Home of the FREE weekly email Update

Home Reviews News
Contact Potomac Stages About Potomac Stages
 
 
Web PotomacStages

 
Zemfira Stage - ARHCIVE
Click here to go to this theater's main page


 

 
June 28 - July 15, 2007
Lost Eden: The Magnificent Welles

Running time 1:35 - one intermission
A well performed solo performance biographical play


Jay Tilley, who tackles Marcus Wolland's portrait of Orson Welles at age twenty seven, is at an appropriate age to take on the role. He also bears enough of a physical resemblance to Welles and carries off Welles' over-blown vocal mannerisms with ease. What is more, a solo performance piece needs to be more than mere impersonation, and here Tilley shows he has the skills to make this a character portrait and not simply an imitation of his subject's appearance and mannerisms. He manages to imbue the character with intelligence, emotion and a massive ego. Goodness knows, Welles had plenty of each!

Storyline: In 1942, Orson Welles has already made a mark in theater (the Haitian Macbeth, the legendary premiere of Mark Blitztein's The Cradle Will Rock) radio (as the voice of The Shadow and, of course, the famous 1938 Halloween broadcast of The War of the Worlds on his Mercury Theatre of the Air) and movies (Citizen Kane). Now he's in Rio de Janeiro directing a documentary at the request of the US Government when he discovers that studio bosses back in Hollywood are re-editing his latest movie, The Magnificent Ambersons. His only weapon to fight the edits is the long distance telephone. Between calls, he recalls the highs and lows of his career thus far.

A good bio play needs one thing above all: A subject worthy of the project. In Welles, it has a subject that can and does fascinate for the full hour and a half. His career to that point had been astonishingly rich in triumphs and varied in the nature of his activities. The incidents he relates are the stuff of legend in a variety of branches of the entertainment industry. While he declares that twenty seven isn't too young for an autobiography if the life lived to date is rich enough, it is also arguable that he had already had all the successes that would make him memorable. It may have been all down hill from there, but what a height he occupied in 1942!

The script that Tilley is working from has some of the same problems that cause many solo performance bio plays to suffer. It jumps back and forth from the chronological presentation of Welles' life story to the fairly artificial set-up, the concept of having Welles stuck in a hotel room in Rio de Janeiro pleading by phone with the likes of studio head George Schaefer and loyal colleague Joseph Cotton. Tilley also has to have Welles explain some of the historical background in a fairly didactic tone. Of course, Welles himself would probably have struck just such a tone if he were really telling the story to visitors at the time.

The Lyceum is not a bad venue for a piece like this. The play doesn't really require a stage or an elaborate set and the recital hall in the Lyceum provides both enough space for the show and comfortable seats before a slightly raised platform on which the company has placed a desk with a telephone. Tilley performs from the desk at times and from the floor in front of the raised platform at others, drawing the audience into his confidence for his auto-biographical ruminations. There's no production sleight of hand to help the actor cast his spell, but there's nothing to get in the way, either.

Written by Marcus Wolland. Directed by Zina T. Bleck and Herb Tax. Design: Herb Tax (lights and sound) Zina Bleck (photography). Cast: Jay Tilley.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 

March 9 - April 1, 2007
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Reviewed by Brad Hathaway

Running time 2:30 - two intermissions
Martha screams at George again
Click here to buy the script


It has been just six weeks since Martha stopped screaming at George and he stopped needling her for that final shared moment that Edward Albee sets up so well in his marvelously structured play about two people who can only touch each other through vitriol. Then, of course, it was the Broadway revival team of Bill Irwin and Kathleen Turner holding forth on the stage of the Eisenhower Theatre. He was spectacular and she was superb - but they've moved on now, and besides, the tickets were $25 to $78. Now, for all of $15 ($10 for seniors and students) you can make George and Martha's acquaintance in the small upstairs room of the Lyceum in Alexandria. This time it is Cal Whitehurst and Janet Smith who assay the only-semi-successful collegiate associate professor of history and his six year older wife who reminds him at every opportunity that she's the daughter of the college president. Star power and production values have given way to a straightforward but thoroughly competent presentation marked by Whitehurst's guileful performance.

Storyline: An English professor at a small New England college and his wife, the daughter of the college’s president, return from a faculty party. He is displeased to learn that she has invited a new young professor and his wife back for after-party drinks. After all, it is 2 a.m.  They bicker and fight, inflicting pain and suffering as if that were the only way they can make any kind of personal connection with each other. All through the night they get angrier, and meaner and the guests are dragged into the struggle.

The word "masterpiece" is often misused in discussion of works of art. However, it is most definitely appropriate here, for this is not only a play in which Edward Albee displays the skills of a master playwright, it is the play that established his reputation. It was his first play to be produced on Broadway and it earned him his first Tony award (he went on to earn two more as well as three Pulitzer Prizes). That is not to say that it is a pleasant play. It is deeply troubling. But, as disturbing as they are, George and Martha are somehow universal and their flaws universally fascinating. Neither is a person you would chose to add to your real life circle of acquaintances, but, then, neither is Hamlet and we go to see him on stage when done well.

Whitehurst plumbs emotional depths in this production that bring the character of George into sharp focus. He carries himself with the stooped shouldered shuffling symbolic of the pain the years in this long-suffering relationship has cost him combined with the semi-authoritarian habits of speech that years of lecturing in class have imprinted on his brain. Smith captures a good deal of Martha's surface bombast and hints at her inner frustrations, but she often lets you see that she's acting. The same is occasionally true of Michael Fisher who plays the new faculty member George and Martha entertain, but not so Wendy Lamond-Broughton, who is quite good as the young bride of the new faculty member.

This play doesn't require special effects, elaborate sets or gorgeous costumes. Indeed, the original Broadway production in 1963 is reported to have had a budget of $42,000. Adjusted for inflation, however, that would amount to over a quarter of a million. No such budget would be available for this small production. The set consists of a few chairs, a couch, a coat rack and the ever-important cocktail cart with a large ice bucket that George takes off stage to refill. The dramatic impact of the play isn't harmed one bit by such sparse resources. Its only limitation is the skills of its cast which, while uneven, are sufficient to carry the audience along on Mr. Albee's strange tour of a disconcerting couple's relationship.

Written by Edward Albee. Directed by Zina T. Bleck. Design: Herb Tax (lights, sound, stage management). Cast: Michael Fisher, Wendy Lamond-Broughton, Janet Smith, Cal Whitehurst.