Washington Shakespeare
Company - ARCHIVE
Click here to go to this
theater's main page |
|
|
Lulu
November 12 –
December 13, 2009
Thursday – Saturday at 8 pm
Saturday – Sunday at 2 pm
Reviewed November
17 by
David Siegel |
A camp
approach to what was ground breaking a century ago
Running Time: 2:25 – one intermission
Adult Situations including full male nudity
Tickets $25 - $35
|
|
A deliberate evening in the camp style, or perhaps self-parody might be a
better description as this production sniffs about lives focused on
depravity and the supposedly erotic. With men as dandies and women as the
owners of the source of sexuality, this is a production that depicts
fetishes and sexual release as uninvolved cold solo experience rather than
through heated mutual connections and seductions. Lulu playwright Frank Wedekind (1864-1918) may be better known as the author of what became the
musicalized
Spring Awakening which played the Kennedy Center's Eisenhower
Theater earlier this year. Director Christopher Henley has taken an arch
melodramatic approach with an apparent “don’t take this too seriously”
outlook. For the most part his cast uses artificial mannerism along with a
cadence aiming for witty delivery and studied body gestures. The key
ingredient in this overwrought production lies heavily on the slender
shoulders of Sara Barker; the “bad girl” Lulu. It is the reactions to her
that drives the production, as well as her ability to seem uninhibited and
impulsive while at the same time innocent. She is the maypole around which
others cavort; begging for her attention to meet their needs. Submissive one
moment and powerfully dominate the next, she is an unmarked canvas to which
others apply their brush strokes. Whether it’s her father, multiple
husbands, lesbian lover, or the last brute in her life, she is a mannequin;
“a nude with clothes on.” For your reviewer, the blood did not surge, nor
any trembles felt. With all its travails, Lulu, so boundary-breaking a
century ago, seems a lukewarm affair. Perhaps the only way to engage Lulu is
in a camp sensibility after all.
Storyline: The decline and fall of a young
woman possessed of a fatal combination of sexuality and innocence. She
passes from Germany to Paris to Jack The Ripper’s London on her way to her
ultimate end.
German playwright Frank Wedekind’s Lulu
may be recognized when associated with Pandora’s Box (1929) a German
silent film starring Louise Brooks. Lulu is based upon Wedekind’s two
Lulu plays - Earth Spirit (1895) and Pandora’s Box
(1904) - which are noted for their un-disguised descriptions of sexuality.
The script in this adaptation by Nicholas Wright (b 1940) was first produced
in London in 2001. It certainly has its share of spicey one-liners; “You were
taught depravity” and “You could be anybody’s degradation.” But those verbal
slaps in the face do not resound into the audience. Director Henley wrote in
his program notes that Lulu “tells a socio-psychological epic tale
with the rhythms of farce and features a femme fatale character…”
Your reviewer suggests that “epic” sucks any fun out of the theatrical
style Henley has imposed. His artistic touches are ones with oodles of
artifice and exaggeration. He even has the dead observe the happenings
seated on a couch along the periphery of the set as if gazing at an exotic
dancer from behind a glass partition for their continued solitary enjoyment.
The company surrounding
Barker brings in several who give life to their character’s particular
fetish. Jay Hardee as Husband #4, and son of an earlier Husband, is the ever
flamboyant caricature of a fey bi-sexual lad who dies in a most dramatic
manner. Karin Rosnizeck is a tall, deep voiced, hollow-cheeked woman without
use for men even as objects. She performs a slithering crawl about the floor
begging Barker to “trample me.” There are Frank Britton as a duplicitous
Marquis who wants to sell Barker into prostitution, and Allan Jirikowic and
Angel Torres as earlier husbands who plant their own older man dreams upon
the much younger Barker. James Finley gets the opportunity to strut as a
naive, somewhat virginal in outlook younger husband who takes his own life.
As a totally different character, Finley returns to bring the final curtain
down on the evening with his firm, ripped flesh fully visible.
The cavernous Clark Street
Playhouse has a bit of applied deterioration in trompe-l’oeil. This
includes a checker-board floor, walls with columns and open lattice without
plaster applied. The objects that fill the set are minimal. including
couches and chairs; they are schlepped in-and-out between scenes. Over
shadowing the proceedings is a large painting of Barker as she is first seen
in a demure outfit of white satin, black accents and several large black
buttons. There are high up scrims to silhouette Barker changing clothes,
giving an appearance that she is nude and out of reach. For many of the
males, make-up is jauntily applied bright white with panda dark eyes and lips
covered with blood red lipstick. The women beyond Barker are in tuxedos or
black evening dresses. As for Barker, she finds herself in harem outfits,
high society cocktail pieces or rags as her world turns upside down.
Pre-show music includes titles such as “These Foolish Things,” “Who’s Afraid
of the Big Bad Wolf” and “Singing in the Rain.”
Written by Frank Wedekind. Adapted by
Nicholas Wright. Translated by Wes Williams. Directed by Christopher Henley.
Design: Eric Grims (set) Greg Stevens (costumes)Marianne Meadows (lights)
David Crandall (sound) Casey Kaleba (fight direction) C. Stanley
(photography) Sarah Kamins (stage manager). Cast: Sara Barker, Frank
Britton, Tony Bullock, Zoe Cowan, Kim Curtis, S. Lewis Feemster, James
Finley, Jay Hardee, Tricia Homer, Allan Jirikowic, Jack Miggins, Barbara
Papendorp, Karin Rosnizeck, Julie Roundtree and Angel Torres. |
|
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
|
Camille
August 27 – September 27, 2009
Thursday – Saturday at 8 pm
Saturday – Sunday at 2 pm
Reviewed September 1 by
Brad Hathaway |
A classic
drag version of a Victorian era tragedy
Running time 2:20
Adult themes
Tickets $25 - $35
Click here to buy the script
|
A drag show with
lip-synching, outrageous puns and knowing self-depreciatory gags which is
subtitled “A Tearjerker”? Yes. This self-described “Travesty of La Dame aux
Camélas” is, in fact, a touching re-mounting of the tragic story of a
prostitute and her love affair with a gentleman not wealthy enough to ride
above society’s disapproval of his involvement with a (gasp!) woman of her
type. The original was a novel by the younger Alexandre Dumas (son of the
better known Alexandre Dumas who penned The Count of Monte Cristo and
The Three Musketeers). The novel became a hugely successful play, a
series of successful movies and even an opera. Here it is again. This time,
as an exercise in the excesses endemic to drag shows crafted by the master
of that form, Charles Ludlam, the founder of the famed Ridiculous Theatrical
Company. This revival, under Christopher Henley’s direction with a fine
performance by Jay Hardee in the title role, goes for the “tear” as well as
the laughs and the result is a unique if not entirely satisfying experience.
A key feature of the production is the high-camp lip-synching to recorded
songs by such strong personalities as Judy Garland and Elton John. Frank
Britton is particularly effective delivering Lena Horne’s “Stormy Weather,”
but at least at the beginning of the run, most of the performers could use
more rehearsal time to match the mouthing of these songs.Storyline: Marguerite Gautier lives off the money of her lovers, to the tune
of over a hundred thousand francs a year. When an admirer who can’t come
close to such wealth stimulates her affection through the sincerity of his
devotion, she admits him to her circle but the bond becomes too strong.
Dying of tuberculosis and implored by the young man’s father to break it off
before the relationship ruins his son’s reputation and any chance he has of
a successful career, she denies her love. He reacts bitterly, trying to
match hurt for hurt but becomes aware of her illness and manages to overcome
her resistance one last time.
Dumas adapted his 1848
novel (“The Lady of the Camilias” in English) for the stage where it seemed
to take on a life of its own because the title role was so very delicious
for an actress with the stature and stamina to make great tragedy work.
Sarah Bernhardt brought it to Broadway at least three times and was one of
the first actresses to play the role again on film. Giuseppe Verdi composed
the operatic version, La Traviata, in 1853 when it flopped. It caught
on, however, after a few revisions and has become one of the best known
works of the grand opera canon. In 1973, Ludlum came up with this
self-confessed “travesty” which uses the over-the-top aspects of the story
as a launching point for excess but which retains the essence of tragedy
that can engender a sob or two along the way. In his version, he played the
lady himself – in high drag, of course.
Hardee in drag is not a new
sight for Washington Shakespeare Company audiences. His work as one of the
adolescent girls in The Children’s Hour here was exceptionally
convincing and devoid of artifice. With a Ludlam part, artifice re-enters
the equation but not to the play's detriment. Playing without excess – well,
with a comparative minimum of excess – as the young man who falls for
Camille is James Finley. Their more touching dramatic scenes are nicely
backed by 1930s movie-type underscoring but the first act sentimental scenes
out-sentiment the second act's final tearjerker. John C. Bailey is notable
as both Camille’s maid and her young man’s father.
Andrew Berry’s elegantly
simple seeming set design relies on a semi-transparent screen that catches
both light patterns and the shadows of actors cavorting in ways that
underline or emphasize some key dialogue delivered before it. Sliding panels
accomplish changes in locale such as Paris, identified by the Eiffel Tower,
or the French countryside. Full use of the floor before the stage adds to
the sense of depth of the production and brings some of the drag foolishness
closer to the audience. Henley’s effective blocking and judicious use of
doubling makes the production appear to have a larger cast than it does. It
seems a bit surprising when the curtain call is taken by just nine
performers.
Written by Charles
Ludlam. Directed by Christopher Henley. Musical staging by Kari Ginsburg.
Design: Andrew J. Berry (set) Jennifer Tardiff (costumes) Sarah Kamins
(properties) Marianne Meadows (lights) David Crandall (sound) C. Stanley
(photography) Patrick Magill (stage manager). Cast: John C. Bailey, John
Kevin Boggs, Frank Britton, Kim Curtis, James Finley, Jay Hardee, Erin
Kaufman, Daniel Kenner, Jay Saunders. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
Small Craft Warnings
April 9 - May 17, 2009
Thursday - Saturday at 8 pm
Saturday and Sunday at 2 pm
Reviewed April 17 by
Brad Hathaway |
Tennessee Williams'
evening-in-a-bar play staged in a bar
Running time 2:00 - one intermission
v
simulated sex acts brief partial nudity
Tickets $25 - $35
Click here to buy the script |
One more time, this often adventurous company comes up with a new way to use
the space at the Clark Street Playhouse before their time in the spot runs
out. (The playhouse is slated for eventual removal to make way for a new
development.) They have used the cavernous main warehouse-like space in the
round, in thrust and flanked stage configurations and even with the audience
in the middle and the sets around the edges. The lobby has been converted to
various configurations for other productions and even the storage and
workshop space has been called into service. Now they close off the lobby
to
turn it into a bar - a seedy one at that. The audience sits in "Monk's
Place" along with the cast as a little-known and rarely performed late work
by Tennessee Williams is brought to somewhat lethargic life before their
eyes. It is an atmosphere play, and the company creates all the atmosphere
you could want. The performances are all intriguing even when the script
slows to a crawl.
Storyline: Not much happens in a typical night in a dilapidated watering
hole along California's Pacific Coast Highway. Small craft warnings have
been posted due to heavy fog and possible squalls, but inside the bar there
is fog enough and and the squalls are of the short tempered variety. The
denizens of the dive alternate between shouting matches, flirtations,
bragging sessions and an occasional sexual diversion.
Williams is one of America's great playwrights, but this
is not one of his great plays. It dates to 1972, well after The Glass
Menagerie, A Streetcar Named Desire, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof or the other
well known plays of his prime. By the 1970s it was all down hill. He still
could create characters of soulful despair but rarely energized their lives
with dramatically captivating situations. Oh, there is the doctor whose
drinking leads to a botched birthing. That is a plotline that has promise.
And the relationship between the homosexual would-be bon vivant and his
younger boy-toy is enigmatic enough to sustain some suspense. Other aspects,
such as the dual masturbation moment, the argument over the music of Jascha
Heifetz, or the failed attempt at oral sex, seem as if Williams reached into his trunk of episodes and incidents cut from drafts of earlier plays and
inserted them at moments in this script that required a bit of diversion.
There are a number of individual performances that
capture and hold your attention while the play plays out. John C. Bailey, as
the proprietor of the dive, watches the ebb and flow of temper with the keen
eye of one who knows precisely how far to let things go before taking action
to prevent mayhem. Christopher Henley, sporting a marvelous wig, moves with
exaggerated grace, while James Finley struts with macho menace. Kari Ginsburg
and Mundy Spears create very different characters of the girls spending
their evenings in the dive. Joe Palka is fascinating to watch as the
aforementioned brandy soaked doctor, and Erin Kaufman hovers about as the
"Bar Spirit" as if one of the ghosts had escaped from the Arlington Players
production of Follies over at the Thomas
Jefferson.
Stage mist, the subdued colors of the set, the
dramatic lighting and an occasional sonic reminder of the surf and storm
outside create the atmosphere the piece demands. Jennifer Tardiff adds a
wardrobe that tells a good deal about these people and their time at a
glance. Director Jay Hardee has the cast move about the space a bit more
than real people do in a bar, but that is an effective technique to provide
a spark of interest here and there. Something the play itself really needs.
Written by Tennessee Williams. Directed by
Jay Hardee. Fight direction by Thomas Wood. Design: Jay Hardee and Karen J.
Sugrue (set) Jennifer Tardiff (costumes) Amber Krause (properties) Jason
Cowperthwaite (lights) David Crandall (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography)
Zachary W. Ford (stage manager). Cast: John C. Bailey, Brian Crane, James
Finley, Kari Ginsburg, Christopher Henley, Erin Kaufman, Joe Palka, Michael Sandoval, Mundy
Spears, Thomas Wood. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
January 22 - February 15, 2009
The Cherry Orchard
Reviewed January 22 by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:40 - one intermission
Price $25 - $35
An unorthodox approach to Chekhov's classic
Click here to buy the script |
Christopher Henley and Gaurav Gopalan team, jointly directing what was
going to be the last production of the company in its long-time home, the
Clark Street Playhouse. The company has received a reprieve, however, so the
magic will continue. When Artistic Director Henley put together the 2008-09 season, the
selection of this play made a great deal of sense. It is about
being forced to leave your home, with all the emotional dislocation that
involves. It is a play that captures the mixture of warm and often humorous
memories of the past and the pain of loss, even if it does somehow manage to
miss the fear of the future that is so often part of departure. It is a good
thing, however, that this won't be the last show in this house. It would be a shame if the last experience in the hall that has
hosted so many fine theatrical moments turned out to be this rambling,
overly mannered comic approach to a play that requires the one thing Henley
and Gopalan fail to ask of their large cast: restraint.
Storyline: As the twentieth century
approaches, bringing new ways to old Russia, the favored class are loosing
their privileges and Madame Ranevskaya is loosing her family estate. Various
proposals that might keep the estate from being auctioned off are presented
but she cannot bring herself to accept any of them. As the family, their
retainers and neighbors gather for a last time, the estate is purchased by a
wealthy neighbor whose family were once serfs on this land. After all but an
elderly servant depart, the sound of woodsmen is heard. They are chopping
down the trees to clear the estate’s cherry orchard for development.
Anton Chekhov’s final play can be an affecting
tragedy with wry accents, or it can be a
warm comedy with sad overtones. It was Chekhov's last play, opening at the
Moscow Arts Theatre in 1904. The premiere, directed by Konstantin
Stanislavsky, took the melodramatic approach to the piece and played down
the comedy. Subsequent productions have gone the other direction at times.
Chekhov's carefully calculated mixture of tragedy and comedy is difficult to
accomplish but the key to a successful production is just how close it comes
to finding that balance. Henley and Gopalan do not strive for that balance,
however, attempting to find the illogic of human existence in the piece. It
is an approach that is probably even harder to pull off, and this production
suffers from that difficulty.
The large cast provides a few notable performances,
especially that of Lynn Sharp Spears as the can't-make-up-her-mind landowner. Adam Jonas Segaller's approach as the
wealthy son of a former serf is a bit more confusing, ranging from his
initial sleepy appearance to a frenetic moment or two. John Moletress takes
on the role of a governess in drag and gives perhaps the strongest
individual performance of the evening. Kim Curtis offers an interesting take
on a neighboring landowner while Richard
Mancini provides perhaps the most consistently watchable performance as a dutiful
servant.
The hodge-podge nature of the production is
reflected in the set which is a white, elevated platform with a
ghostly-white collection of the kind of junk that might have collected in
the mansion's basement or crawl-space squeezing out from underneath and a
Greek-style pediment on top. There's even a hole in the flooring through
which characters pop up or drop down in a disconcerting
Alice-through-the-rabbit-hole effect. Add a sound design that includes
everything from West Side Story's "I Feel Pretty" to jazz violin to
balalaika music and you get the message. Nothing is permanent and nothing
relates to everything else.
Written by Anton Chekhov. Translated by Laurence
Senelick. Directed by Christopher Henley and Gaurav Gopalan. Choreographed
by Heather Haney. Design: Elizabeth Jenkins McFadden (set) Zoe Cowan
(costumes) Stephanie Junkin and Sarah Kamins (properties) Jason
Aufdem-Brinke (lights) David Crandall (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography)
Stephanie Junkin (stage manager). Cast: Sara Barker, Dior Ashley Brown, Evan
Crump, Kim Curtis, D. S. A. Deen, John Geoffrion, Melissa Marie Hmelnicky,
K. Clare Johnson, Erin Kaufman, Richard Mancini, John Moletress, Julie
Roundtree, Jay Saunders, Adam Jonas Segaller, Lynn Sharp Spears, Thomas
Wood.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 6 - December 7, 2008
All's Well
That Ends Well
Reviewed November 11 by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:30 - one intermission
A stylish presentation of Shakespeare's comedy romance
Click here to buy the script |
When you layer charm, wit, style and energy over a problem play you still
have a problem play. Joe Banno applies his considerable directorial skill to
this "so what?" romance and creates a very pleasant evening of theater.
However, when the gimmicks are better than the play you wonder why they
didn't just pick a better play to produce. Actually, this is the second time
a skilled director has tried to divert attention from the play's problems in
recent years in the Potomac Region. In 2003 Richard Clifford tired it at
Folgers and took the diametrically opposite approach from Banno's treatment.
He treated the romantic comedy as a romance while Banno emphasizes the
comedy. Of the two approaches, the romantic one worked best but neither
turns a less than satisfying play into a delight. Banno's approach does
offer touches of note including a striking set, some wonderful costumes and
fun performances in a number of roles. Neither production, however, solved
the problem of the shallowness of the count the heroine unaccountably sets
her sights on. Here it is Parker Dixon who plays the count, and he's
attractive enough to earn the fair Helen's attention on first glance, but
there's nothing to support a second look let alone falling hook, line and
sinker for the guy. |
Storyline: By curing the dying King of France, the daughter of a doctor
earns the right to marry the courtier of her choice, but the man of her
dreams only takes her to the alter, not to his bed or his heart. He's so
blind to her charms he says he'll only respect the marriage if she can bear
him his heir. She follows him on a trip to Italy where he tries to seduce
one of the local girls. Switching with the girl he desires, she goes to his
bed, conceives his child and win's her place at his side.
Banno sets the action in the early days of
World War II which gives Melanie Clark the opportunity to use a wide range
of costume clichés to full advantage. Mundy Spears as the love-sick young
lady is outfitted in something that might be right out of a USO-hosted dance
for the troops while Ian Armstrong struts his stuff in a black uniform
strikingly outlined in red piping. Kim Cutis as the King isn't in a crown
but, rather, a uniform cap that could be from the French Foreign Legion and
Nathan Weinberger is unmistakable as a butler with his grey tails and white
gloves.
Spears sheds the USO dance dress in the early
going, showing off her form in lacy under-things. She's quite a vision that
way, and the lack of if not romantic reaction then at least lustful
attention on the part of Dixon sets the tone for the cluelessness that
Shakespeare wrote into the role. Dixon isn't in the slightest responsible
for the failure of the part in the context of the plot the Bard constructs.
We've yet to see anyone solve the conundrum of the piece. But surely
emphasizing the sexual allure and charm of the woman he ignores isn't going
to do it. Cam Magee and Weinberger are a fine comic team as the groom's
mother and her butler, but it really is the comic verve of Armstrong that
carries scene after scene that otherwise would simply fall flat.
Hannah J. Crowell's black, white and grey set design
reminiscent of art deco film sets for Busby Berkeley movies is both
impressive and effective although the murals on the back walls of the Clark
Street Playhouse are difficult to decipher. Just what a black portrait of a
pistol on a white wall, or a white portrait of a blindfolded woman on a
black wall have to do with this comic romance or romantic comedy is never
made clear. Or, just perhaps, this reviewer missed it in its entirety.
Written by William Shakespeare. Directed by
Joe Banno. Design: Hannah J. Crowell (set) Melanie A. Clark (costumes) Amber
Krause and Kaleigh Showers (properties) David C. Ghatan (lights) Christopher
Baine (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Amber Krouse (stage manager). Cast:
Ian Armstrong, Kim Curtis, Parker Dixon, Jay Hardee, Lindsay Haynes, Cam
Magee, Stephanie Roswell, Jay Saunders, Lyn Sharp Spears, Mundy Spears,
Joseph Thornhill, Nathan Weinberger, Chuck Young. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
August 28 - September 28, 2008
Peace
Reviewed September 2 by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:10 - one intermission
A contemporary, and quite funny, take on a Greek comedy
Click here to buy the
original
Greek comedy |
Aristophanes of Athens was a brilliant satirist of the weaknesses,
pretensions and foibles of his contemporaries. Many of those aspects
evidenced themselves in traits that we might recognize today, but the
specific elements of style and the events and individuals he lampooned have
long faded from popular memory. How do you breathe fresh air into the stuffy
remains of such a light and airy concoction as his play about a mortal who
flies to heaven on the back of a giant dung beetle in order to plead with
the Gods to give peace a chance? You could give the audience a heavy tome
with a lengthy glossary so they could study up in order to understand the
jokes. But, as the saying goes, if you have to explain a joke, it isn't very
funny by the time you get done. The other approach, the one taken by local
playwright Callie Kimball, is to update it. Oh, there's still the need for a
mortal to fly up to find the gods (who, by the way, aren't in when he gets
there) and it helps to have a few Greek characters around. But in Kimball's
re-telling, everything comes in for lampooning from Blackberries to
PowerPoint presentations and from NAFTA to the Euro to Viagra to war
profiteers. (Well, not everything seems to have changed all that much in
2,429 years.)
Storyline: A mortal rides a hot air balloon to the palace of the Gods in
the hope of convincing them to bring an end to the current war on Earth. He
finds only Hermes ("The administrative assistant to the Gods") in residence
and it turns out that Peace is being held prisoner, having been declared an
enemy combatant. Just freeing Peace isn't enough, however, for she (yes,
Peace is a she) refuses to go Earthward unless he marries one of her
daughters. Being already married, the mortal resists -- but the wills of Gods can't
be resisted for long.
Aristophanes'
Peace won a second place prize in the Dionysian Festival in Athens in
421 BC. It was a social satire and its barbs were not at all disguised. 421
was a time of heightened emotions over questions of peace and war with the
Peloponnesian War in full force until the Peace of Nicias brought it to a
merely temporary halt. It had only been a year or so since the previous
attempted break in hostilities between Athens and Sparta and her allies, the
Peloponnesian League. Aristophanes even included the recently killed
commander Cleon in his comedic sights, albeit with kid gloves. Kimball
levels her fire at a wide range of contemporary targets but steers clear of
some of the more tempting targets that divide public discourse in this
election year. Still, there are laughs aplenty as she takes on everything
from the Human Genome Project to celebrities and pseudo-celebs from Mr.
Rogers to Telly Savalas.
No sharp tongued, barb filled comedy can work without
a cast that can spit out the calumny with aplomb. Here, the Washington
Shakespeare Company has come up with a fine cast of newcomers and returnees
who handle the mostly dual role parts with a sense of energy and delight
under Alexander Strain's clear direction. Company veteran John Geoffrion is
only the peace-seeking mortal but he's fun to watch and listen to in the
role, while Sara Barker (Jackie-O in
The House of Yes
here) is sharp and clear both as his mortal wife and as Hermes, spokesperson
for the Gods. New to the company are a few delights. Brandon McCoy and Matt
"Slice" Hicks team up as a pair trading questions and answers covering
everything from the mysteries of the book of Genesis to the differences
between "burger farts" and "beer farts." The highest energy level comes, as
it should given the nature of the role, from Joe Brack, who, as a wedding
party Disc Jockey keeps things moving right along through much of act two.
Anastasia Wilson is the Godess Peace who doesn't have much to say, but when
she does open her mouth you better pay attention. She's the one who so
neatly summarizes Kimball's (and Aristophanes'?) major point: "In Times of
War, fathers bury their sons. In times of Peace, sons bury their fathers."
It is a piece of dialogue given a footnote in the script attributing
it to Horodotus.
One wonders what Washington Shakespeare
Company set designer Tobias Harding must have thought when he first saw the
faux-Grecian colonnade the Democrats constructed as a backdrop for Barak
Obama's acceptance speech in Denver which drew such a large television
audience the same night this production opened. The structures aren't
identical, but they both evoke the same feeling from the same architectural
vocabulary. Harding's, however, has a canopy of three cloth strips, one of
which drops down in the second act to create an altar for the proposed
wedding.
Written by Callie Kimball. Inspired by the play by
Aristophanes. Directed by Alexander Strain. Design: Tobias Harding (set)
Yvette M. Ryan (costumes) Amber Krause and Kaleigh Showers (properties)
Andrew F. Griffin (lights) Christopher Baine (sound) Ray Gniewek
(photography) Jenn Carlson (stage manager). Cast: Sara Barker, Joe Brack,
Brian Crane, Matt Dewberry, John Geoffrion, Gwen Grastorf, Matt "Slice"
Hicks, Brandon McCoy, Andrew Vergara, Anastasia Wilson, Simone Zvi. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 19 - July 20, 2008
Red Noses
Reviewed
June 28 by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:40 - one intermission
An Avant-Garde comedy of coping with Bubonic Plague
|
You know those sliced-in-half red plastic balls that clowns paste (or strap)
on their noses? They are what the title of this strange diversion means.
Strange? Oh, yes! Diverting? Also yes! It's a bit too long (principally
because of the unfortunate diversion of a play within a play that both
breaks the rhythm of the piece and adds to its already excessive running
time). It certainly stretches credulity. However, in co-directors Jay Hardee
and
John Geoffrion's hands, the twenty member cast playing over thirty named
roles manage to keep it all straight, make it clear within its own
convoluted logic and maintain a high entertainment quotient. There are a
number of impressive individual performances but the evening is most
impressive for the work of John C. Bailey as the clown who starts it all.
Storyline: In the age of the black death, a friar in his brown robe dons
a clown's red nose to divert the population from its attention to the
plague then spreading throughout Europe. He recruits followers into a band
of "Christ's Clowns," believing that laughter may not be the best medicine
but it is the only way to maintain sanity.
Peter Barnes' strange play won the Olivier
Award for Best New Play in 1985. Barnes seems to specialize in plays that
leap over time periods. While this one is set during the plague which killed
some 75 million people worldwide including as much as half of the population
of Europe during the Papacy of Clement IV (1342-1352), other works of his
deal with Leonardo da Vinci (Leonardo's Last Supper), Spain's
seventeenth century king, Philip IV (The Bewitched) and one that
juxtaposed Russia's Ivan the Terrible of the sixteenth century with Nazi
horrors of the twentieth in a satire amazingly titled Laughter.
As Christ's Clown called by God to spread joy through
"the heresy of humor," John C. Bailey does some of his best, most defined
and highly polished work to date. Joe Palka ratchets up the level of
bizarreness as an Archbishop who fends off the plague with sprays of vinegar
and a fly swatter and Christopher Henley pulls off the admirable feat of
enunciating so clearly as Pope Clement IV that he can be understood through
the gas mask he wears under his miter. Add a Hindu mime (Melissa Marie
Hmelnicky in a graceful performance) a stand up comic with a stutter (Evan
Crump who looses the stutter when speaking through a puppet) and a one
legged ballerina (Caitlin Smith hobbling around with a crutch) and you have
quite an ensemble.
Costume designer Jennifer Tardiff provides garb in a
wide range of styles, flirting with chronological confusion to match the
tone of the text. Bailey is in simple brown friar's robes and Henley's
finery (with the exception of the gas mask) is fairly traditional papal
garb, although without the crimson cape Clement IV wore in many of the
portraits that come down to us. Others, however, sport jeans and crocks and
the "corps carriers" are in black gothic outfits with ravens' masks. Props
are similarly anachronistic - fourteenth century revelers go on a picnic
with a 7-Eleven Styrofoam cooler - while the incidental music ranges from
chant to "The House of the Rising Sun." It all takes place, of course, on a
three-ring stage.
Written by Peter Barnes. Directed by Jay Hardee and
John Geoffrion. Dances choreographed by Heather Haney. Fights choreographed
by John C. Bailey and Thomas Wood. Design: Michael Roike (set) Jennifer
Tardiff (costumes) Andrew F. Griffin (lights) David Crandall (sound) Ray
Gniewek (photography) Amber Krause (stage manager). Cast: John C. Bailey,
Frank Britton, Brian Crane, Evan Crump, Kim Curtis, Kevin Finkelstein, Jack
Fitzmorris, John Geoffrion, Kari Ginsburg, Heather Haney, Christopher
Henley, Melissa Marie Hmelnicky, Erin Kaufman, Ellie Nicoll, Joe Palka, Matt
Provance, Caitlin Smith, Josh Sticklin, Emily Webbe, Thomas Wood. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
February 7 - March 9, 2008
Hedda Gabler
Reviewed by
David Siegel |
Running time 2:20 - one intermission
A production for aficionados of cooler approaches to theater |
Freshening-up of a classic such as Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler (1890) is a
necessary but risky venture. Iconic plays can always use new generational
attitudes to find contemporary meanings or a lost subtext in what may have
grown musty over time. As directed by Christopher Henley using the recent
Andrew Upton adaptation, the Washington Shakespeare Company production is an
initially cool, detached approach marked with some modern flourishes in its
portrayal of the title character. This Hedda is a manipulative rogue,
consciously out to control others. The pre-show music helps this
interpretation with titles such as “The Lady is a Tramp.” Heather Haney’s
Hedda is quickly at odds with the stiff creatures that surround her,
including her way-too-emasculated mommies-boy husband. This Hedda may be
conflicted at points, but her trajectory is clear; to fight society and
twist it about to fit into her scheme of life. With all the artic cold in this
production, Haney’s shimmering blond lean beauty is like a torch in the
proceedings. Even the lighting patterns seem to always give her creamy skin
a glow as if she is painted with light reflecting make-up. But, as the
production moves along and bits of heat are applied here and there with the
entrances of Frank Britton as the slick Judge and Adam Jonas Segaller as her
ex-lover, the passion seems forced and almost out of place in this cold,
calculated production. Death becomes her, but it seems to get there in a
long, almost melodramatic last scene.
Storyline: Hedda Gabler Tesman returns home
after a long honeymoon with her new husband Jorgen Tesman, an aspiring
academic. As the play progresses it becomes clear that Hedda feels confined
in the marriage and in society in general. Hedda’s old suitor appears, as
does a slick local Judge, and her old friend who has just left her husband.
All ends badly for most, with Hedda taking her own life.
Playwright Henrik Ibsen (1828-1906) was one of
the most influential playwrights of his time. His work was often of
passionate but tragic lives of those who tried to push through society’s
boundaries and barriers. His work is appealing to this day and is often
revived. Upton adapted the original script for a production that starred his
wife, Australian actress Cate Blanchett. That production must have been a
star turn. With Ms. Blanchett as Hedda, one wonders even if the adaptation
had been a horror, would anyone have had the audacity to say so when it was
performed in Australia? But, for another theater company and without,
Blanchett - well, that is clearly not an easy task. Director Christopher
Hanley has approached this production with a stylized attitude, rather than
a naturalistic approach. He seems to be trying to be hip and classic at the
same time. It is a tough thing to do. The modern touches of the Hedda
seen here seems almost parachuted onto the set. As the audience enters the
theater, the entire cast is standing or sitting “at places.” All except
Haney’s Hedda who is seen pacing about with the energy of a cat, and a
shadowy male figure running in place behind a curtain filtering his full
appearance. The cast is all dark costumed or darkly featured, except for
Haney with her shimmering creamy skin, golden hair and soft flaxen colored
corset dress. The odd touches in this production include the all too
frequent use of reduced lighting intensity to almost black-out moments on
stage with ominous music playing to emphasze a particular phrasing or script
nuance. And then there is the invisible hand playing a triangle whenever the
word “love triangle” is used. This reviewer thought of the old Groucho Marx
show when a duck dropped down when the magic word was uttered.
Heather Haney’s Hedda is a
glowing presence, her skin, her hair, her costumes … she is the only color
dropped into a black and white film. With her cat-like pacing throughout the
production, Haney presents a figure dying to live with abandon and no
responsibilities, while the rest of the cast is sedentary and lost. As her
womanly foil, the usually assured Kathleen Akerley feels miscast as a
submissive mouse who has taken a bold move; leaving the husband she does not
love for a life with a hot-blooded young academic who also happens to be the
ex-lover of Hedda Gabler. Somehow, Akerley’s tall figure and strong features
and long hair seem wrong for the part of a little mouse. Daniel Eichner’s
Jorgen Tesman is such a prissy little boy that, for Hedda to have married
him would have meant he had money or was great in intimate settings; the
latter does appears likely. Adam Jonas Segaller, a dark-eyed, soulful
presence brings heat to his role as Hedda’s ex-lover who ends up killing
himself by shooting off his male member either accidentally or purposefully.
He does take a rather strange turn as a blood soaked apparition walking
about in the background in a hypnotic daze in the final minutes of the
production, while others speak their lines. Frank Britton’s Judge is a
delightfully “alive” character with his shiny bold pate, facial hair, his
clipped speaking manner and his calm, know-it-all attitude as he holds the
goods on Hedda and is prepared to use them to save his own reputation.
Marta Karl’s Aunt Jilie Tesman is one over-bearing woman with love that
envelopes to the point of drowning others in her own neediness.
The Clark Street Playhouse
is used to its fullest as the set is laid at on the floor and the risers
force the audience to look down on the players. There are several playing
areas that are best set off by Marianne Meadows’s lighting design. Sound
designer David Crandall has pre-show musical selections and background
melodic tunes that provide guidance as to what is happening on stage or
might in the very next second. Costumes are set at the top of the show and
easily give visual clues as to who is what in temperament.
Written by Henrik Ibsen. Adapted by Andrew
Upton. Directed by Christopher Henley. Design: William Fisher (set) Brandon
R. McWilliams (costumes) Buck McGuffin (properties) Marianne Meadows
(lights) David Crandall (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Amy Millican
(stage manager). Cast: Kathleen Akerley, Frank Britton, Daniel Eichner,
Heather Haney, Martha Karl, Adam Jonas Segaller and Caitlin Smith.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
December 6, 2007 - January 19, 2008
The House of Yes
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 1:20 - no intermission
An off-beat black comedy of familial affection (another term for incest)
Click here to buy the script |
In rep with the delightfully flippant Kafka's Dick, this strange dark
piece is being given an earnest production that attempts to plumb the depths
of character in a family lacking both depth and character. Dysfunction can
be a source of great comedy or drama, and occasionally both. Not this time.
Here the inherent tragedy in the dramatic elements cancel out the humor in
the comedy - and vice versa. Perhaps its the stain of blood on the
recreation of Jackie Kennedy's pink suit that the mentally disturbed young
woman dons to play a game of assassination with her brother/lover that turns
the merely quirky into the something beyond the pale. Costume designer Erin
Nugent provides such an accurate recreation that it turns the tall and
slender Sara Barker into a time-warping vision of history rather than a
demented contemporary play acting woman/child. Under Colin Hovde's direction
all five characters are, like the pink suit, so close to the reality of
dysfunction that discomfort sets in early and stays with you throughout the
eighty minutes of the single act play.
Storyline: A young man who has had an incestuous relationship with his
sister brings his fiancée home to meet his strange family: his domineering
mother, his immature brother and his sister/former lover who is obsessed
with Jackie Onasis. His brother and his fiancée hop into the sack for some
sex early on and his sister/former-lover wants to renew the affair with a
game - acting out the parts of Jackie and Jack in the limo in Dallas at that
fateful moment of the assassination.
Wendy MacLeod teaches drama and is the playwright in
residence at Ohio's Kenyon College, and has a half dozen plays to her credit
in addition to this one which was made into a movie that went fairly quickly
from theatre screen to DVD. The subtitle of this of black comedy is "A Suburban
Jacobean Play." Jacobean, as in the plays written during the reign of James
I of England (or "Jacob Rex," using the Hebrew name from which "James"
evolved) when theatre concentrated on the shocking side of evil. At least
Jacobean tragedy did. MacLeod's rather labored effort to layer Jacobean
features on this simple tale include making the brother and sister twins
(shades of Greek tragedy?) whose mother informs the fiancée in her very
first conversation with her future daughter in law that her daughter's hand
"was holding (her brothers') penis at birth."
Jason Stiles and Jay Hardee are the brothers in the
family. Stiles establishes an initial sense of sanity as the one who has
tried to break away from a disturbed past with some success, as witness the
fact that he's actually established a relationship outside the demented
family home. He resists a descent back into the pit of incestuous
involvement, but succumbs in carefully measured steps. Hardee has no such
reach for normality in his character -- he's simply a selfish manipulator
from the start. Both Stiles and Hardee touch the truth of their unfortunate
characters. Sara Barker may be too true to the role, making it difficult to
spot the humanity under the veneer of instability, and Wendy Wilmer's
ramrod-stiff mother of the brood shows little of the maternal instinct that
might explain, if not justify, her protectiveness toward her children's
oddities. As the representative of the supposedly normal external world, the
fiancée whom Stiles has brought home to meet the family, played by an actress who
spells her name all in lower case (elisha efua bartels), provides little
indication of just why she'd give in to the inane seduction efforts of
Hardee within minutes of entering the troubled house.
Given that realism is the effect they all seem to be
going for, the design matches the performances well. MacLeod places the
action in the family home at Thanksgiving, but adds the foreboding touch
that a hurricane force storm is howling just outside the windows. Hannah
Crowell's set, which had to be designed to meet the requirements of both
shows in the repertory, works well with the rear wall that formed book cases
for Kafka's Dick now featuring windows being taped up for the storm,
and Matt Otto's sounds of wind, rain and thunder add to the apprehension.
Just why the ultimate assassination reenactment features a handgun rather
than a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle is left unexplained.
Written by Wendy MacLeod. Directed by Colin Hovde.
Design: Hannah J Crowell (set) Erin Nugent (costumes) Andrew F. Griffin
(lights) Matt Otto (sound) Ray Gnewiek (photography) Rob Barossi (stage
manager). Cast: Sara Barker, elisha efua bartels, Jay Hardee, Jason Stiles,
Wendy Wilmer. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 29, 2007 -
January 13, 2008
Kafka's Dick
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:10 - one intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for a screamingly funny first act and a second act
that is almost as good
(And, yes, the title's reference is to an anatomical issue)
Click here to buy the script |
That's Bruce Alan Rauscher cracking up and Christopher Henley, as Franz
Kafka, appearing bemused behind him in the photo on the right. It is a scene
from the Alan Bennett comedy that is being performed in repertory with
The House of Yes. It could well be a scene of audience reactions - for
these are the only two emotions experienced all evening long ... explosive
laughter and amusement. Not a jot of boredom, apprehension or sorrow. As Sondhiem once wrote: "tragedy tomorrow, comedy tonight!" Bennett's first act
is a non-stop assault on the funny bone with just enough exposition thrown
in to keep the plot moving and avoid accusations of being a comedy routine
instead of a comic play. But the outrageous concept, off-kilter
characterizations, running gags and manic energy as the story is being set
up are as well developed and highly polished as the best of routines. Under
Joe Banno's full-speed-ahead direction, Rauscher is hysterical and Henley
absurdly funny. It never gets to be anything less than a kick even though
things do bog down a bit as the plot turns get too heavy for the gossamer
tone of the early going.
Storyline: A time-bending comedy finds Czech writer Franz Kafka appearing
decades after his death to find that, in contravention to his explicit
instructions prior to his death, his good friend didn't burn his manuscripts
but published them instead, and, to add insult to injury, also wrote a
best-selling biography about him. Posthumous psychological profiles of
Kafka had concentrated on the impact his abusive father had on his
self-image. But Franz isn't the only Kafka to slip through time to appear,
along with his late biographer, in the home of an insurance man writing an
article on him for "The Fine Print: The Journal of Insurance Studies." Also
showing up is his father who tries to blackmail his son into exonerating him
of allegations of abuse.
With his Olivier and Tony awards for the amusing but
serious-minded The History Boys bestowing a sense of somewhat somber
seriousness on his public image, Alan Bennett's early, laugh-filled fancies
may come as a surprise to some. But remember, he was one fourth of the team
that burst onto the consciousness of comedy fans with Beyond the Fringe
along with Dudley Moore, Jonathan Miller and Peter Cook -- the thinking man's
alternative to Monty Python when it came to British humor. In this 1986
play, Bennett mines the vein of literary humor as well as hitting all the
expected topics of social criticism for which this kind of comedy is known.
Some of his funniest lines involve more contemporary authors, especially
Tennessee Williams and Evelyn Waugh.
As absolutely marvelous as Rauscher and Henley are,
they aren't alone on this stage. There
is John Geoffrion doing nice supporting work as the would-be Kafka expert
and Adrienne Nelson (as his wife) filling out a velour lounging outfit with the requisite
pulchritude and playing the sexuality brightly (but mangling some of the
dialogue with a too-thick British accent) and Brian Cassidy as an elderly
gent whose appearances all lead up to a genuine belly laugh. The
tremendously talented Ian Armstrong has the unfortunate fate of coming in a
bit too late with a part a bit too strong -- he's Kafka's dad who blackmails
his son with the threat of revealing what he suspects is the anatomical
reason for all of his son's peculiarities that biographers have attributed
to mal-parenting. He's fun in the role but it is jarring nonetheless.
Hannah Crowl's distinctive set features a wall of
slats at an angle creating a series of slanted bookcases filled with
identically bound volumes before a two-level playing space. But Banno
doesn't confine himself to using that playing space alone. No, he has
Rauscher out in the audience, prowling along the rows, excusing himself as
he knocks the knees of patrons and generally assuring that everyone is
paying attention. Once he reverts to on-stage blocking, Rauscher is still
addressing the audience directly from time to time to comment on aspects of
the action ("That's the trouble with big tits - the mind goes on holiday").
Written by Alan Bennett. Directed by Joe Banno.
Design: Hannah J. Crowell (set) Kimberly Dawn Morell (costumes) Andrew F.
Griffin (lights) Matt Otto (sound) Ray Gnewiek (photography) Donna Reynolds
(stage manager). Cast: Charlotte Akin, Ian Armstrong, Bryan Cassidy, John Geoffrion, Christopher Henley, Adrienne Nelson, Bruce Alan Rauscher. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
October 11 - November
11, 2007
Caligula
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:15 - one
intermission
A handsome staging of an exploration of a Roman Emperor's excesses
v
strong sexual content and brief nudity |
The history of Rome provides such a wide range of drama. From Shakespeare to
Shaw, toga-clad heroes and villains stride across innumerable stages.
Christopher Henley plucks one fairly obscure Roman history play from the
collection and gives it a strikingly visual staging with a fine performance
at its center, its title character. The production of Albert Camus' 1938
portrayal of debauchery as an instrument of statecraft is at its best in the
first act, as the philosophical point of the play is made with some
devastating images and Alexander Strain as Caligula approaches the boundary
between unchecked rationality and uncontrolled insanity. However, it veers
out of control after that boundary has been breeched in the second half and
Strain's Caligula exchanges his toga for a bustier and mesh stockings.
Storyline: Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus
Germanicus, known better simply as Caligula, third emperor of Rome, earns
his reputation for depravity, debauchery and cruelty, in a short reign that
ends with his assassination by a court threatened by his increasingly
outlandish demands.
The history
play as philosophical exercise has been a theatrical staple since its
inception - theater's inception that is. Think Aeschylus, Sophocles, and
Euripides who wrote tragedies based on stories from Greece's already dark
past. Then think Shakespeare. Now think Albert Camus. Camus? Yes, the
distinctly 20th Century French philosopher who did so much to spread the
word of existentialism to the beat generation of the 50s. Camus wrote this
play at a time that Europe and, indeed, the entire world, was assessing the
impact of the rise of Hitler. The text explores the logic or illogic of a
demand for blind obedience by a ruler, but doesn't openly deal with any
perceived parallels between excesses of the past and excesses of the
then-present. Henley doesn't explore the Caligula/Hitler connection and,
instead, treats the play as an interesting example of the reductio ad
absurdum technique so often used in debate in which an assumption is taken
to its ultimate conclusion in order to demonstrate that it is flawed in the
first place. Here the assumption that obedience to authority is a good thing
is put to extreme stress.
Strain gives a strong performance of an unstable ruler
released from restraint. His isn't the only notable performance, however.
Kathleen Akerley is distinctive as both a Roman writer in Caligula's court
and the French writer Camus in Henley's intriguing opening for the show when
she appears to the audience in the lobby to introduce the action. (The
audience is then invited into the theater, passing between two rows of
centurions chanting "Note the exits. Turn off cell phones.") Heather Haney
is particularly impressive as Caligula's sister with whom he's incestuously
involved. Abby Wood and Rahaleh Nassri add two more well developed female
characters to the court. Among the males, Jay Hardee is fascinating in the
role of a young poet who, as the poet Camus would believe poets do, sees
through Caligula's posturing long before anyone else in the court, and Evan
Crump adds an ethereal touch as a reverse-polarity mirror image of Caligula.
The physical design for the production is notable for
its use of the great amount of space available in the Clark Street
Playhouse. Set designer Andrew J. Berry places a draped atrium to one side
of the stage and an open set of steps and passages on the other with plenty
of open space in front suggesting the openness of the Roman Forum. The
drapes around the atrium can't completely hide the atrocities committed
within, as the drapes are flimsy and shadows play over them when lit from
behind. This is particularly effective as a double rape is committed out of
sight but not out of the hearing of the victim's husband whose loyalty is
being put to the test. Strangely, Henley obscures that rape scene but plays
out a male-on-male rape in plain sight.
Written by Albert Camus. Translated by David Greig
based on a literal translation by Chris Campbell. Directed by Christopher
Henely. Design: Andrew J. Berry (set) Emily Dere (costumes) Robert Brown
(lights) Erik Trester (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Jenn Carlson (stage
manager). Cast: Katheleen Akerley, Frank Britton, Brian Crane, Evan Crump,
Kim Curtis, Parker Dixon, Theo Hadjimichael, Heather Haney, Jay Hardee,
Rahaleh Nassri, Francisco Reinoso, Alexander Strain, Abby Wood.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
August 16 - September 30, 2007
Private Lives
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:10 - two intermissions
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for a sparkling, high
fashion comedy
Performances at 1409 Playbill Café
Click here to buy the script |
Noel Coward’s much loved
sophisticated comedy is a strange choice for the often serious, always
adventurous, frequently classical Washington Shakespeare Company to mount in
a 35-seat back room of the theater community haunt on the northern side of the Potomac.
But their run at the Clark Street Playhouse on the south side of the 14th
Street Bridge is coming to a close soon as the former warehouse is
sacrificed to the gods of development, and they are branching out to new
spaces with new material. Coward subtitled this 1930 four-character play "an
intimate comedy." He probably had another meaning of the word "intimate" in
mind than a small room. Still, director H. Lee Gable and his
designers and cast cram a great deal of style and charm into the space even
if so few patrons are privileged to witness it at each performance. The show
doesn't perform this weekend (August 24 - 26) while Barbara Papendorp
performs her cabaret show of Coward Songs, but there are still 18
performances scheduled through September 23rd which means as many as 630
patrons can still see Bruce Alan Rauscher and Cam Magee bring Coward's
creation to life.
Storyline: Five years
after their divorce from a marriage that must have been marked by
unimaginable fireworks, two members of the upper crust of British society
that flourished between the world wars are each on their honeymoon with
their new spouses in separate bridal suites that happen to share a balcony.
When they discover each other’s presence, the old passion is reignited and
they flee for her flat in Paris, leaving behind, for the moment, their
respective spouses. Their reunion is marked by all the passion of the
earlier marriage and marred by all the incompatibility that destroyed it.
They may be older, but are they any wiser?
Bruce Alan Rauscher brings
a sense of charm and style to the part of the upper-class leading man, Elyot Chase,
whose flippancy is exceeded only by his urbanity. Coward wrote the part for
himself and endowed it with a host of fabulous lines as well as with an
internal consistency that makes it a delight in the hands of an actor who
can sink his teeth into material without seeming too calculated. Rauscher
throws off the bon mots with aplomb. As Amanda, the role Coward wrote for Gertrude Lawrence, Magee is a thinking-woman’s libertine, matching the
considerable emotional and intellectual strength of Rauscher/Elyot with
flare. Three decades before the coining of the term, she is the embodiment
of women's lib. Magee/Amanda is irresistible to Rauscher/Elyot precisely
because she is his intellectual equal. The chemistry between the two actors
is instantaneously obvious when their eyes first meet on the balcony in act
one, and the heat builds until it combusts.
Rauscher and Magee
aren't the only charmers on stage. The new
spouses deserted on their wedding nights are Megan Dominy and Jeremy Lister.
Each provides their respective spouses with effective foils for the early
scenes, but it is in the third act, when their characters team up only to
exhibit signs of the same combativeness that afflict Elyot and Amanda, that
they really shine. Gable adds a nice touch to link the second and third act.
He has Dominy and Lister, who make a brief appearance at the end of
the second act, remain on stage attempting to sleep away the hours before
the action resumes at dawn. Gable also converts the small
part of the maid in the third
act, nearly a walk-on,
into a split role --
maid/chanteuse -- so that Barbara Pappendorp can perform "Someday I'll Find
You," Porter's example of (his words, not mine) "how potent cheap music
is" in a live prologue to both of the first two acts.
The play requires two sets - one of the balcony of the
sea-side resort where Amanda and Elyot re-discover each other, and one of
the flat in Paris to which they abscond. This presents quite a challenge in
the confined space in 1409 Playbill. Designer Richard Montgomery doesn't
take the easy approach of a sketchy suggestion of the scenes. Instead, he
goes for two architecturally distinctive and highly detailed structures with
distinctive features for each. It means the stage crew must work awfully
hard between the first two acts, but the results are rewarding. Even more
rewarding are the costumes of Lynly Saunders who creates a wardrobe
expressive of the time, the wealth, the style and the class pretensions of
the characters, while, at the same time, actually looking as if these are the
clothes they wear, not just costumes for a play.
Written by Noel Coward.
Directed by H. Lee Gable. Musical direction by James R. Fitzpatrick. Design:
Richard Montgomery (set) Lynly Saunders (costumes) Jason Cowperthwaite
(lights) Erik Trester (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Zachary W. Ford
(stage manager). Cast: Megan Dominy, Jeremy Lister, Cam Magee, Barbara
Papendorp, Bruce Alan Rauscher.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 14 - July 22, 2007
Macbeth |
Running time 2:35 - one intermission
A superbly atmospheric presentation of Shakespeare's classic
v
Performed in the nude
Click here to buy the script |
Your first clue as to just how different this production will be from all
the others you may have seen is the front cover of the program. It doesn't
say "William Shakespeare's Macbeth" it says "José Carrasquillo's Vision of
Macbeth." When we first listed this production on Potomac Stages it was with the
proviso that "the production is said to feature
considerable nudity." Actually, it is total nudity. Anyone who would find
that offensive -- or so awfully distracting that they couldn't pay attention
to what author William Shakespeare wrote, director José Carrasquillo dreamed
or the superb cast of ten capable but unclothed actors and actresses are
doing on Giorgos Tsappas' tremendously atmospheric set -- should be
encouraged to stay away. Everyone else should be informed in no uncertain
terms that this is a quality production that presents "the Scottish play" in
a new and very effective light (or is that a new and very effective
darkness?). Not only is there no costume design credit because there are no
costumes, there is no sound design credit either. Thus, we aren't told who
to thank for the eerie sounds that compliment the production so well. There
are drum beats, whistles, screams, moans and screeches that members of a
primitive tribe might well make as a shaman tells a tale from the dark
depths of pre-history.
Storyline: With prophecies from three witches
ringing in his ears and driven by his wife’s ambitions, a Scottish lord
kills his King and assumes the throne only to find that he must commit other
murders to keep it. As guilt eats at him and at his wife, he is cornered and
killed by one of his own intended victims.
Shakespeare’s great tragedy of a Scottish King’s
rise to power through murder and his undoing through guilt is one of his
simplest stories in structure with the fewest subplots and diversions from
the central narrative. It is an almost uninterrupted progression toward the
terrible fate of the central characters and nearly every scene which doesn't
feature either Macbeth or his lady exists purely to set up some event that
contributes directly to their eventual destruction. Carrasquillo's
atmospheric staging enhances rather than distracts from that singularity of
story. While some may speculate that the naked approach was motivated at
least in part by the thought that it would stimulate ticket sales (and it is
undeniable that the matinee performance we saw was better attended than
would normally be expected of a beautiful weekend afternoon), the images Carrasquillo creates and the spell the cast casts more than justifies the
approach on purely artistic grounds.
That cast is headed by Daniel Eichner who is magnetic
as the early, ambitious Macbeth. His mad scenes are no match, however, for
those of Kathleen Akerley who is superb throughout the performance as Lady
Macbeth. She also doubles as Hecate, the Queen of the Witches. Her three
subordinates are Manshu Chang, Heather Haney, Ashely Robinson who are nearly
feral as the three witches with their oft-quoted "Double, double, toil and
trouble / Fire burn and cauldron bubble." Eichner is the only member of the
cast who does not double, triple or even quadruple to cover the more than
thirty speaking roles in the script. It is a tribute to Carrasquillo's
staging, and the cast's craft, that they are able to create recognizably
distinctive characters without costumes to change.
Tsappas' setting is a thing of theatrical beauty, a
triangular platform floating within a magical forest of nearly
Stongehenge-ish trees against a black background. The cast appears as an
apparition as the play gets underway and none leave the playing space
between scenes. Instead, any actor not engaged on the triangle is either
hunkered down on its perimeter or standing ramrod straight as if he or she
has become one of the trees. All is shrouded in darkness that is crafted
with care by lighting designer Ayun Fedorcha who actually should be billed
as darkness designer. She adds a very effective touch with a blood-red
spotlight shining straight down into an opening in the triangular stage that
serves as both the witches cauldron and washbasin allowing Akerley, as Lady
Macbeth, to have her hands turn red every time she tries to wash out the
famous "damn spot."
Written by William Shakespeare. Directed by José
Carrasquillo. Design: Girogos Tsappas (set) Marie Schneggenburger
(properties and tree sculpting) Ayun Fedorcha (lights) Ray Gniewek
(photography) Gaurav Gopalan (stage manager). Cast: Kathleen Akerley, Denman
C. Anderson, Manshu Chang, Daniel Eichner, Heather Haney, Jay Hardee,
Christopher Henley, Sasha Olinick, Lee Ordeman, Ashely Robinson.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
March 29 - April 29, 2007
Edward III
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:25 - one
intermission
A thoroughly satisfying production of a play only recently believed
to be by Shakespeare
Click here to buy the script |
Never mind whether Shakespeare wrote this "history play" or if it was the
product of some other pen. Joe Banno's staging of this rarely seen
sixteenth-century mixture of romance and war is a brisk, entertaining
evening with a striking and consistent sense of style and a number of
terrific performances. Of course, if you are at all interested in the
portion of the Bard's output that concentrated on the history of English
monarchs from King John through two Richards and four Henry's, the
opportunity to see rather than merely read this Bard-ish play is a treat.
Banno mounts it in modern dress with a distinctly modern but intriguingly
bare set and finds ways to keep the action moving along smartly while giving
key players and key scenes sharply delineated moments. As the King, Bruce
Alan Rauscher is superb. He has a fine blend of royal pride and human frailty
and delivers a hugely entertaining performance. Both
the women in Edward's life, his queen and the Countess he covets, are made more
than mere playthings in the performances of Callie Kimball and Karen Novack.
Jason McCool's youthful enthusiasm as Edward's son, the Prince of Wales
known as "The Black Prince" is quite effective as well.
Storyline: The forces of Edward III, King of England in the fourteenth
century, conquer Scotland to his north and rescue the imprisoned Countess of
Salisbury. Edward is immediately smitten with her but there are two objects
in the way of a love affair - her husband and his wife. War is on the
horizon as well to the east where the French King John stands in England's
way to continental power. Edward, distracted by his desire for the Countess
and determined to give his son, "The Black Prince," a chance to earn glory on
a battlefield, wages a longer and more costly war than he expected.
Edward III was first published in 1596, some four
years after Shakespeare was first referred to as an "Upstart Crow" in the
theatrical community of London. It didn't have any author listed - something
that wasn't too rare at a time preceding copyright laws. Indeed, what would
today be called "pirated copies" were the first written record of most of
Shakespeare's plays and the famous "first folio" of his works came out in
1623, eight years after his death. The 1596 printing was titled The
Raigne of King Edward III As it hath bin sundrie times plaied about the City
of London. As with the history plays that are recognized as definitely
by Shakespeare, this possible work of his takes liberties with strict
historical records. However, it's encapsulation of the key events of the
half-century reign of the King who started the Hundred Years War is based on
the history of the rulers of the Plantagenet family as seen through the eyes
of their successors, the Tudors, including Shakespeare's own Tudor Queen,
Elizabeth I.
David Ghatan's set consists of a platform in the
center of the Clark Street Playhouse with the audience placed on four ranks
of seats surrounding the playing space. The octagonal platform is rimmed by
metal swivel chairs so that the platform becomes a giant conference table
around which King Edward conducts his war councils with some of his aides
receiving war news via telephone. There's no confusing just who is King
here. Wherever Rauscher goes, an aide brings along an ermine cloth to drape
over his chair.
You wouldn't need that ermine clue, however, for
Rauscher's demeanor is consistently that of the man in charge. He's
comfortable with his royalty and expects the world to move in his preferred
path. Novack's strong-willed and wily Countess blends the dignity of her
character with a clear intelligence and the ability to see some of the
ironic humor in her plight. She's every bit a match for Rauscher. Kimball,
as his wife, doesn't have that much to do but she does it with flare, and
McCool captures the adventurousness of youth in his eyes both as he gets his
initial assignment to the battlefield and when he returns in triumph. The
large cast - twenty-five credited actors in the program - offers many nicely
tuned smaller roles including a striking King John played with dignity by
Chuck Young.
Written by William Shakespere (?). Directed by Joe
Banno. Design: David C. Ghatan (set) Erin K. Sutton (costumes) Andrew
F. Griffin (lights) W. Kavanaugh Latiolais (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography)
Jenn Carlson (stage manager) Cast: Barbara K. Asare-Bediako, elisha efua
bartels, Bryan Cassidy, Brian Crane, Evan Crump, Kim Curtis, Parker Dixon,
Daniel Eichner, John Geoffrion, Elizabeth Jernigan, Callie Kimball, Jennifer
Lutz, Jason McCool, Christine Millette, Karen Novack, Joe Palka, Bruce Alan
Rauscher, Brian Razzino, Francisco Reinoso, Arthur Rowan, Brian Rubiano,
Mundy Spears, Miyuki Williams, Abby Wood, Chuck Young. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
October 26 - December 3, 2006
Equus
Reviewed by
Brad Hathaway |
Running time 2:35 - one intermission
t
A Potomac Stages Pick for a raw psycho-drama performed
with intensity and intelligence
v
Includes nudity
Click here to buy the script |
Its pretty raw stuff that
Lee Mikeska Gardner presents in the hall we thought might well have been
demolished by now. Thank goodness the wreckers' ball has been put off for at
least another season. Gardner directs Jay Hardee and Christopher Henley in
Peter Shaffer’s disturbing exploration of psychiatric abnormality. The
results are raw in the very best sense of the word. The sense I
mean is the 9th definition in the dictionary ("not subtle, restrained or
refined," as in "the raw power of music"), but it is the one that clearly
applies. From the opening image of a naked man parading around with a horse
head sculpture through to the final exhausted denouement after a horrific
visage of (again naked) violence, and all that goes in between, Gardner
presents a progressively disturbing exposition of both psychiatric
aberration on the part of the patient and the hubris of the psychiatric
establishment that might presume to "cure" the causes of unacceptable in
human behavior at too high a cost.
Storyline: A psychiatrist with a few
psychological problems of his own is assigned the case of a teenager
arrested after having blinded five horses at the riding academy where he
worked as a stable boy. The psychiatrist establishes a level of trust with
the boy as he also obtains information from the boy’s parents and his
employer. A picture emerges of just why the boy would do what he did.
The play by Peter
Shaffer, author of such divergent material as the penetrating study of
genius, Amadeus, and the comedy Lettice and Lovage, is a
fascinating piece of work that builds two simultaneous psychological
portraits; that of the boy and that of the doctor. The boy's act of violence
and his withdrawal into an uncommunicative state presents the doctor with a
unique and challenging task. First he must determine what triggered the
events and then figure out what to do for the lad. What sets Shaffer's work
apart from other whodunits, or even whydunits, is that it challenges the
assumption that curing abnormality is a good thing. It isn't that the doctor
is faced with a "cure worse than the condition" situation. It is that the
condition involves the boy's capacity for "worship," the source of the
"rapture" that gives meaning to his existence. Can science be justified
if it destroys such capacities in order to control aberrant behavior?
Jay Hardee demonstrates again his uncanny ability to
sink so deeply into a character that the line between actor and acted blurs
completely. He's fascinating both in his periods of repressed emotion, when
he seems an explosion waiting to happen, and during the final horrible
release of energy and emotion. As staged here, he must fling himself into
that final explosion naked from the waist down but there is practically no
indication that he - or his character - is aware of being exposed. The
effect is magnetic. As the doctor, Christopher Henley takes a much more
intellectual approach, which is precisely the way Shaffer wrote it. He's
troubled and tortured. On opening night he was also suffering from a
terrible case of nasal congestion but still managed to deliver not just the
text of the part but the meaning of it as well. Cam Magee and Bruce Alan Rauscher contribute substantially as the boys' parents - she so devout in
her religious convictions and he an agnostic. Now there's a conflict to
bedevil any young man growing up in their household.
Abby Wood's set design is an exercise in effective
minimalism. The flexible space at the Clark Street Playhouse is configured
as a theater in the round with four banks of seats surrounding a square
playing area which is bare except for two chairs, a small round platform and
bales of hay. Straw is sprinkled around the perimeter. Hanging from chains
overhead are three metal horse head sculptures. The feeling of intimacy is
enhanced be the nearly unnoticed fact that only about half of the space in
that large room is actually used. Black drapes closing it in, making the
theater smaller. Artificial mist from a fogger turns every lamp in Eric
Dixon's lighting design into a shaft of light, with those focused on the
sculptures projecting horse head shadows on the black walls in the corners
to mark the area as a sort of primitive temple to the equine. Rapture,
indeed.
Written by Peter Shaffer. Directed by Lee Mikeska
Gardner. Design: Abby Wood (set) William Fisher (costumes) Eric Dixon
(lights) David Crandall (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Zachary W. Ford
(stage manager). Cast: elisha efua bartels, Kim Curtis, Jay Hardee,
Christopher Henley, Cam Magee, Denise Marois-Wolf, Adrienne Nelson, Bruce
Alan Rauscher, Joe Tippett. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 1 - July
2, 2006
The
Children's Hour |
Running time 2:05 - one intermission
An unorthodox reinterpretation of a 1934 drama featuring cross-gender
casting
Click here to buy the script |
All productions have strengths and weaknesses and this is no exception. Its
strengths include a number of fine performances, especially from Cam Magee
who is very good in one of the two leading roles for adult actresses. It is
an efficient streamlining of a normally three-act, two and a half hour play
into a two-act two-hour performance. (Just why anyone would want to
streamline it is not at all clear.) However it is its key weakness that is
the defining element of the production, and that is fatal. In an apparent
effort to turn a play about the universal issue of the damage a lie can
wreak into a play about the right to privacy of people who may have
unconventional sexual urges, director H. Lee Gable turns the casting on its
head and presents actor Christopher Henley in the other leading role for an
adult actress. His performance is highly mannered with much swishing of hips
and fluttering of hands. Whether you accept the mannerisms or not, however,
isn't the point. The point is that the casting of a male in the role
unbalances the entire piece, alters the message and generally does violence
to Lillian Hellman's first effort as a playwright.
Storyline: A disturbed student at a
struggling private girls school destroys the lives of the school's
proprietors by making allegations of sexual impropriety.
Lillian Hellman's 1934 drama used the
then-scandalous topic of lesbianism not as a subject, but as a tool in her
drama of the damage a lie can do. It established her as a major playwright,
setting the stage for The Little Foxes, Watch on the Rhine, and
Candide. It was an example of the kind of
naturalistic writing so popular in the second third of the twentieth
century. It was strongly plotted and peopled with characters with marked strengths and
weaknesses. The story was told in a series of scenes that were both interesting in their
own right and carried the plot forward in a literal, linear manner. It built
to an emotional climax all the more affecting because the audience cares
deeply for the people to whom it is happening. It is not well served
in this production by the effort to turn the tool into the theme.
The production starts well enough, with a scene
dominated by Suzanne Richard as the unwelcome relative sponging off her
niece who is played by Henley. Richard is superb in her first scene and very
good in what seems to be a highly truncated version of her last scene. Also
impressive are Annie Houston who has but one misstep playing the heavy - the
grandmother who believes her granddaughter's lie about the proprietors of
the girl's school and takes the actions which ruin their lives. (Her misstep
is the all-too-rapid acceptance of the first piece of evidence that the
granddaughter might be lying. Hellman specifically provided multiple clues
in her script so that the character could absorb the possibility of a lie
over time.) William Aitken does some nice work as well as Magee's fiancé who
tries to stick with her through rough times.
Gable indulges in additional unorthodox casting when
he has Jay Hardee in one of the key roles for adolescent girls and then
features actress Dana Edwards as the "Grocery Boy." Hardee is really
quite good as the girl blackmailed into supporting the lie. In his
biographical sketch he points out that he studied cross-gender performance
at Tufts University. Perhaps Henley should have taken the same class.
However, it isn't so much Henley's performance that damages the production
as it is Henley's casting, and this must be laid at the feet of director
Gable.
Written by Lillian Hellman. Directed by H. Lee Gable.
Design: Michael (Misha) Kachman (set) Melanie Clark (costumes) Jason
Cowperthwaite (lights) Ian C. Armstrong (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography)
Zachary W. Ford (stage manager). Cast: William Aitken, Elisha Efua Bartels,
Dana Edwards, Jay Hardee, Christopher Henley, Annie Houston or Jan Boulet,
Cam Magee, Suzanne Richard, Abby Wood. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
April 13 - May 14, 2006
Richard II |
Reviewed April 19
Running time 2:50 - one intermission
A semi punk styled mounting of a Shakespeare history play
Click here to buy the script |
SCENA Theatre's Robert McNamara puts his stamp on Shakespeare's history
play. That is good news for those who appreciate Mr. McNamara's aesthetic,
but not necessarily for those who appreciate Shakespeare's. While it is
never hard to remember you are watching a Shakespearean play, for the
language is rich and full in the meter of the master and the plot is
convoluted and complex, the staging draws attention away from the strengths
of the play in order to highlight the approach of the director and
accommodate the choices of the designers. In the process, the events of the
1390s come across as something like a gathering of the youths touted in
Hebdige's recent book Subculture: The Meaning of Style, with dark, semi-goth/semi-mod/semi-punk
outfits. Nothing wrong with any of that, of course. But where does that
leave Shakespeare's Richard, Bolingbroke, John of Gaunt, Queen Isabel and
the rest?
Storyline: Richard II, the last King of England of the Plantagenet line,
banishes his cousin Henry Bolingbroke for six years and then confiscates his property
to finance a war in Ireland. While Richard is out of the country pursuing
that unpopular war, Bolingbroke returns as a hero to those who have lost
faith in their king. When Richard returns, Bolingbroke takes him prisoner
and forces his abdication. Bolingbroke becomes the first King of England of
the house of Lancaster, the Henry IV of Shakespeare's next three plays.
McNamara does take a few liberties with the text, but
that is hardly unusual. The play, after all, is a typically lengthy five act
piece that has been tinkered with since at least the 1590s when it was brand
new. In today's director-driven age of theater, the play sometimes seems the
excuse rather than the reason for a production, so McNamara's approach is
scarcely a theatrical revolution. He's streamlined and re-focused where it
fits his view, and presents a solid two-act - or at least two part evening.
Any production of Richard II must have a fine Richard
and a strong Bolingbroke. One or the other is at the focus of practically
every scene. Here, Christopher Henley is mercurial one minute and morose the
next as this manic-depressive King who looses his crown and his life.
Hemmingsen is less satisfying as Bolingbroke, if only because he is called
upon to scowl so much that the future King's strengths, which supposedly
inspire his followers, are hard to discern. He does handle the big speeches
with a sense of class, however, and his physical aversion to the crown
itself provides a powerful image.
Some of the characterizations are overwhelmed by the
visual impact of the design. The fact that Henley's Richard II is in short
pants is not so much a symbol of immaturity as it is a fashion statement -
but what it says isn't quite certain. The painted pattern atop Hemmingsen's
bald pate could be a yarmulke, or a tattoo, or simply a foreshadowing of a
crown, but what is his white face makeup supposed to symbolize?
Kathleen Akerley delivers a performance as Queen Isabel which is all but
obscured by her clothing which consists of skirt and bra. Kim Curtis doubles
as John of Gaunt and the Abbot of Westminster but just which he is when he's
stripped above the waist in a wheel chair is hard to say. The distressed
black and white towering set fits the concept well as does the lighting by
Marianne Meadows who makes good use of florescent lights, something which is
unusual on stage.
Written by William Shakespeare. Directed by Robert
McNamara. Design: A.J. Guban (set) Jennifer Tardiff (costumes) Marianne
Meadows (lights) David Crandall (sound and music) Ray Gniewek (photography)
Eryn Chaney (stage manager). Cast: Kathleen Akerley, Denman C. Anderson, JJ
Area, Kim Curtis, Theo Hadjimichael, Jay Hardee, Rashard Harrison, Brian Hemmingsen, Christopher Henley, Alexandra Hoge, Allan Jirikowic, Richard
Mancini, Ryan McGrath, Adrienne Nelson, Buck O'Leary, Robert Rector, Nick
Scott, Dan Vanhoozer, Steve Whilhite.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
February 9 - March 12, 2006
Death
and the King's Horseman |
Reviewed February 14
Running time 2:40 - one intermission
An elegantly staged, intellectually engaging drama
Click here to buy the script |
In 1986, the Nobel Prize in Literature went to Nigerian playwright Wole Soyinka
for a body of work illuminating the values of his homeland and the history
of the relationships between African and European peoples and cultures. The
announcement of that award cited this play as being "in the nature of an
antique tragedy with the cultic sacrificial death as theme. The relationship
between the unborn, the living and the dead, to which Soyinka reverts
several times in his works, is fashioned here with very strong effect."
Indeed, it is. At least here, in the staging of John Vreeke, the moral force
of Soyinka's argument is well balanced with the dramatic aspect of the story
which, Soyinka assures us, is based on actual events that took place in the
Yoruba city of Oyo in Nigeria in 1946.
Storyline: The King of the Yoruba has died and the time approaches for
the man who has the honor of being the King's Horseman to commit suicide to
accompany him to heaven in the tradition of his tribe. The country, however,
is occupied by the colonialist British who view such traditions as
primitive. They determine to prevent the act with no care for the cultural
consequences of such intervention.
In the "Author's Note" printed in the program, Soyinka
objects to the description of his play as dealing with "a clash of cultures"
because such a label implies some sort of equality between the cultures. He
certainly doesn't straddle the line with an attempt to give balanced
arguments for each side. If you have any doubts as to the opinion of the
author about which of the two cultures is superior, you won't after the
scene between Nanna Ingvarsson as the wife of the British District Officer
and Clifton Alphonzo Duncan as the son of the horseman who efficiently
analyzes the essence of the colonial mindset and eloquently states the case
against it. This one scene, so eloquently written, effectively staged with
Duncan one step above Ingvarsson, and cleanly performed with an honest sense
on both sides of the obvious fundamental truth of their views, delivers the
author's judgment eloquently. The key to its dramatic impact is the honesty
with which the writing puts the pro-colonial view and the sincerity with
which Ingvarsson delivers them. Still, Duncan's elegant responses are all
you need to know about Soyinka's view of the world.
The Horseman here is Felipe Harris. While Soyinka's
text says that the Horseman is "a man of enormous vitality" who "speaks,
dances and sings with that infectious enjoyment of life which accompanies
all his actions," Harris plays it a bit more subdued as a man with a heavy
weight on his shoulders. After all, he has just lost his King and soon will
lose his life in an act of duty as well as honor. That additional layer of
character sets up the final scenes well, but it takes a while for his
performance to settle in. Ian Armstrong throws himself into the posturing
role of the British District Officer (referred to by the horseman as
"ghostly one") while the quiet dignity of Kamil J. Hazel as the horseman's
bride contrasts nicely with the passion of Towanda Underdue as the "Mother
of the Market" who takes the horseman to task for his failures. Richard
Mancini has a marvelous single scene as the embodiment of colonial
superciliousness.
Unlike many productions which seem to line up just the
standard assembly of designers (you can almost hear the producers say "lets
see, we need set, costumes, lights, sound . . . that should do it") the
Washington Shakespeare Company and director Vreeke have obviously approached
this project from scratch, assembling the unique talents needed for this
unique project. Yes, there is the fine set with two circular platforms on a
floor painted with Yoruban designs and the costumes are fine. But the design
team reaches beyond the norm with movement choreography that is fluid and
vital and a sound design that features the music and sounds of both cultures
and especially the drone of distant drums which give the piece a special
resonance. Finally, there is a fabulous piece of film projected on the one
white wall of the theater. Just where could projection designer Erik Trester
have come up with this black and white image of a ball?
Written by Wole Soyinka. Directed by John Vreeke.
Movement choreography by Brooke Kidd. Design: Misha Kachman (set) Genevieve
Williams (costumes) Erik Trester (projections) Ayun Fedorcha (lights)
Matthew Nielson (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Eryn Chaney (stage
manager). Cast: Ian Armstrong, Barbara K. Asare-Bediako, Frank Britton,
Mwangala Changwe, Maurice E. Clemons, Clifton Alphonzo Duncan, Constance
Ejuma, Felipe Harris, Kamil J. Hazel, Letricia Hendrix, Nanna Ingvarsson,
Micha Kemp, Joe Lewis, Richard Mancini, Nick Scott, Towanda Underdue.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
October 27 - December 10, 2005
Hapgood |
Reviewed November 5
Running time 2:20 - one intermission
A fast paced spy mystery
Click here to buy the script
|
Think of a James Bond movie without the cinematic chase scenes, graphic
violence or naked women, but with dialogue that earns the title adult not by
double entendre and innuendo but by literate language and genuine
intelligence. Kathleen Akerley was going to direct a cast including Jenifer Deal, Jay Hardee, Hugh T.
Owen, Jesse Terrill and Brandon Thane Wilson in Tom Stoppard's
end-of-the-Cold War thriller, but Deal was invited to do a show in Solvenia,
so Akerley stepped into the role while Christopher Henley took over
directing duties along with Alexandra Hoge.
Storyline: Someone is leaking secrets from the "Star Wars" program for a
Strategic Missile Defense to the Russians - and British Intelligence is on
the case. Who could be the leak? Is it the double agent - a Russian himself?
Is it a British spy? If so, could it be the boss of the British spy
operation, a woman named Mrs. Hapgood? Or is it all of them - or none
of them?
Tom Stoppard is not known for
simple, uncomplicated stories. Here he merges the advanced physics that the
Star Wars program tried to apply to Strategic Defense with some of its more
advanced projects, and the twists and turns of spy novelists. As Stoppard has
the Russian double agent explain, "The act of observing alters the reality."
It is that concept that seems to have fascinated him and he uses it to spice
up an otherwise fairly routine spy-versus-spy story with neat twists and
turns that can leave the audience bewildered in less capable hands.
Here co-directors Christopher Henley and Alexandra
Hoge, along with assistant director H. Lee Gable, keep the focus clearly on
the storytelling without seeming to presume the audience needs help. It is a
fine line they straddle and they do it well. Rather than stage the script
with constant movement and repeated quick shifts of tone, they stop the
action from time to time to concentrate on the dialogue, especially when it
deals with the science involved. As if to compensate, the physical design of
the set is slick, with its gleaming black floor, its black and chrome
sliding panels and a trio of furniture pieces that are moved about to create
locales from a bath house to Hapgood's office.
There is plenty of fine acting to enjoy as well.
Kathleen Akerley is the lady whose name is the title. She captures the
efficient assurance of a chief secure in her position (especially as decked
out in Melanie Clark's spot-on executive suit) and then reveals a more
earthy side when her world begins to come apart. Bruce Alan Rauscher is a
pleasure to watch as he delivers much of the scientific explanation with a
sense of real excitement over particle physics and the ways in which light
behaves at a fundamental level. Hugh T. Owen mixes it up with a sharp
portrayal of one of Hapgood's operatives and Ian Armstrong gets suitably
officious as the agent investigating the leak. Ben Wates adds a touch of
class early on simply by observing all the comings and goings in the opening
scene and then reporting crisply what he and we have just seen . . . only to
find it wasn't quite as clear as it seemed. Fun!
Written by Tom Stoppard. Directed by Christopher
Henley and Alexandra Hoge. Assistant Direction by H. Lee Gable. Design:
Elizabeth Jenkins McFadden (set) Melanie Clark (costumes) Nick Scott
(properties) Jason Arnold
(lights) Erik Trester (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Jenn Carlson (stage
manager). Cast: Kathleen Akerley, Ian Armstrong, Michael Dove, Jay Hardee,
Hugh T. Owen, Bruce Alan Rauscher, Nick Scott, Theodore M. Snead, Brandon
Thane Wilson. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
July 21
- August 28,
2005
The
Royal Hunt of the Sun |
Reviewed August 4
Running time 2:30 - one intermission
A spectacle of the clash between cultures
Click here to buy the script |
Obviously, Steven Scott Mazzola doesn't know it takes mega-bucks to produce
an epic. He seems convinced that all you need is talent, skill and
determination. You know what? He's right - and he's assembled a team with
those attributes in greater and lesser amounts to mount a spotty but
wholly worthwhile version of a play that most other theaters wouldn't touch
without a gigantic checkbook. It's a play that treats historical events
rarely seen on the stages of English speaking countries. It raises issues
which are sadly still relevant nearly five hundred years later. It isn't
produced very often precisely because so many theaters would only touch it
with deep pockets so the Potomac theater community is indebted to the
Washington Shakespeare Company for this chance to see the play produced.
Storyline: 167 Spaniards under the leadership of Francisco Pizarro invade
the empire of the Incas in search of gold. They take the sovereign,
Atahuallpa, hostage and hold him for a ransom of a room full of gold which
his subjects surrender. They execute him anyway so that he cannot lead his
nation against them as they return to Panama to sail back to Spain.
The play builds on history
but isn't really an effort to put historical accuracy on stage. The events
over the four years of Pizarro's conquest of the Inca empire in what is now
Ecuador and Peru are collapsed into a tight story framed by a prologue and
epilogue delivered by an impressive Jim Jorgensen whose strength has always
seemed to be his way with a monologue. In the prologue he promises an answer
to how 167 Spaniards prevailed over a nation of 24 million, but the play
never really gets into many of the forces involved. There's no mention of
the smallpox which the Spaniards carried which decimated the Incas. There's
only passing reference to the power of firearms that they also carried with
almost as much impact. Instead, author Peter Shaffer (Equus, Amadeus)
was much more interested in the conflict of cultures and he painted the
indigenous population as "noble savages" in contrast to the greed-driven
insensitive invaders.
The large cast provides an uneven
range of portrayals. James Foster, Jr. takes some time for his
performance as Pizarro to achieve much depth, but it ends up nicely tuned. In
keeping with Shaffer's view of events (at least as directed by Mazzola) the
real strength of the evening comes from the performance of Peter Pereyra as
the noble Atahuallpa. He could have gone overboard and made this into a
cartoon of a character, but instead, keeps it just human enough to be
touching. Unfortunately, Daniel Ladmirault found no such boundary and
takes his performance as the cruel piety-spouting priest to over-simplified
extremes. Of particular note is the work of Matt Mezzacappa as the young
page to Pizarro. His part calls for him to listen to others quite a lot
which is never an easy thing for an actor to do without causing distractions.
He does this well,
and yet he switches with ease to scenes where he must be more active.
There are impressive contributions
from the off-stage creative team as well. Mariano Vales has composed a
compelling score giving distinct feelings to the scenes involving native and
invading people. Matthew Soule is very inventive within the constraints of
his set design budget, using a length of tapestry that unrolls to present
different backgrounds and a shimmering gold curtain for the mounting ransom.
The cumulative effect of the visual and sonic designs is to focus attention
on the content of the play rather than distract with spectacle. Hardly
Hollywood's approach to an epic - but a very good one for this company and the
Clark Street Playhouse.
Written by Peter Shaffer. Directed
by Steven Scott Mazzola. Original music composed by Mariano Vales.
Choreography by Krissie Marty. Fight choreography by John Gurski. Design: Matthew Soule (set) Cynthia Abel Thom (costumes) Eleanor
Gomberg (properties) Ayun Fedorcha (lights) Matthew Nielson (sound) Ray
Gniewek (photography) Karen Currie (stage manager). Cast: William Aitken,
Leslie Sarah Cohen, Brian Crane, Edward Daniels, James Foster, Jr., Chris
Galindo, Theo Hadjimichael, Katherine E. Hill, Jim Jorgensen, Daniel
Ladmirault, Steve Lee, Matt Mezzacappa, Peter Pereyra, Alex Perez, Francisco
Reinoso, Beth Madeline Rubens, Nick Scott, Michael Sherman, Addison Swtizer,
Shane Wallis. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 2
- July 3,
2005
Medea |
Reviewed June 7|
Running time 1:45 no intermission
A stylish staging of a classic |
Jose Carrasquillo and Paul MacWhorter re-unite as co-directors to take on a
play that has maintained the power to fascinate for some 2,500 years. While
their staging isn't an attempt to re-create classic Greek tragedy with its
masks, togas, staid postures and the like, it isn't a contemporary
take either. It aims for a timelessness, delving into emotions and
motivations and making no effort to turn them into some fashion of the day.
The result is a satisfying and at times fascinating presentation, which, for
all its flair and despite some very solid performances, refuses to ignite
with the impact the final terrible acts should have.
Storyline: Medea, a former princess, has abandoned her
homeland to marry Jason of Argonaut fame who she helped steal her country's
proudest possession, the fabled golden fleece. Now, after she has borne his
children, he has cast her off in favor of another. She takes awful
vengeance, causing the death of her rival. She knows she will pay for the
crime but is much more concerned that the children she had with Jason will
be the targets of revenge. To prevent that she slays them herself.
When the title of a tragedy by Euripides is a
character's name you can be sure it is a part with enough meat on it to fill
the house with sorrow. Right now we have two examples on display in the
Potomac Region, Vanessa Redgrave is holding forth in Hecuba just across the
river at the Kennedy Center, while Delia Taylor is Medea here in Arlington.
(Seeing both shows can be something of an over-dose of dead children!)
Taylor can be searing in her anguish and she can be incredibly intense. Both
skills serve her well here. Whether hers or her directors' choice, the Medea
she creates seems less royal and therefore less regal than might be expected
of a former princess brought to Greece in glory before being wronged. The
result is more an "everywoman" approach that concentrates on the motivation
for the slaying of her own children as protection rather than revenge.
Carrasquillo and MacWhorter, along with set designer
Giorgos Tsappas, create a striking environment for the tragedy, a circular
platform suggesting, but not quite imitating, the central playing space of a
classic Greek theater. Here, however, the platform is a subdued blood red
and contains a sand-filled pit which could be a sand box for the kids, a pit
for blood sports or a piece of the desert removed from civilization to which
Medea's plight condemns her. It is all those things and more. An inspired
piece of staging is the use of Marie Schneggenburger's puppets - dolls,
really - for the children. Their presence, either on the side of the
platform observing the actions of the grownups or in the arms of their tutor
played with touching honesty by Richard Mancini, gives a focus to the
impending horror that permeates the piece.
Each of the players work as part of the Greek Chorus
as well as taking on named roles and each adds another layer to the texture
of the piece. Kathleen Akerley adds a strength,
Christopher Henley an otherworldliness and Alexander Strain a touch of
intrigue, while Jenifer Deal, who is cross-cast as Jason, gets a chance to
sink her teeth into another meaty part. Only Debbie Minter Jackson, as one
of the women of the court, seems to have nothing much to add beyond the
scope of her role as a woman of the court. However, they all contribute to the
haunting sound of the production as the chorus whispers, hums and cries in a
most otherworldly manner, creating a score that is neither music nor
electronic effect but becomes the very atmosphere of the world in which the
play plays out.
Written by Euripides. Translated by Alistair Elliot.
Adapted and directed by Jose Carrasquillo and Paul MacWhorter. Design:
Giorgos Tsappas (set) Melanie Clark (costumes) Marie Schneggenburger
(puppets) Ayun Fedorcha (lights) Ray Gniewek (photography) Meg Taintor
(stage manager). Cast: Kathleen Akerley, Jenifer Deal, Christopher Henley,
Debbie Minter Jackson, Richard Mancini, Alexander Strain, Delia Taylor.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
March 3
- April 3,
2005
The
Milk Train Doesn't Stop Here Anymore |
Reviewed March 8
Running time 2:50 - one intermission
General admission seating
Brief nudity viewed from behind
Click here to buy the script |
Two years ago this company mounted Tennessee Williams'
The Night of the Iguana in a
production noteworthy for its atmosphere of decadence and decay as well as
for the performance of Christopher Henley. Now the company turns to a rarely
performed Williams play and Henley switches from performer to director. This
time it doesn't work as well, as the production fails to create any real
atmosphere at all. Perhaps that is a reflection of the script's lack of
consistency and atmospheric balance. Henley tries to get things moving,
through the now-overused device of having an actor portraying Williams
himself appearing to narrate using the stage directions from the script, the
piece begins to feel academic, as if being put before you to be studied
instead of experienced.
Storyline: On a hilltop overlooking Italy's Divina Costiera, a dying
elderly woman is visited by a mysterious man with a history of approaching
wealthy dying elderly women. His presence stimulates her to contemplate her
life but that hardly seems necessary since she happens to be dictating her
memoirs to her secretary.
Perhaps the absence of
satisfying atmosphere and narrative clarity in this production shouldn't be
judged too harshly. After all, the play was a failure both times it was
attempted on Broadway. Today it is better known for the casts that have
performed it than for its own quality. The aging woman was briefly a role
for Tallulah Bankhead on stage (with Tab Hunter as the enigmatic stranger)
and later in a movie (titled "Boom!") for Elizabeth Taylor with Richard
Burton. Henley has a haughty Annie Houston paired with a mysterious Hough T.
Owen voicing Williams' sometimes inscrutable dialogue.
Physically, this production
seems rather disjointed with a number of different set areas in the spacious
Clark Street Playhouse. One of those areas is the writing room of "TW"
played by Steve Wilhite, who sets the scene in stage directions and then
follows the events in the draft as if giving one final read to his creation
before sending it off to wherever famous playwrights send their scripts.
He's so far to the rear of the playing space, however, that his voice
becomes echoey and difficult to follow.
Houston gives the role of
the dying woman a stately presence and Owen seems comfortable with the
inscrutable. Suzanne Richard makes an impression as "The Witch of Capri" but
the meaning of her presence is rarely clear. Marybeth Fritzky seems the only
really normal person in the collection as the old lady's secretary. Williams
experimented with many theatrical traditions in assembling this play,
including Japanese kabuki represented by two stage assistants that scamper
around in their black robes with red fans. With such disparate elements in
Williams' creation it is no wonder that this production can't establish a
consistent feel.
Written by Tennessee
Williams. Directed by Christopher Henley. Design: Eric Grims (set) Melanie
Clark (costumes) Heidi Volf (properties) Jason Arnold (lights) David Lamont
Wilson (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Laura Rozmeski (stage manager).
Cast: Marybeth Fritzky, Chris Galindo, Jay Hardee, Annie Houston, Hugh T.
Owen, Suzanne Richard, Alexander Strain, Heidi Volf, Steve Wilhite, Katrina
Wiskup.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 11 - December 31,
2004
Titus
Andronicus |
Reviewed November 16
Running time 2:30 - one intermission
Caution: strong themes and
nudity
Click here to buy the script
|
If slasher movies are your thing, you would do
well to make sure you see this production of Shakespeare's possibly ugliest
and certainly bloodiest play. The Washington Shakespeare Company does the
piece justice, giving its dramatic story a compelling recitation and
bringing most of the characters to well thought out life, clarifying their
motivations and making everything proceed in an understandable progression
of vengeful atrocities that escalates in a bloody contest of one-upsmanship.
It is made all the more horrendous because the victims - and here everyone
is a victim - are more than mere cartoon figures set up as targets for
inventive new ways to horrify, maim and kill. They are human beings about
whom you can care: not like, you understand, but care.
Storyline: A conquering general returning in triumph to Rome is immersed
in the politics of the empire in the wake of the death of the emperor. He is
proclaimed the new emperor but refuses the post, naming one of the former
emperor's sons in his stead, but unleashing a flood of jealousies that
involve his five remaining sons (he's already lost 21 in wars!), his
daughter, the family of the late emperor and the queen of the land he
conquered whom he has brought home in chains along with her entire family.
Each act of violence begets another, gorier and more inventive atrocity, an escalation that includes rape, maiming, mayhem, torture, disfigurement
and cannibalism.
You know you're in
for an evening of ugly things early on when the on-stage toilet is
simultaneously used for its biological function and for a forced head
dipping, but unless you've read the script, seen the movie (Julie Taymor
made a movie of the play which is nothing like The Lion King) or
attended the rock musical version by Shawn Northrip that played at Source a
few years ago, you won't be prepared for the ugliness of the horrors
committed in this exploration of just how inhuman humans can get.
Shakespeare was quite inventive in his visions of revenge, but director Joe Banno adds a few inventive touches of his own. After all there were no
plastic and steel paper cutters available in 1591 when the young bard
(probably collaborating with another playwright) wrote the play based
perhaps in part on the vividly titled poem
"A Lamentable Ballad of the Tragical End of a Gallant Lord and of his
Beautiful Lady, With the Untimely Death of Their Children, Wickedly
Performed by a Heathen Blackamore, Their Servant: The Like Seldom Heard
Before." That sort of says it.
Banno assembles a large cast for the eighteen
named characters in this version. Returning to the Clark Street Playhouse in
the title role is Ian Armstrong who lacks the imposing stature and presence
the role calls for at the start. He looks more like a quartermaster than a
commanding General in his U.S. Army uniform in this production which is
presented as if in modern times. As the evening progresses (or is that
regresses?) Armstrong captures the character's descent into vengeful madness
quite well. He draws well-formed characterizations from Alexander Strain as
the late emperor's eldest son, and Arthur Rowan as his younger brother and John-Michael MacDonald as Titus' brother. The pack of sons, most fated to die
before the evening is out, along with those of of the conquered Queen of the goths (played with delightful menace by Rahaleh Nassri) feature fine work by
the likes of Jon Reynolds, Cesar A. Guadamuz and Chris Galindo. Young
Brandon Thane Wilson continues to impress, this time in the dual roles of
Titus' youngest son and the queen's own ill-fated offspring. The most
ill-fated of all, however, is Titus' daughter Lavinia. Kate Siegelbaum
manages to keep the character human throughout the most vile abuse - she's
the one who's raped, has her hands and her tongue cut out and is left
naked and bleeding to be discovered by her family.
Set designer Matt Soule has done striking
work here, creating a dozen different playing spaces around the perimeter of
Clark Street's large playhouse with the audience dispersed between them.
Across the center space he has created an elevated runway that serves as
everything from debate platform for the Roman process of selecting a new
emperor to banquet table where the ultimate feast of vengeance is served.
Such a sprawling assemblage of settings is a challenge for any lighting
designer. Marianne Meadows rises to that challenge not just managing to make
the areas visible but creating an atmosphere for each that increases the
impact of the scenes. There is a great deal of quality work to be enjoyed
here by anyone who thinks they can stomach the gore.
Written by William Shakespeare. Directed by
Joe Banno. Design: Matt Soule (set) Melanie Clark (costumes) Rebecca Trotter
(properties) Arthur Rowan (fight choreography) Marianne Meadows (lights)
David Lamont Wilson (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Karen Currie (stage
manager). Cast: Ian Armstrong, Chris Galindo, Daniel Eichner, Cesar A.
Guadamuz, Jay Hardee, John-Michael MacDonald, Eric Messner, Rahaleh Nassri,
Jon Reynolds, Suzanne Richard, Arthur Rowan, Kate Siegelbaum, Alexander
Strain, Brandon Thane Wilson, David Lamont Wilson. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
August
5 - September 5, 2004
The
Tempest |
Reviewed August 10
Running time 2:50 - one intermission
Click here to buy the script |
Christopher Henley directs Shakespeare’s last play, the fantasy-romance
which seems to attract directors and designers with a keen eye for stage
pictures. Henley certainly puts a premium on the visual elements of the
production, although, with a cast this strong, neither the text nor the
characters are shorted. However, time and again throughout the rather
lengthy evening, the audience's focus is pulled away from either an
important event for the plot or a particularly pertinent piece of dialogue
by a distracting activity. The vast playing space of the Clark Street
Playhouse is set up with audience on three sides of the former
warehouse which requires constant attention to blocking to avoid giving
anyone in the audience the impression they are watching from behind the
action. Henley does a credible job of this. Only in one scene, when Jenifer Deal is center stage emoting from a platform, does it appear that a
character is rotating simply to accommodate the shape of the house.
Storyline: Deposed Duke Prospero, abandoned on a desert island lo these
dozen years, sees his opportunity for justice when his usurper passes by in
a ship. Prospero, who has used his time studying sorcery, conjures up a
fierce storm during which his usurper's party abandons their foundering ship and
washes up on his island. Prospero's daughter falls in love with the usurper's
son. The usurper
and his entourage get involved in many schemes as Prospero's revenge
proceeds, but all are reconciled through the love of parents for children and
children for each other.
Jenifer Deal is this production's Prospero.
This gender switch is of no consequence at all and it allows Deal the
opportunity to sink her teeth into a meaty role with gusto. She plays this
deposed duke as a blind sorcerer with a towering dignity and a sense of
assurance that dominates the play even when she's off stage. Other
gender switches among the cast such as Meg Taintor as Prospero's brother
(sister?), Antonio, seem less natural.
Supporting Deal are some standout performers,
Scott Kerns, Daniel Ladmirault, Chris Galindo and Saskia de Vriesto to
name but a few. Kerns is a delight to watch as the "airy spirit" Ariel whose
presence emphasizes the magic of the fantasy. He's accompanied by Regina
Aquino and John Reynolds as companion spirits, with Aquino in red and Reynolds
in blue contrasting with Kerns white outfit. These two also play the ships'
crew and Reynolds is particularly good at rendering the bard's iambic
pentameter in the guttural accent of so many pirate movies. Ladmirault
displays a gift for emphasizing the word play of Shakespeare's text while
scampering about as a sly slave. Galindo and de Vries make an appealing pair
of young lovers capturing the essence of just why this pair has been one of
the most popular of Shakespeare's many pairs of infatuated youngsters. de
Vries' instantaneous reaction to the sight of the first male of her own age
she had ever seen is innocence personified.
As with most of his later works, Shakespeare
blends many subplots and subsidiary characters into a heady brew with
fathers and their children, dukes and kings, councilors and butlers, slaves,
sprites and spirits. Many directors rely on their design team to help keep
it all straight with different color schemes or patterns for different
elements. In this production, however, there seems to be no discernable
scheme. Instead there is an overall look that emphasizes the fantasy nature
of the story without subdivisions or even a consistency of time period.
Kerns' silver sneakers, Galindo's undershirt, Ladmirault's Caribbean skirt,
Joe Baker's tropical shirt - none of these seem to identify thematic
threads. Still, the visual impact of the show is a satisfying one,
especially David C. Ghatan's effective lighting of his own set design.
Written by William Shakespeare. Directed by
Christopher Henley. Design: David C. Ghatan (set and lights) William Fisher
(costumes) Kim Deane (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Elizabeth Welke (stage manager). Cast: Regina
Aquino, Joe Baker, Jenifer Deal, Saskia de Vries, Chris Galindo, Cesar A.
Guadamuz, Scott Kerns, Daniel Ladmirault, Monique LaForce, Paul McLane, Anne
Nottage, Jon Reynolds, Alexander Strain, Meg Taintor, Genevieve Williams,
Katrina Wiskup. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
April 15 - May
22, 2004
Waiting for Godot |
Reviewed May 6
Running time 2 hours 25 minutes
t A Potomac
Stages Pick for three superb performances |
This is probably the finest production of this
important and highly entertaining play you will have the opportunity to see
for quite a long time. Dorothy Neumann has returned to direct the play as
she did with this company in 1994. She has two of her original cast members, Brian Hemmingsen and Richard Mancini,
as well as Christopher Henley, Bruce Britton
and Peter Pereyra. (Joe Baker will take over for Pereyra this weekend.) The team of Hemmingsen and Henley comes across as a
perfect pair for this absurdist classic, combining comedy that induces as
many smiles as outright laughs with an underlying humanity that is warm and
welcoming. The play is now running in repertory
with Lady Chatterley's Lover.
Storyline: Two befuddled characters wait for
the arrival of a mysterious person. Their lives don't seem to have much
purpose but they seem to believe that this Mr. Godot will provide answers to
what they should be doing and why. In the meantime, they try to find ways to
fill their day. The monotony is broken by a chance encounter with a stranger
and his servant or slave. When a messenger delivers the word that Mr. Godot
won't be coming today, all they have to do is wait for tomorrow.
Henley and Hemmingsen start out as something of
a Laurel and Hardy team with Hemmingsen giving the Hardy role a touch of
pathos and Henley orbiting him in precise movements and manners. But as the
evening proceeds, Hemmingsen deepens the character and Henley approaches a
Chaplinesque comedy of posture, movement and mannerism that is captivating.
Each is a delight on his own - witness Henley scratching his chin in thought
or Hemmingsen tumbling about in an effort to take off a shoe -- but as a team
they amplify each other's strengths gloriously. From the lightning timing of
challenges and retorts to slapstick routines like the exchange of derbies
that gives new meaning to the term "hat trick" this is an act not to be
missed.
Richard Mancini is also very impressive as
the servant/slave with the ironic name of "Lucky." His is a part that
requires him to be mute and to approach a standing comatose state, calling
for a mime-like first half. But his character is energized by another bit
with a hat and, suddenly, the cast can't shut him up. Few roles in the
standard literature call for such an abrupt and complete change and Mancini
not only turns it on and off with precision, he sets it up so well with his
early struggle just to stay on his feet that it is all the more effective.
Steve Wilhite, on the other hand, doesn't quite find the tone for his part
of the strange visitor until well into the play.
The "action" of this play famous for the
absence of meaningful action takes place on a nicely abstract set consisting
of a circular platform with two ramps, a partition and a single tree
designed by Misha Kachman in highly theatrical style. Painted a splotchy
gray-white, the entire space takes on a look reminiscent of faded white-face
makeup -- just the right look for this piece of whimsy with substance.
Written by Samuel Beckett. Directed by Dorothy
Neumann. Design: Misha Kachman (set) Howard Vincent Kurtz (costumes)
Katherine Osborn (properties) David Paige (lights) David Maddox (sound) Kathleen Akerley (stage manager).
Cast: Brian Hemmingsen, Christopher Henley, Richard Mancini, Peter Pereyra,
Steve Wilhite. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
February 25 - March 21, 2004
Deathwatch |
Reviewed March 7
Running time 1 hour 35 minutes
Mature content and brief nudity
Performed at The Warehouse Theater
Joint Production with Actors Theatre of
Washngton
t A Potomac Stages Pick for
extraordinary staging and emotional intensity
|
Difficult to witness and emotionally draining, this superb presentation of a
classic of the avant-garde of a few generations ago is distinguished by
three exceptionally intelligent performances, a sharp interpretation by
co-directors Lee Mikeska Gardner and Matty Griffiths, and a fabulous set design in a challenging
space. Jean Genet, precursor of the beat generation, penned this portrait of
prison life in 1942 while he was himself in prison - - an environment not
unknown to him as he spent much of his youth in institutions of various
kinds. His portrait of the dynamics among cellmates is extremely disturbing
and this production holds nothing back in bringing it to life.
Storyline: Three men share a prison cell as one awaits execution, one awaits
release and one avoids contemplating a future exposed to the dangers outside
their cell.
The confining space of
the tiny back room adjacent to the Warehouse Theater on 7th Street NW has
had only a few productions to date but it is hard to imagine how another
scenic designer could use the space better. A prison cell is a space defined
by four walls. Here all four are created, the one between the audience and
the cell being a semi-transparent scrim which doesn't distance you from the
environment but, rather, accentuates the confinement of the prisoners.
Lit with unforgiving neon as well as more traditional theatrical equipment,
the space is a concrete box containing human beings which is further defined
by a jagged row of concrete blocks which John Francis Bauer as the guard
paces across in a haunting slow-motion. Images are projected onto the scrim
which amplify and comment on some points in the play but, sitting on the
right side of the house, they were obscured to my view by the lights inside
the playing space. An equally disturbing soundscape accentuates the
harshness of this world.
Gardner uses the space with claustrophobic
passion, with the prisoners retreating to corners or gathering in groupings
center stage. The prisoners taunt each other from the sides, approach each
other in the middle in anger or friendship, form alliances down stage,
gratify each other in common spaces or challenge each other up stage.
Gardner and Griffiths open the performance with a series of tableaus of
prison life separated by
intensely dark blackouts - prisoners playing checkers,
prisoners exercising, prisoners sleeping and, yes, prisoners having sex with
each other. By the time the first word is spoken, not only do you know what
this world is like, you know a good deal about the dynamics of the
interrelationship between these three prisoners who share this particular
cell.
These prisoners are sharply defined
characters, each given memorable portrayals by this superb cast. Peter Klaus
is the dominating force, a murderer called "Green Eyes" who is awaiting
execution by guillotine. He is steely in a way that makes clear how he
clings to his strength for fear of cracking into tiny pieces if he allows
even one moment of weakness. Jeffrey Johnson is the submissive, manipulative
prisoner panicked by the impending absence through execution of his former
protector. Christopher Henley is the newest cellmate, one who has been
placed in the cell only temporarily as he is slated for release in a few
days. He's the game player, taking care not to overstep his bounds so far
that he wouldn't survive to his release date, but enjoying the final
opportunity to play with the minds of his new cellmates. Their world is
compelling, frightening and immediate.
Written by Jean Genet. Directed by Lee
Mikeska Gardner and Matty Griffiths. Design: Kim Deane (set) Michele Reisch
(costumes) Matty Griffiths and Maxwell Hessman (projections) Marianne
Meadows (lights) David Crandall (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Maxwell
Hessman (stage manager). Cast: John Francis Bauer, Christopher Henley,
Jeffrey Johnson, Peter Klauss.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
January 2 - February 7, 2004
Jumpers |
Reviewed January 8
Mature Material -
Nudity
Running time 2 hours 45 minutes |
There’s the professor who never stops talking, the secretary who never
starts talking, the wife who never stops seducing, the bumbling detective
who never spots a clue and the smooth talking college department chairman
who never misses a beat, not to mention television coverage of the first
fisticuffs between astronauts on the moon. It all adds up to a three ring
circus and, just in case you miss the metaphor, there are acrobats -- kind
of. Mr. Barnum and Mr. Bailey -- or at least their contemporaries a century
ago, knew the trick of balancing competing acts to capture and hold the
attention of an audience. Playwright Tom Stoppard challenges a director to
master that trick in this thoroughly confusing mélange. Unfortunately,
director Kathleen Akerley doesn’t succeed in highlighting the important and
interesting while diverting attention from the mundane. As a result, the
circus act becomes tedious despite some good individual elements.
Storyline: A college professor is dictating a scholarly work on the nature
of God (titled “Is God?”) while his wife is absorbed in a series of
encounters with a succession of visitors beginning with a member of a
visiting acrobatic troupe (don’t ask) who is killed. The detective on the
case is oblivious to much of what is going on and the professor’s superior
at his college attempts to divert any attention that might embarrass the
institution.
At
the heart of any Stoppard play is language, and Akerley has long had a
fascination for that aspect of his output. Her work on Rosencrantz &
Guildenstern Are Dead and Doggs’ Hamlet/Cahoot’s Macbeth
concentrated on the verbal at the expense of the visual. Here she has a
great deal of visual material to play with but her focus stays on the words
which puts a heavy burden on David Bryan Jackson as the philosophy spouting
professor. His ruminations on essential questions of existence might well
work as background for the action of the play but when the spotlight is
unwavering on his musings about the meaning of the phrase “this is a good
bacon sandwich” the humor is killed by the earnestness.
In
such a staging, smaller roles tend to shine and here two performances do
just that. Chris Davenport is delightfully clueless, he plays
the detective role as a British version of Inspector Clouseau caught in a
Monty Python world. Christopher Henley is similarly delightful in a smarmy
way as a the college department head who tries to smooth over every problem
with the oil of eloquence.
Jared
Davis has designed a set that provides room for all three - and perhaps four
- rings of this circus although just why one section needs to slide out of
the way for a climax no more impressive than the opening is not quite clear.
Mark Casale has provided a video package that turns the moon and the
visiting astronauts into a match for both circus rings and more cosmopolitan
entertainments.
Written by Tom Stoppard.
Directed by Kathleen Akerley. Design: Jared Davis (set) Michele Reisch
(costumes) Dayana Yochim (properties) Adam Magazine (lights) Mark Casale
(video) Richard Renfield (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Kurt Hall (stage
manager). Cast: Rick Andersen, Jessica Browne-White, Chris Davenport, Jeanne
Dillon, Marybeth Fritzky, Chris Galindo, Scott Graham, Christopher Henley,
David Bryan Jackson, Adrienne Nelson, Shawn Northrip, Steven Perry.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
September 18 - October 25, 2003
Scaramouche |
Reviewed October 3
Running time 2 hours 45 minutes |
Thanks to the well modulated performance of Hugh T. Owen as the
swashbuckling hero, the
stage version of the run-of-the-mill French-Revolution 1921 romance novel
rises above its source material and delivers a show that gets better as it
goes along. The key to the improvement is the fact that the hero starts out
as a fairly boring, callow youth but he matures and develops before your
eyes. When was the last time you noticed that Superman was more mature than Superboy? The youth from Krypton never seemed to learn from his adventures.
Owen’s “Scaramouche” does, and that is the secret of keeping the audience
intrigued over the course of an otherwise rather rambling evening.
Storyline: A young
orphan in the French provinces in the years leading up to the French
Revolution sees his friend murdered by a member of the ruling class. He
flees his home in Brittany by joining a troupe of commedia dell’arte
performers, gaining the nickname of the character he played in their
performances, Scaramouche. He finds his bearings in Paris where he becomes a
leader in the political circles of the French Revolution. His drive for
vengeance for the injustices of the ruling class tears the mask from the
secret of his birth.
Field, whose stage
adaptation of the Frankenstein tale was on the Washington Shakespeare
Company’s schedule a decade ago, has adapted this novel with an episodic
approach.
Reducing a novel to a less-than-three-hour span is always a challenge. Here,
with a story that made a virtue out of switching locales and building to
false climaxes, it is rather remarkable that a coherent storyline was
developed. But the piece holds together through it all.
Director Gregg Henry keeps the focus on the story, avoiding temptations to
linger for stage pictures or effects. These temptations must have been
great, for the story includes commedia dell’arte performances, fencing
expositions, revolutionary uprisings and all the other accoutrements of a
classic French Revolution novel. But, rather than compete with the images in
the musical version of the greatest of all French Revolution novels, Victor
Hugo’s Les Misérables, Henry tries to set the story in a more human
scale. He can’t quite resist the temptation to have the students wave
banners on their way to the barricades, but, for the most part, he keeps
strictly to the needs of the story. Still, Field's book has the French
national anthem, The Mareillaise being sung so he had to include that.
As if
to compensate for the spareness of the visual staging, sound designer Mark
K. Anduss provides a score of lush orchestral works that would have pleased
Franz Waxman or Max Steiner who scored some of Hollywood’s great costume
spectacles. There is no particular credit for fencing master so one must
assume that Fight Choreographer John Gurski and Fight Captain Scott Kerns
should receive the credit for the fact that the eight or nine cast members
who wield a rapier seem to have the appropriate level of skill for their
parts. Nothing can bring down a swashbuckler faster than a swishy swash but
every one of these fencers know their stuff, especially Ian Armstrong and
the hero Hugh T. Owen.
Written by Barbara Field based on the novel by Rafael Sabatini. Directed by
Gregg Henry. Commedia Dell’Arte sequences directed by Grady Weatherford.
Design: Matt Soule (set) Kathleen Geldard (costumes) Suzen Mason
(properties) John Gursky (fight choreography) Scott Kerns (fight captain)
Lynn Joslin (lights) Mark K. Anduss (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography) Kurt
Hall (stage manager). Cast: Ian Armstrong, Jenifer Deal, Chris Galindo,
Cesar A. Guadamuz, Scott Kerns, Daniel Ladmirault, Eco Lopez, Joe Mancuso,
Hugh T. Owen, Chance Parker, Ian Blackwell Rogers, Laurie Sherman, Meg
Taintor, Grady Weatherford.
|
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
June 26 – August 24, 2003
The Night of the Iguana |
Reviewed
August 16
Running time 2 hours 55 minutes
t
Potomac Stages Pick |
Any competent production of any Tennessee Williams play is worth catching,
and there will be many opportunities to sample his impressive output over
the upcoming season as the Kennedy Center mounts its Williams Celebration
and other theaters add to the Williams mania. The Washington Shakespeare
Company simply gets the jump on the rest with their more than competent
mounting of this poetic atmosphere piece. But there is a special reason to
make sure this is one of the Williams shows you see during the year - the
performance of Christopher Henley in the leading role. It is fortunate that
two performances have been added for those who missed the regular run. The
show will play its final performances Saturday and Sunday, August 23-24 at 8
pm.
Storyline: A former
priest reduced to the status of a tour guide in a dilapidated area of Mexico
in 1944 brings his charges to a lovely but run-down resort hotel on a bluff
over the ocean, not because it is on the itinerary, for it isn’t, but
because he simply can’t go on shepherding this new kind of flock through the
ugliness of the world down below.
Henley has turned in some extraordinary performances over his years at the
Washington Shakespeare Company which he helped form in 1990. He has twice
been nominated for Helen Hayes awards for work here (Bent and
Entertaining Mr. Sloane) and his work in Marat/Sade and Tiny
Alice was notable.
This
time out he strides on stage as a man already at the end of his rope with
such assurance and dominates so completely as he disintegrates over the
length of a lengthy play that it is remarkable that he doesn’t unbalance the
production. But the play allows for such a bravura performance and his
intensity is well matched by the rest of the cast, especially the two
principal women in the piece, Cam Magee and Delia Taylor.
Michael Kachman’s evocative set design, using filmy fabric loosely draped to
suggest rather than represent walls, creates an openness just right for this
atmospheric piece. It does, however, accentuate the cavernous nature of this
black-box’s space. The echo-ey space requires intensive listening on the
part of the audience, but Williams’ poetic dialogue rewards the effort. The
night we attended there was a strange flickering in the lighting which may
not have been designer Gretta Daughtrey’s intention but, given the impending
storm that plays in the story, seemed to fit. Richard Renfield’s extensive
underscoring added to the mood.
Written by Tennessee Williams. Directed by H Lee Gable. Design: Michael
Kachman (set) Melanie Clark (costumes) Delia Taylor (properties) Gretta
Daughtrey (lighting) Richard Renfield (sound) Ray Gniewek (photography)
Tricia Craig (stage manager). Cast: Barry Abrams, John F. Bauer, Kerrie
Brown, Chris Galindo, Christopher Henley, Annie Houston, Cam Magee, Paul
MacWhorter, Tim Prestridge, Delia Taylor, Richard Wilt. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
July 10 - August 15, 2003
Lady
Chatterley's Lover |
Running time 2 hours 50 minutes
t
Potomac Stages Pick |
We regret that this review comes so late in the run of this fabulous
production, for our readers would have benefited from more notice. But the
night we were originally scheduled to review the show, the performance was
cancelled and this was the first opportunity we had to return to the Clark
Street Playhouse to catch the show. What we found was a sold-out Saturday
afternoon matinee that ended in the kind of ovation that signals real
appreciation. Most of the audience kept their seats while applauding
vigorously with sincere appreciation - a marked contrast to the standing
ovations that often seem to be more about the audience convincing themselves
that they had gotten their money’s worth than about expressing gratitude to
the players who had just spent three hours giving of their emotions and
talents to create the magic that is live theater.
Storyline: An English gentleman whose war injuries left him wheelchair bound
and incapable of sexual function urges his young wife to conceive a child
discretely in the hopes of having an heir. Sex was not a big thing between
them before he went off to war and she is, while not physically a virgin,
emotionally unawakened. She seduces the gamekeeper on their estate but
attraction turns to emotional involvement and she is unable to keep their
relationship under wraps or under control.
D. H.
Lawrence’s “Lady Chatterley’s Lover” was a novel for adults that became
fodder for adolescents more interested in its frank portrayal of sexuality
than its insights into the human psyche. This stage adaptation of the novel
by Mary Machala and John Vreeke is similarly a work for adults interested in
a probing look at human interaction presented in compelling theatricality.
It also has frankly sexual material and even a good deal of explicit nudity,
but - as in the book - it is in the service of a story worth telling rather
than being the reason the story is being told. As staged under the direction
of co-adaptor Vreeke, the openness of naked activity is saved until late in
the relationship when passion has deepened and sexual activity is more about
joy and ecstasy and less about lust or conquest, making the lengthy nude
scene a thing of beauty and not a voyeur’s titillation.
As in
the novel, the play is more about Lady Chatterley than her lover. In
Michelle Shupe’s hands, the Lady transforms before our eyes from an innocent
girl eager to please those around her from her father to her husband, to an
emotionally self-aware woman who meets the challenges of life with a mature
sense of balance. She is flanked by a well matched pair of supporting men,
Jim Jorgensen as her husband who can’t comprehend the depth of attachment
two people can develop out of the effect of intimacy and Hugh T. Owen as the
gamekeeper whose own self control is sufficient to protect him from any
emotional danger but the attraction of this one woman. Together, they make
an imposing triangle of interrelated psychological challenges.
Vreeke and Machala’s adaptation uses a uniquely theatrical voice for the
work, with each actor delivering both the words spoken by their character
and the narrative descriptions of their appearance and actions drawn from
the novel’s third-person narration. (Those familiar with the voicings of
characters in Ragtime (Father: “Father was well off.” Mother: “Mother
often told herself how fortunate she was to be so protected.”) will
recognize the technique. It not only delivers important information to the
audience efficiently, it helps flesh out the supporting characters quickly
and clearly in the hands of gifted performers Daniel Ladmirault, Charlotte
Akin and Nanna Ingvarsson who handle all the rest of the roles. This allows
the show to proceed through a great deal of story in almost fast-forward
speed, setting up a contrasting near-slow-motion effect for key scenes
between the lady and her lover. This varied ride is well worth taking if you
can get there for one of the two remaining performances on the schedule -
Thursday and Friday of this week.
Written by Mary Machala
and John Vreeke. Adapted from the novel by D. H. Lawrence. Directed by John
Vreeke. Design: Michael Kachman (set) Michele Reisch (costumes) Delia Taylor
(properties) Gretta Daughtrey (lights) Mark K. Anduss and John Vreeke
(sound). Cast: Charlotte Akin, Nanna Ingvarsson, Jim Jorgensen, Daniel
Ladmirault, Hugh T. Owen, Michelle Shupe. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
March 13 – April 26, 2003
Henry V |
Reviewed March 18
Running time 3 hours 10 minutes |
Director David Bryan Jackson certainly believes that his approach to
Shakespeare’s history play about a ruler who goes to war, in part over
grievances inherited from his father’s regime, has relevance in the week
America went to war against Iraq under George W. Bush twelve years after the
Gulf War led by his father. If you don’t get the reference from the text, he
uses “Director’s Notes” in the program to quote from both the Bard and the
President and then throws in at least one gratuitous reminder in the play.
But for theatrical commentary on contemporary affairs to work, it first must
be effective theater. Sadly, that is what this “V” is missing.
Storyline: A young King
of England, having inherited a long standing quarrel with neighboring France
from his father’s regime, invades across the channel. On the eve of battle,
he disguises himself as a commoner and goes among his troops to learn first
hand what conditions are and then uses that knowledge to strike the right
note in leading them to a victory that is more difficult to achieve than his
advisors would lead him to believe.
Shakespeare’s play may be a sprawling thing, but Jackson doesn’t enjoy the
resources to create an epic on stage. Instead, he fields a cast of one dozen
to portray the three dozen or so characters in the text. Some of them are
good and some of them are not. Among the best is Karl Miller who brings the
young king to life for a number of scenes but frequently seems to be playing
against other performers who have little life in their characters.
The
task of most of the rest of the cast is to find ways to give separate
characters separate identities. Suzanne Richard succeeds handsomely as she
brings a number of smaller parts to life and each is a definable, separate,
memorable person. Others like Dan Brick and Valerie Fenton do well with one
part but seem to get lost in the ensemble for others. Unfortunately, most of
the rest of the cast spend the evening confusing the matter rather than
clarifying the play.
Jackson uses a single playing space with angular boxes shoved into multiple
configurations to represent the many locations in the text and simple
costume additions such as a cloak or a crown to represent many different
characters. The boxes don’t seem to add up to anything, however, and many of
the costume clues are so generic that it frequently takes a major part of a
scene to figure out just who these characters are and where the action is
set. The use of hobbyhorses for mounted soldiers is always a tricky thing on
stage for it is difficult not to look ridiculous prancing about the stage on
a stick. This cast doesn’t manage to pull of that trick.
Written by William
Shakespeare. Directed by David Bryan Jackson. Fight choreography by
Christopher Niebling. Design: Kim Deane (set) Michele Reisch (costumes) Lynnie
Raybuck (puppets/masks/props) Don Slater (lights) Ray Gniewek (photography)
David Bryan Jackson (sound) Susie Pamudji (stage manager). Cast: Karl
Miller, Suzanne Richard, Dan Brick, Valerie Fenton, Eric Schoen, Scott
McCormick, Phil Bolin, Nicholas Jackson, Hugh T. Owen, Annie Houston, Tara
Giordano, Phil Bolin. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
January 22
– February 26, 2003
A
Walk Across the Rooftops |
Reviewed by guest reviewer Michael Canning
Movie Reviewer for The Hill Rag
February 5, 2003
Running time 2 hours 15 min |
Chris Stezin and LB Hamilton, writer and director, respectively, of A
Walk Across the Rooftops, now at Washington Shakespeare Company, have
indicated that their new play is inspired by film noir, the French film
critics’ term for Hollywood movies of the bleak, hardboiled sort produced in
the 1940’s and 1950’s. While the drama pays some obeisance to that famous
film genre, awareness of it is hardly crucial to appreciate this complex
story of revenge and its effects. So noir-schwoir...forget about old movie
references, just let go, and take a walk across the rooftops. It’s not a
bad stroll.
Storyline: Three story threads coil and tighten around a central murder:
the disaffected Nick looks to leave his lover and seek vengeance for the
death of his father by assassinating his supposed killer, a mafioso in
Queens; a shady New York businessman hires a new personal assistant in part
to look after his firm’s lawyer and the businessman’s wife; and a young
woman in the city, seeking some kind of connection, encounters another
seeker, a young man from her building. All these lives come together with
Nick’s sniper shooting of his nemesis, an act which has grim consequences
for all, leading to both revelations and confusions.
As it
opens, A Walk Across the Rooftops evokes the film noir spirit nicely,
with an overvoice by chief protagonist Nick that “life is like a movie,” as
he drives through the night with a mystery woman at his side. It could be a
scene right out of a noir classic like Out of the Past (1947). Then,
to set up the dramatis personae, we ‘flash back” to a series of quick,
varied settings under harsh spots that recall the intercutting and
“establishing shots” of movie sequences. Other standard elements of the
genre are also present: a rumpled, asocial anti-hero, a flouncing femme
fatale -- along with a sweet young thing, the requisite corrupt boss, a
couple of stooges. Yet the creators of a walk across the rooftops perhaps
push the point too much, because there is much in the crowded plot which
does not resonate so much with film noir as with recent American theater
works. I felt more the literary echoes of Sam Shepard and John Guare than I
did of the tough talk of Raymond Chandler and Bogie, et al.
The
complexity of three story lines militates against an important trait of film
noir: one steady, even relentless, downward dynamic leading inevitably to a
brooding, exhausted conclusion. Little of that clear momentum is present
here, and what there is is sometimes stopped dead, as it does every time
Nick’s schlubby friend Ben engages in a monologue about his warped family
feeling or his dog. Also, the man and the woman on the rooftop, whom you
sense (and hope) will link up with the overall plot, end up in a world of
their own, one disconnected in subject and different in tone from the rest
of the drama. They seem like tentative lovers left over from a Clifford
Odets play of the mid-1930’s.
So
don’t worry about old movie references and get with the Mr. Stezin’s
program. The thrust of the story is mostly intriguing; you keep picking up,
in the second act, those threads that were gingerly dropped in the first,
and creating a pattern of your own. Performed on a set intended for another
play (Brendan Behan’s The Hostage which plays in rep in the same
Clark Street Playhouse), the multiple story lines are deftly choreographed
by director LB Hamilton with spotlights and minimal furniture -- and a cast
that can shift in character with simple shifts of a shoulder or an eyelid.
Dave Wright, for example, is able to morph from the morose carpenter Ben
into the dreaded DeFranco by merely putting on glasses and an attitude.
Daniel Ladmirault’s Nick is appropriately dour -- and doomed (as noir
dictates), and Bruce Alan Rauscher makes his flawed businessman both smart
and smarmy. The women in the cast (Elizabeth H. Richards and Aimee
Meher-Homji), unfortunately, have much less to do and rather stereotyped
ways to do it. Still, a walk across the rooftops, at its best, presents a
good yarn that keeps its feet on the ground.
Written by Chris Stezin. Directed by LB Hamilton. Original music by Adam K.
Hamiltorn. Design: Faz Besharatian and Mark Rhea (set) Tricia Craig and LB
Hamilton (costumes) Dan Martin (lights) Ray Gniewek (photography) by Ray
Ray . Cast: Dave Wright, Daniel Ladmirault, Bruce Alan Rauscher, Elizabeth
H. Richards, Aimee Meher-Homji, John Tweel, Carlos Bustamante , Patricia
Howard, John Horn. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 29, 2002 – January 4, 2003
A Midsummer Night’s Dream |
Reviewed December 2
Running time 2 hours 25 minutes |
My, they are having a grand time up there! A cast of eight expend a great
deal of energy creating the twenty-some characters of the Bard’s early
romantic comedy. By "early" is meant written some 407 years ago, well before
his more philosophical comedies that marked his late period. This one lacks
much of the polish of the later plays but those who treasure Shakespeare’s
quotable phrases and strongly conceived characters like this one a lot.
Storyline: A love triangle in the court of the Duke of Athens and the Duke’s
own matrimonial plans get completely bollixed up when magic potions, a
forest full of fairies and a wandering troupe of actors are added to the
mix. In the process Puck transforms Bottom into a donkey – don’t ask!
Director Lee Mikeska Gardner pulls out all the stops in an effort to
avoid a dull moment. Whimsical costuming, simple yet effective set changes
on an essentially bare playing platform, lovely lighting and a touch of
contemporary and seasonal music give the audience something to focus on
every minute. The cumulative effect of all the energy, however, is a bit
tiring in the first half and approaches exhaustion in the second while
making an already difficult to follow story all the more confusing to those
who don’t arrive with the synopsis in their head.
It takes a strong cast to pull off all the doubling up on roles without
creating complete confusion. These particular eight thespians are strong of
body as well as talent and manage to keep their own energy level up
throughout the evening. Suzanne Richard is perhaps the most dynamic dynamo
of the bunch, clowning and emoting her way through the entire first half.
She’s absent for a while after intermission. But, when she re-emerges, she
reestablishes her own level of mirth and augments that of the ensemble.
Gardner even tries to involve willing audience members in the revelry. If
you have a birthday or an anniversary or other significant evening you and
your spouse / partner / sibling / friend would like to celebrate by more
than just seeing a show, call the theater so they can schedule you in as the
royalty of the night. You’ll be seated in on-stage thrones and loaned crowns
for the evening. No participation in the play is required – unless you want
it. Then, they’d be happy to throw you a line or two.
Written by William Shakespeare. Directed by Lee Mikeska Gardner.
Assistant director Annie Houston. Design: Michael Kachman (set) Michele
Reisch (costumes) Marianne Meadows (lights) Richard Renfield (music). Cast:
Suzanne Richard, Grace Edoigbe, Ian Armstrong, Mike Goll, Nick Jackson, Jean
Miller, Raheleh Nassri, Barbara Papendorp. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
August 27 – September 23,
2002
The Maids |
Reviewed August 29
Running time 1 hour 30 minutes
Price $15 |
The commitment of a small cast makes a compelling experience out of a play
that breaks so many conventions it could be dismissed as too confusing or
too bizarre in less assured hands. This one act, five segment play by
avant-garde writer Jean Genet was written just after World War II in Paris
and established his reputation in the post war artistic movement that gave
the world be-bop and word-jazz. It was intended to be different than what
people were used to witnessing in a theater and the Washington Shakespeare
Company takes it one step further down the road of "different" through
unconventional casting.Storyline: Two maids play a ritualistic game in
their off hours. First one and then the other impersonate their mistress and
recreate her mistreatments of them. As they rotate which "plays" the
mistress and which the mistreated maid, identity becomes confused. Devoted
to the real mistress but jealous of her and resentful of her treatment, they
dream of poisoning her. When she appears, they serve her poisoned tea but
she doesn’t drink it. After her departure they continue their game and one
of them drinks the fatal brew. As a play of identity confusion, however, it
is never clear which character is which, whether the mistress is appearing
in reality or in their minds and, ultimately, whether the "death" following
the "poison" is an extension of the game or the result of it.
Building on the idea of mixed up identity, director Jose Carrasquillo has
cast three male actors in the roles of the maids and the mistress. Cross
dressing can serve many different functions in theater. This show and
Some Like It Hot are at the opposite extremes. Here it is in no way the
comic use, it simply compounds the psychological complexity of the piece. To
Carrasquillo’s credit, and the credit of the cast, they maintain the
illusion consistently throughout. This confirms that the casting is in no
way intended to ridicule the characters of the maids but, rather, to
heighten the obvious confusion in their psyches.
Christopher Henley and Jeffrey Johnson demonstrate an intensity and total
belief in the work as they bring the confused maids to life. As they "play"
at being the mistress or the mistreated, the confusion extends to which is
which. Henley’s mannerisms are exquisitely precise while Johnson, assuming
the persona of the maid who believes herself to be the prettier of the two,
exudes a confidence that is compelling. Karl Miller’s madame is much more
over-the-top which is appropriate as it sets up the compounding confusion of
whether she is real or a figment of the maids' imaginations. Less there be
any doubt about the reason for Miller’s camp demeanor, costume designer
Michelle Reisch has created a fabulously outrageous gown and headdress to
complete the image.
Giorgos Tsappas built a dull, drab, gray playing space in the corner of
the back warehouse of Clark Street which gives just the right feeling of
confinement and claustrophobia for the first hour of the show. When
"Mistress" arrives, however, it is through a door which allows color into
the world in a bright, vivid burst. The use of the warehouse area, however,
does leave the audience at the mercy of the elements -- it is not air
conditioned.
Written by Jean Genet. Directed by Jose Carrasquillo. Design: Giorgos
Tsappas (set) Michele Reisch (costumes) Ayun Fedorcha (lights). Cast:
Christopher Henley, Jeffrey Johnson, Karl Miller. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
April 18 – May 19
Much Ado About Nothing |
Reviewed April 27
Running time 3 hours 10 minutes |
Style over substance isn’t necessarily a bad
thing when the substance needs help. This extremely stylish production takes
a muddled mess of a script and imposes a strong visual concept which is
almost enough to make some sense out of it all. I know that it is not
considered proper to say that any of Master Shakespeare’s scripts are below
par, but this one suffers from both an excess of exposition in the early
going and an excess of confusion toward the end.
Storyline: Confusion reigns over who loves whom as the Governor welcomes
soldiers back from a war. Overheard plots are misunderstood and disguised
assignations result in a furiously jealous groom rejecting the Governor’s
daughter at the alter under the false impression that she has already been
unfaithful to him even before the wedding night. She appears to die of the
shame of it all but a counter-rouse is set up to expose the slander as a
falsehood. Through it all, the Governor’s niece and her suitor battle. It
all ends just before a resolving multiple wedding, leaving the audience to
wonder if this time it will all go as planned.
Director Michael Comlish uses practically all the resources of the
Washington Shakespeare Company to distract his audience’s attention from the
problems in the plotting. This isn’t the same thing as solving the problems
through the imposition of clarity and consistency on the performances. But
it is an effective antidote to boredom. There are a number of fine
performances, most notably from Brook Butterworth as the Governor’s niece,
Andrew Sullivan as her suitor and Christopher Henley doubling as the Prince
of Aragon and his bastard brother. But there are also performances that
confuse or distract including an incredibly broad turn by normally reliable
Mark Rhea that could give overacting a bad name.
Much of the magic that Comlish attempts to weave relies on the work of
set designer David C. Ghatan and lighting designer Lynn Joslin. The first
one and a half acts are performed on a gigantic stage built before steep
risers in the main house of the Clark Street Playhouse which is a converted
warehouse. The stage’s raked floor and the entire back wall are pierced by
many trap doors in and out of which characters pop like the party routine of
the old Laugh-In television show. Strong footlights throw sharp shadows on
the back wall and a number of interesting visual effects are brought out at
moments of key confusion. This is a very musical production as well with
original music, musical selections and even the conversion of some of
Shakespeare’s spoken dialogue to song sung by the actors.
The second act ends with the audience being invited out to the lobby to
stand as witnesses to the ill-fated wedding which is played out on platforms
and balconies in that dramatic space. Then the third act is staged in yet
another area of the large facility – a room that looks like it may normally
be used as a scenery construction shop. A motley collection of chairs and
anything else that can be sat upon (including a commode) provides seating
for the audience as the events of the evening come to a close.
Written by William Shakespeare. Directed by Michael Comlish.
Choreography by Ken Yamaguchi-Clark. Design: David c. Ghatan (set) Mattie
Ullrich (costumes) Lynn Joslin (lights) Brian MacIan (sound). Cast: Brook
Butterworth, Christopher Henley, Michael Miyazaki, Steven Tipton, Grace
Eboigbe, Andrew Sullivan, Mark Rhea, Suzanne Richard, Ken Yamaguchi-Clark,
MaConnia Chesser, Thembi Duncan, Leo Wolfe, Nicholas Jackson, Michael Alan
Oakley, Bruce Phillips, Chris Galindo, Keith Parker, Brian Hemmingsen (on
tape) Brian Desmond (on video). |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
January 21 - February 16
Playing in Rep with Tiny Alice
Learning Curves |
Reviewed January 28
Running time 2 hours 20 minutes |
Allyson Currin is on a roll – two marvelous new
plays premiering in the same month on Potomac stages. Earlier it was
Church of the Open Mind that earned kudos for her well-constructed,
fascinating characters in intellectually stimulating verbal fireworks. Now
it is Learning Curves scoring high on the same scale.Storyline:
A Teaching Assistant in English has an affair with one of her students. She
also has been carrying on an affair with the professor she is assisting.
When she discovers that the professor and the student have found out about
the affairs, an intellectual triangle results, sparking each to examine what
the others bring to their lives, their ambitions and their passions. Through
it all, the image of Shakespeare’s shrew comments on, and challenges the modern
view of femininity.
Not merely funny, Currin’s genuine wit grabs the audience’s attention
from the start, making what might have been a dry disquisition on the
various views of generations at different stages into an entertaining,
engaging and fast paced evening. Whether it is a description of
Shakespeare’s place in the history of theater ("The Neil Simon of his
generation") or parodies of excessively sophomoric term papers ("Being the
son of God, Jesus had a real cross to bear") Currin can move a story forward
with facility and energy.
All three legs of the triangle are solidly portrayed. Melissa Flaim as
the TA in question gives an energetic performance that gets the production’s
motor running and keeps it revving in top gear. Maxwell Hessman is every
inch the self-assured college kid for whom life hasn’t yet presented any great
challenge. Bruce Alan Rauscher who is becoming increasingly familiar to
Potomac region audiences of both professional and community theater turns in
another impressive performance as the professor. He also has to double a few times as Petrucio to
Grace Eboigbe’s Kate in the flashes of The Taming of the Shrew that
frame the feminism/misogyny debate.
The Clark Street Playhouse’s extremely large playing space, set up as it
is for Tiny Alice, is a bit too large for this intimate piece.
Director Lee Mikeska Gardner spreads the action over the large floor space
smoothly, setting up individual areas for different locales without getting
too bogged down in spatial relationships, so that the concentration on the
action and the verbiage isn’t damaged. She also keeps the energy level from
going too far over the top, which keeps the evening bright and fun rather
than exhausting. It is a fine balance.
Written by Allyson Currin. Directed by Lee Mikeska Gardner. Design:
David Ghatan (overal design) Ayun Fedorcha (lights) David Lamont Wilson
(sound.) Cast: Melissa Flaim, Maxwell Hessman, Bruce Alan Rauscher, Grace
Eboigbe. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
January 10 –
February 10, 2002
Tiny Alice |
Reviewed January 14
Running time 3 hours 10 minutes |
With more symbolism than you can shake a stick at, this confusing play has
sparked more "what’s it all about" conversations than Alfie. As the first
work by Edward Albee after the success of Whose Afraid of Virginia Wolfe,
audiences came expecting scintillating dialogue on obscurely intellectual
subjects. The dialogue turns out to be frequently scintillating but more
obscure than many find comfortable. Albee plays always require the audience
to work hard to catch deep meanings but with Tiny Alice it is an
unrewarded chore.
Storyline: The play begins realistically as a Catholic Cardinal begins
making arrangements for the church to receive a grant of historic
proportions. He dispatches a lay brother from his order to the home of the
donor named Alice. But the mansion where "Miss Alice" lives contains a
miniature mansion where "Tiny Alice" resides and there may be additional
layers of miniatures in there ad infinitum. Just who is the benefactor and
what is expected in return? Faith, trust, duty, virtue, intellect and
destiny all intermingle as the play gets more and more allegorical as the
evening continues.
The Washington Shakespeare Company gives this rarely performed play a
production that can be fascinating at times. It is performed on a wide open
marble set by Kevin Adams with the tiny mansion of Tiny Alice suspended at
the rear. There are individual performances that seem to be well constructed
with many revealing details. The trouble comes when you try to connect all
those details to determine just what they reveal. Steve Wilhite is an
impressive Prince of the Church with all the imperious carriage the pompous
character deserves. The look on his face when he realizes he has slipped
from the third person "we are pleased" into the first person "I’m not happy"
is a classic of internalized horror. Jonathan Watkins has the smarmyness of
an opportunistic lawyer down pat. Richard Mancini is every inch a butler
playing Butler – ah, but is he "a" butler or "Mr. Butler."
Artistic Director Christopher Henley plays the lay brother: a young man
named Julian who may be on an errand as emissary of the church or may be
what the church is giving to Alice in return for the fortune involved in the
bequest/grant. Henley carries his transition from innocent to suspicious to
fearful in a forceful performance. Jenifer Deal as Alice matches Henley’s
complex performance with one that suggests many different motivations,
keeping the relationship between the two of them shifting like sand. No
wonder Brother Julian gets caught up in a quagmire.
Tiny Alice is a challenge for directors, designers, performers and,
yes, audiences. Even John Gielgud, who starred in
the original production as Brother Julian, said even he didn’t understand
what the play was about. He’s not alone.
Written by Edward Albee. Directed by John Vreeke. Design: Kevin Adams
(set) Ayun Fedorcha (lights) Michele Reisch (costumes) Mark Anduss (sound.)
Cast: Christopher Henley, Jenifer Deal, Steve Wilhite, Jonathan Watkins,
Richard Mancini. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
November 15 – December 23, 2001
Macbett |
Reviewed November 24
Running time 2 hours 45 minutes |
If you missed the last letter in the title, mistaking the "t" for an "h" and
entered the theater expecting the Washington Shakespeare Company to present
Shakespeare’s Macbeth, your first clue of your error will be the
announcement welcoming you to the "Washington Ianesco Company." Eugene
Ionesco, that is – the Romanian-French playwright who popularized the
concept of a "theater of the absurd" in the 1950s and 60s.
Storyline: A parody of the tale of the Scottish lord who,
with prophecies from three witches ringing in his ears and driven by his
wife’s ambitions, finds murder and treachery is his road to the throne in a
court where neither murder nor treachery is out of the ordinary.
Ianesco’s fame stems from his work at the end of the "beatnick"
period while this play comes from the 1970s when his sense of the absurd
seemed somewhat less acute. The very concept of the theater of the absurd –
as opposed to absurd theater – was to use theatrical conventions to
demonstrate the ludicrousness and meaninglessness its authors perceived in
the real world. By the time this play was written, the conventions of the
styles of Ianesco, Beckett and others seemed to be turned closer to a
three-stooges mixture of verbal and physical slapstick.
Co-Directors Kathleen Akerley and Christopher Henley have
assembled a nine person cast for the nearly fifty named parts in the play.
Among them are standouts playing only one role such as Jonathon Church and
Jenifer Deal as King and Lady Duncan, Clinton Brandhaen and Ashley Strand as
Banco and Macbet. Then there are stalwarts such as Michael John Casey
filling in over a dozen parts and Dan Brick with nine.
They all work very hard and keep things moving briskly
along for nearly three hours and they put over some of the funnier bits
quite well. Creating a coherent whole out of a script that includes
conscious incoherence, however, is asking too much and, ultimately this is
an evening of loosely connected bits even for those who enter the theater
with a strong grounding in the play being parodied.
Written by Eugene Ionesco.
Directed by Kathleen Akerley and Christopher Henley. Design: Giorgos Tsappas
(set) Don Slater (lights) Lynn Sharp Spears (costimes) Mark Anduss (Sound.)
Cast: Phil Bolin, Clinton Brandhagen, Dan Brick, Michael John Casey,
Jonathon Church, Jenifer Deal, Ashley Strand, Melanie Tatum, Grady
Weatherford. |
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
September 20 - October 21, 2001
Antony & Cleopatra |
Reviewed September 24 |
This is a handsome and frequently impressive production of one of
Shakespeare's more difficult plays. The problem isn’t all the fault of
either the Washington Shakespeare Company, Cam Magee who abridged the script
as well as co-directed with Lofty Durham, or of Ian Armstrong who plays Mark
Antony. The fault really lies with the bard himself. But this team can’t
quite overcome the difficulty in Shakespeare’s original play -- that the
central character has already fallen apart before the play begins.
Storyline: Set after the death of Julius Caesar, the play picks up as
Mark Antony lingers in Egypt with Cleopatra while the struggle for
leadership proceeds in Rome. Summoned home after his wife’s death, Antony
marries again in a match designed to shore up the leadership of Rome. But
Antony returns to Cleopatra only to have the leadership battle erupt into
open warfare leading ultimately to his and Cleopatra’s suicide.
Delia Taylor is a striking Cleopatra creating a commanding presence and
displaying a very real passion for Antony, and Ian Armstrong has a strength
in his more intemperate scenes. There is a spark between the two that hints
at the power of the legendary love. Jason Stiles as an imperious Octavius
Caesar and Rusty Clauss as one of Cleopatra's attendants also make an
impression.
Greg Mitchell comes up with a handsome set dominated by Julius Caesar’s
sarcophagus. It is, however, an almost constant reminder that the really
important parts of the stories of these lives were already dead and buried.
The pain and suffering are there for all to see and the denouement is a
stunning image of blood rolling down the polished palace floor. It is a play
not frequently performed and this is one opportunity to see it attempted
with style. |
|
|
|
|
|