunset Boulevard" to "Vertigo" all the now-camp movies
are dredged up again, and from Bells are Ringing to Little Me
all the musical references are brought out.
The level of skill exhibited by Mr. Epperson in his 1950’s perfect party
dress, polished nails, sculpted hair do and high heels is undeniably
impressive. (When was the last time you noticed credits not only for costume
but for jewelry?) As a drag performer, he is rock solid and he raises lip
synching to a new level. It isn’t just the lips that synchronize with the
singing, sighing, speaking and all manner of vocal expression. His entire
body appears to be the source of the sounds that are actually emanating from
a recording played through the theater’s speaker system at notably high
levels of volume. Every inhalation is matched by an expanding chest. Even
his adam’s apple quivers when the sound track is "belting."
That sound track may actually be the most impressive accomplishment of
the evening. In the 70 or 75 minutes (if you count the completely
choreographed curtain call) there must be two hundred different clips and
segments. Some bear the unmistakable imprint of older movie sound tracks.
Others come across as takes from live appearances complete with audience
reaction. Still others sound like studio recording sessions. There are
segments without background music, segments with blaring accompanying big
bands and segments with lush, full studio orchestras. Yet they balance
perfectly.
The set by Jim Boutin looks exactly right as a small night club stage.
Most of the surfaces are white so they pick up Mark T. Simpson’s lighting
effects. Epperson uses practically every square inch of the area but his
funniest bits come as he moves between three spotlights assuming a different
persona in each circle of light for just a moment.
Written and performed by John Epperson. Directed by Kevin Malony.
Design: Jim Boutin (set) Bryant Hoven (costumes) Robert Sorrell (Jewelry)
Mark T. Simpson (lights) John Epperson (soundtrack). |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
May 15 –
July 14, 2002
Lobby Hero
|
Reviewed May 26
Running time 2 hours 45 minutes
t
Potomac Stages Pick |
What a difference six years seems to make! Kenneth Lonergan wrote this play
just six years after his 1996 effort This Is Our Youth which
displayed such rich dialogue writing and well constructed individual
characters but seemed structurally strained. Lobby Hero, on the other
hand, is marked by deft plotting and solid structure while also treating the
audience to dialogue delights delivered by intriguing characters. Thanks to
Studio and Studio SecondStage, it is possible to see both these plays at the
same time and to witness the growth of a significant playwright. But whether
you see the earlier effort or not, Potomac Stages urges you not to miss
Lobby Hero, an entertaining and engrossing portrait of life in the
midlevel quagmire of modern American urban environs.Storyline: The
guard in the lobby of a Manhattan apartment building engages his supervisor
in a conversation which leads to the revelation of the supervisor’s role in
providing a false alibi to save his brother from prosecution for a horrible
crime. Should he reveal the truth to the authorities? His quandary is
complicated by his admiration for his supervisor, his attraction to a young
female rookie cop and his confrontation with her partner.
Just four characters: but what well-constructed, marvelously-developed
ones. Each is revealed in small increments. Bits and pieces of
character-revealing detail emerge from natural-sounding conversations – the
kind of conversations people have in the long hours of midnight shifts where
prolonging the discussion means filling up empty time and anything seems a
reasonable subject for exploration. None of the characters turns out to be
what they first appear, but the evolution of the audience’s understanding of
their individual traits is managed with transparent skill.
Studio has brought Jason Schuchman down from Boston to repeat his
award-winning performance as the guard. He inhabits the part the way an
actor who has played a particular role many, many times does but his
performance feels fresh as if he’s discovering new depths in the character
this very evening. The play is not a star piece, however. It is an ensemble
piece and the other three actors join him in creating a satisfying whole.
Tina Frantz’s portrayal of the rookie cop gets deeper and richer as the
evening progresses and Daniel Cantor’s bluster as her partner works very
well. Clark Jackson gets some of the depth of the supervisor’s role across
but leaves the impression that there is more there to mine.
As is so often the case at Studio, the physical production is an
evocation of an environment so solid as to appear sliced from the outside
world and dragged inside. This lobby is like every security-guarded, pricy
high rise apartment building’s lobby, complete down to the candy wrappers on
the floor, the fed-ex packages awaiting pick-up and the "all visitors must
sign in" sign next to the reception desk. Even the cardboard coffee cup
appears to be one of those you get in all-night neighborhood markets in New
York. The same blue cups show up over in SecondStage’s mounting of This
Is Our Youth. I wonder which properties mistress, Youth’s Diane
Graves or Hero’s Michelle Elwyn brought them down from New York City
or tracked them down locally. Props, lights, costumes, sounds all contribute
to a feeling of reality. It is a feeling that matches the work of playwright
Lonergan.
Written by Kenneth Lonergan. Directed by J.R. Sullivan. Design: Daniel
Conway (set) Reggie Ray (costumes) Michelle Elwyn (properties) Michael
Philippi (lights) Neil McFadden (sound). Cast: Jason Schuchman, Tina Frantz,
Daniel Cantor, Clark Jackson. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
March 20 –
April 28, 2002
Prometheus |
Reviewed March 24
Running time 2 hours 5 minutes
t
Potomac Stages Pick |
It is a rare pleasure to see Aeschylus’
twenty-five-hundred-year-old tragedy performed with clarity and style. It is
an unprecedented pleasure to have it joined with an equally clear and
stylish projection of where that story was leading. After all, Prometheus
Bound was but one of three plays in the trilogy Aeschylus wrote on the
already ancient legend of the god who gave fire to humankind. But the other
two plays have not survived. Filling in the blanks is a fascinating game
that Studio Theatre pursues with flair. Add to that a typically enjoyable
turn by Ted van Griethuysen who gets to play Zeus, and you have a fine
evening of theater.Storyline: In the first act the god Prometheus is
condemned to an eternity chained to the rock at the end of the world in
punishment for having violated Zeus’ commandment that none of the gods
should aid the newly created human race. This is the classic Greek tragedy
of Aeschylus in a new and streamlined adaptation by contemporary author
Sophy Burnham. In the second act, which is her creation, Prometheus and Zeus
square off in a debate over the meaning of the punishment, the role of the
gods and the nature of human existence.
This is a bifurcated production. The first half is not an exact
replication of ancient theater. Rather, it is a set up for the more modern
second half. But there are pleasures aplenty in that first half. There is a
classic Greek chorus deployed by director Joy Zinnoman (assisted by
"movement consultant" Meade Andrews) in a visual pattern that matches the
vocal patterns of Deborah Wicks LaPuma’s musical score. There is Russell
Metheny’s spare setting of stone steps surrounding the enchainment spot
where William M. Hulings’s Prometheus strains against his bonds (the set
construction crew must have worked miracles to create a structure that could
withstand his pullings and tuggings). There is Jim Zadar’s troubled god of
the forge, Timmy Ray James’ stylish god of power, Leo Erickson’s
stilt-walking/cliché spouting god of – well, we could go on and on about
which god is which.
After a brief intermission, Burnham’s view of what happened later unfolds
on a modernized version of the set by actors in more modern garb delivering
lines with a distinctly more modern informality. It is now millennia later
and Prometheus’ punishment has come to an end. Ted van Griethuysen in
sandals and a robe is Zeuss in civilian garb (he explains to Hulings’
Prometheus that his normal appearance is so grand he wouldn’t be able to
stand it). The two of them take each other on in an intellectual battle of
wills over which one’s approach to humankind is the better – Prometheus’
gifts of knowledge including the famous fire or Zeus’ gifts of the
opportunity to discover truths on their own. Written as it has been in the
modern time, this act contains some patently politically correct
observations on such issues as pollution and abortion but it also sets out a
fascinating comparison between two views of the role of the gods which act
as surrogates for competing concepts of responsibility of many kinds, from
parental to governmental. Hulings, who was all strength and struggle when
chained, turns argumentative in this act. Van Griethuysen is down-to-earth
as a god can be, showing a deeper sense of the duty of a deity and the
pairing of parental pride and pain over the progress as well as the failings
of humans.
Adapted from Aeschylus by Sophy Burnham. Directed by Joy Zinoman.
Original musical score by Deborah Wicks LaPuma. Design: Russell Metheny
(set) Helen Q. Huang (costumes) Michael Lincoln (lights) Neil McFadden
(sound.) Cast: William M. Hulings, Ted van Griethuysen, Timmy Ray James,
James Zidar, Maurice Allain, Leo Erickson, Sarah Marshall, Tom Story, Peter
Cassidy and a chorus of the 16 daughters of Ocean. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
January 2 – March 3, 2002
Hambone |
Reviewed January 6
Running time 2 hours 35 minutes |
Hambone is so much a Studio Theatre experience that it almost feels like
déjà vu, yet it features newcomers who fit right in. Yes, the cast includes
Doug Brown, back where he has appeared many times, and Timothy Rice is
making his eleventh Studio appearance, but three of the five member cast are
new to Studio. Yes, it is directed by Regge Life who directed Jitney
here last year, but that was only his first Studio play. It even has a set by
the first new set designer to work at Studio in seventeen years. Still, the
audience exits with the same sense of theatrically induced exhilaration as
they did following such Studio experiences as Jitney last season and
Master Harold and the Boys the season before that.Storyline: In
1988, the owner of a sandwich shop in Anderson, South Carolina comes to
grips with his own history and that of the youth he raised when the unusual
event of a white man entering the shop for a cup of coffee sets off a chain
of reactions none of them could predict.
Playwright Javon Johnson is frequently referred to as a protégé of August
Wilson whose Jitney was so powerfully staged by Life last year. There
are similarities in plotting and in theme and in the dramatic command of
street language, but Hambone should be seen because of its strengths,
not because of its linkage to Wilson. Johnson is a playwright who clearly
likes people. His characters all have human weaknesses but they all are
treated with a respectful affection. This two-act play has seven scenes,
each a well constructed theatrical piece that could stand alone as a short
one-act play. Each has its own "hook" and each is fascinating on its own
terms. But they link together as part of a linear narrative, building a
momentum that drives satisfyingly to a powerful climax.
A Potomac Region debut of note is Jamahl Marsh’s portrayal of the young
man raised by the proprietor of Bishop’s Sandwich Shop. His transition from
innocent youth through disillusionment to a promising young adult is a
fascinating journey to witness. While each of the characters in the play
undergo life-changing moments, Marsh actually changes in stages throughout
the performance, becoming a very different person by the end than the one he
was at the start. Doug Brown, as the shop’s proprietor, is fascinating to
watch as well. But he builds toward a climax of his own which, at least on
opening night, was weakened by a vocal hoarseness.
Debra Booth’s ultra-realistic set is a marvel. At first it appears to be
a clever duplication of a sandwich shop of the period with real napkin
holders, sugar jars, coffee makers and hot sauce bottles. Booth and
properties designer Michelle Elwyn extend their attention to details such as
laminated menus actually reading "Bishop’s Sandwich Shop," a Jesse Jackson
for President bumper sticker and an Anderson South Carolina newspaper in the
rack (although there was an Koons Arlington Toyota add on the second shelf).
But, as the play proceeds it becomes clear that the set is much more than a
mere replication. With a wrap-around audience, it manages to act as a lens
to focus attention to one area of the shop even as individual events break
out from the center. Two exteriors built out to the wings make the confined
space of the shop part of a larger world. It is beautifully lit by Michael
Giannitti.
Written by Javon Johnson. Directed by Regge Life. Design: Debra Booth
(set) Michael Giannitti (lights) Reggie Ray (costumes) Gil Thompson (sound)
Michelle Elwyn (properties.) Cast: Doug Brown, David Toney, Jamahl Marsh,
Luis A. Laporte, Jr, Timothy Rice. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 14 – December 30, 2001
A New Brain |
Reviewed November 18
Running time 1 hour 40 minutes |
Simply put, this is one of the highlights of the 2001 theater year. The
opportunity to witness a cast this good performing a work this strong in a
production this fine doesn’t come along very often – so get your tickets
before it is too late!Storyline: When show-music writer William Finn
survived treatment for a potentially fatal brain abnormality, he wrote a
musical about a show-music writer who survived treatment for a potentially
fatal brain abnormality. With abundant good humor the story which could have
been about death becomes a positively joyful life-affirming testament with
half a dozen intriguing characters.
Tony Award winner Michael Rupert’s relocation from New York to Washington
pays off handsomely not only for him (he says he can walk to work now from
his 16th street apartment) but for audiences in the Potomac
Region. He is known for his work in other musicals by William Finn and was
nominated for a second Tony Award for the role of Marvin in Finn’s
Falsettos. His performance here is not to be missed.
And what a supporting cast! Will Gartshore, who was wonderful in Floyd
Collins and fabulous in Grand Hotel is better in A New Brain.
Judy Simmons, who has made something of a career of Sondheim’s "Ladies Who
Lunch" can now substitute "The Music Still Plays On" as her big number. This
production has Andrea Frierson-Toney tearing up the hall with "Change" and
Scott Leonard Fortune doing the same with "Eating Myself Up Alive." Buzz
Mauro even manages to give the part of a heartless TV kids-show host a hint
of decency (as well as executing some clever choreographic touches with his
feet suggestive of the frog his character plays on TV.)
Finn’s play, written with James Lapine who co-wrote Falsettos with
him and Into the Woods and Passion with Stephen Sondheim, is
almost non-stop singing with only a few lines of dialogue here and there.
Thirty-three songs in ninety-three minutes, every one of them involving
inventive lyrics and strong melodies with rich harmonies, tell the story in
a clear, fluid set of scenes. A four-piece band using two keyboards gives
solid support. Just as the score is sparkling, so is the visual impact of the
show: A clean modern set, sharp colorful costumes and bright lighting create
a world the songwriter values as he faces his own mortality.
Music and lyrics: William Finn. Book: James Lapine and William Finn.
Direction: Serge Seiden. Choreography: Michael J. Bobbitt. Orchestrations
are uncredited but sound very much like those of Michael Starobin who did
the originals. Vocal arrangements: Jason Robert Brown. Music Direction: Jay
Crowder with Alex Tang, George Hummel and Mac Dinitz in the band. Design:
Daniel Conway (set) Michael Giannitti (lights) Devon Painter (Costumes)
Maureen M. Tobin (sound.) Cast: Michael Rupert, Will Gartshore, Andrea
Frierson-Toney, Judy Simmons, Scott Leonard Fortune, Buzz Mauro, Mary Jayne
Raleigh, Kristy Glass, Eric Lee Johnson, Duncan Hood. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
September 19 - November 11, 2001
Far East |
Reviewed September 28 |
A.R. Gurney’s intimate semi-auto-biographical
play benefits immensely from the substantial feel of Joy Zinoman’s
production and the appropriateness of the decor of the Milton theater
upstairs at Studio. The room is absolutely perfect for a play set in the
American enclave post Korean War Japan. The theater’s face-mask lamps look
like they were designed for this piece
Storyline: In 1954 a young Navy officer reports for duty to the American
Naval Base at Yokosuka, Japan. The officer revels at the opportunity to
expand his world while his commanding officer, and his commanding officer’s
wife, want to protect him from foreign intrigues and corruptions. This isn’t
so much a clash of western and eastern cultures as a clash between the
adventurousness and openness of youth and the caution and security
consciousness of maturity.
Among the principals, the most satisfying performance comes from Rick
Foucheux as the commanding officer. This is his Studio Theatre debut after
his Helen Hayes Award performance in “Edmond” at Source where he is a
resident artist.
The most memorable performance, however, comes from Mia Whang who is a
graduate of Studio’s Acting Conservatory making her mainstage debut. She is
the “Reader” who sits through the entire production on a raised platform,
contributing the lines of all the secondary characters using only variations
in vocal mannerisms to distinguish between them.
Gurney’s use of the concept of the “Reader” is the very theatrical ploy he
uses to keep this western-man-meets-east plot from seeming like a spin off
of either “Tea House of the August Moon” “Sayonara” “Miss Saigon” or “Madam
Butterfly.” It works and that makes for a most engaging evening of theater. |
| |
|